• Images
• Videos
• Documents
• Books
• Articles

Rhetorical stage

See also: Measurement

Many areas of mathematics began with the study of real world problems, before the underlying rules and concepts were identified and defined as abstract structures. For example, geometry has its origins in the calculation of distances and areas in the real world; algebra started with methods of solving problems in arithmetic. The earliest mathematical notations emerged from these problems.

There can be no doubt that most early peoples who left records knew something of numeration and mechanics and that a few were also acquainted with the elements of land-surveying. In particular, the ancient Egyptians paid attention to geometry and numbers, and the ancient Phoenicians performed practical arithmetic, book-keeping, navigation, and land-surveying. The results attained by these people seem to have been accessible (under certain conditions) to travelers, facilitating dispersal of the methods. It is probable that the knowledge of the Egyptians and Phoenicians was largely the result of observation and measurement, and represented the accumulated experience of many ages. Subsequent studies of mathematics by the Greeks were largely indebted to these previous investigations.

Beginning of notation

See also: Ancient history, History of writing ancient numbers, and History of science in early cultures

Written mathematics began with numbers expressed as tally marks, with each tally representing a single unit. Numerical symbols consisted probably of strokes or notches cut in wood or stone, which were intelligible across cultures. For example, one notch in a bone represented one animal, person, or object. Numerical notation's distinctive feature—symbols having both local and intrinsic values—implies a state of civilization at the period of its invention.

The earliest evidence of written mathematics dates back to the ancient Sumerians and the system of metrology from 3000 BC. From around 2500 BC onwards, the Sumerians wrote multiplication tables on clay tablets and dealt with geometrical exercises and division problems. The earliest traces of Babylonian numerals also date back to this period.⁸ Babylonian mathematics has been reconstructed from more than 400 clay tablets unearthed since the 1850s.⁹ Written in cuneiform, these tablets were inscribed whilst the clay was soft and then baked hard in an oven or by the heat of the sun. Some of these appear to be graded homework.

The majority of Mesopotamian clay tablets date from 1800 to 1600 BC, and cover topics which include fractions, algebra, quadratic and cubic equations, and the calculation of regular numbers, reciprocals, and pairs.¹⁰ The tablets also include multiplication tables and methods for solving linear and quadratic equations. The Babylonian tablet YBC 7289 gives an approximation of √2 that is accurate to an equivalent of six decimal places.

Babylonian mathematics were written using a sexagesimal (base-60) numeral system. From this derives the modern-day usage of 60 seconds in a minute, 60 minutes in an hour, and 360 (60 × 6) degrees in a circle, as well as the use of minutes and seconds of arc to denote fractions of a degree. Babylonian advances in mathematics were facilitated by the fact that 60 has many divisors: the reciprocal of any integer which is a multiple of divisors of 60 has a finite expansion in base 60. (In decimal arithmetic, only reciprocals of multiples of 2 and 5 have finite decimal expansions.) Also, unlike the Egyptians, Greeks, and Romans, the Babylonians had a true place-value system, where digits written in the left column represented larger values, much as in the decimal system. They lacked, however, an equivalent of the decimal point, and so the place value of a symbol often had to be inferred from the context.

Initially, the Mesopotamians had symbols for each power of ten.¹¹ Later, they wrote numbers in almost exactly the same way as in modern times. Instead of using unique symbols for each power of ten, they wrote only the coefficients of each power of ten, with each digit separated by only a space. By the time of Alexander the Great, they had created a symbol that represented zero and was a placeholder.

Rhetorical algebra was first developed by the ancient Babylonians and remained dominant up to the 16th century. In this system, equations are written in full sentences. For example, the rhetorical form of x + 1 = 2 {\displaystyle x+1=2} is "The thing plus one equals two" or possibly "The thing plus 1 equals 2".

The ancient Egyptians numerated by hieroglyphics.¹²¹³ Egyptian mathematics had symbols for one, ten, one hundred, one thousand, ten thousand, one hundred thousand, and one million. Smaller digits were placed on the left of the number, as they are in Hindu–Arabic numerals. Later, the Egyptians used hieratic instead of hieroglyphic script to show numbers. Hieratic was more like cursive and replaced several groups of symbols with individual ones. For example, the four vertical lines used to represent the number 'four' were replaced by a single horizontal line. This is found in the Rhind Mathematical Papyrus (c. 2000–1800 BC) and the Moscow Mathematical Papyrus (c. 1890 BC). The system the Egyptians used was discovered and modified by many other civilizations in the Mediterranean. The Egyptians also had symbols for basic operations: legs going forward represented addition, and legs walking backward to represent subtraction.

The peoples with whom the Greeks of Asia Minor (amongst whom notation in western history begins) were likely to have come into frequent contact were those inhabiting the eastern littoral of the Mediterranean; Greek tradition uniformly assigned the special development of geometry to the Egyptians, and the science of numbers to either the Egyptians or the Phoenicians.

Syncopated stage

See also: Fundamental theorem of arithmetic and Naive set theory

The history of mathematics cannot with certainty be traced back to any school or period before that of the Ionian Greeks. Still, the subsequent history may be divided into periods, the distinctions between which are tolerably well-marked. Greek mathematics, which originated with the study of geometry, tended to be deductive and scientific from its commencement. Since the fourth century AD, Pythagoras has commonly been given credit for discovering the Pythagorean theorem, a theorem in geometry that states that in a right-angled triangle the area of the square on the hypotenuse (the side opposite the right angle) is equal to the sum of the areas of the squares of the other two sides.¹⁴ However, this geometric relationship appears in a few earlier ancient mathematical texts (albeit not as a formalized theorem), notably Plimpton 322, a Babylonian tablet of mathematics from around 1900 BC. The study of mathematics as a subject in its own right began in the 6th century BC with the Pythagoreans, who coined the term "mathematics" from the ancient Greek mathema (μάθημα), meaning "subject of instruction".¹⁵

Plato's influence was especially strong in mathematics and the sciences. He helped to distinguish between pure and applied mathematics by widening the gap between "arithmetic" (now called number theory) and "logistic" (now called arithmetic). Greek mathematics greatly refined the methods (especially through the introduction of deductive reasoning and mathematical rigor in proofs) and expanded the subject matter of mathematics.¹⁶ Aristotle is credited with what later would be called the law of excluded middle.

Abstract or pure mathematics¹⁷ deals with concepts like magnitude and quantity without regard to any practical application or situation, and includes arithmetic and geometry. In contrast, in mixed or applied mathematics, mathematical properties and relationships are applied to real-world objects to model laws of physics, for example in hydrostatics, optics, and navigation.¹⁸

Archimedes is generally considered to be the greatest mathematician of antiquity and one of the greatest of all time.¹⁹²⁰ He used the method of exhaustion to calculate the area under the arc of a parabola with the summation of an infinite series, and gave a remarkably accurate approximation of pi.²¹ He also defined the spiral bearing his name, formulae for the volumes of surfaces of revolution, and an ingenious system for expressing very large numbers.

The ancient Greeks made steps in the abstraction of geometry. Euclid's Elements (c. 300 BC) is the earliest extant documentation of the axioms of plane geometry—though Proclus tells of an earlier axiomatisation by Hippocrates of Chios²² —and is one of the oldest extant Greek mathematical treatises. Consisting of thirteen books, it collects theorems proven by other mathematicians, supplemented by some original work. The document is a successful collection of definitions, postulates (axioms), propositions (theorems and constructions), and mathematical proofs of the propositions, and covers topics such as Euclidean geometry, geometric algebra, elementary number theory, and the ancient Greek version of algebraic systems. The first theorem given in the text, Euclid's lemma, captures a fundamental property of prime numbers. The text was ubiquitous in the quadrivium and was instrumental in the development of logic, mathematics, and science. Autolycus' On the Moving Sphere is another ancient mathematical manuscript of the time.

The next phase of notation for algebra was syncopated algebra, in which some symbolism is used, but which does not contain all of the characteristics of symbolic algebra. For instance, there may be a restriction that subtraction may be used only once within one side of an equation, which is not the case with symbolic algebra. Syncopated algebraic expression first appeared in a serious of books called Arithmetica, by Diophantus of Alexandria (3rd century AD; many lost), followed by Brahmagupta's Brahma Sphuta Siddhanta (7th century).

Acrophonic and Milesian numeration

The ancient Greeks employed Attic numeration,²³ which was based on the system of the Egyptians and was later adapted and used by the Romans. Greek numerals one through four were written as vertical lines, as in the hieroglyphics. The symbol for five was the Greek letter Π (pi), representing the Greek word for 'five' (pente). Numbers six through nine were written as a Π with vertical lines beside it. Ten was represented by the letter Δ (delta), from word for 'ten' (deka), one hundred by the letter from the word for hundred, and so on. This system was 'acrophonic' since it was based on the first sound of the numeral.²⁴

Milesian (Ionian) numeration was another Greek numeral system. It was constructed by partitioning the twenty-four letters of the Greek alphabet, plus three archaic letters, into three classes of nine letters each, and using them to represent the units, tens, and hundreds.²⁵ (Jean Baptiste Joseph Delambre's Astronomie Ancienne, t. ii.)

Α (α)	Β (β)	Г (γ)	Δ (δ)	Ε (ε)	Ϝ (ϝ)	Ζ (ζ)	Η (η)	θ (θ)	Ι (ι)	Κ (κ)	Λ (λ)	Μ (μ)	Ν (ν)	Ξ (ξ)	Ο (ο)	Π (π)	Ϟ (ϟ)	Ρ (ρ)	Σ (σ)	Τ (τ)	Υ (υ)	Φ (φ)	Χ (χ)	Ψ (ψ)	Ω (ω)	Ϡ (ϡ)
1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9	10	20	30	40	50	60	70	80	90	100	200	300	400	500	600	700	800	900

This system appeared in the third century BC, before the letters digamma (Ϝ), koppa (Ϟ), and sampi (Ϡ) became obsolete. When lowercase letters became differentiated from uppercase letters, the lowercase letters were used as the symbols for notation. Multiples of one thousand were written as the nine numbers with a stroke in front of them: thus, one thousand was ",α", two thousand was ",β", etc. The letter M (for μύριοι, as in "myriad") was used to multiply numbers by ten thousand. For example, the number 88,888,888 would be written as M,ηωπη*ηωπη.²⁶

Milesian numeration, though far less convenient than modern numerals, was formed on a perfectly regular and scientific plan,²⁷ and could be used with tolerable effect as an instrument of calculation, to which purpose the Roman system was totally inapplicable.

Greek mathematical reasoning was almost entirely geometric (albeit often used to reason about non-geometric subjects such as number theory), and hence the Greeks had no interest in algebraic symbols. An exception was the great algebraist Diophantus of Alexandria.²⁸ His Arithmetica was one of the texts to use symbols in equations. It was not completely symbolic, but was much more so than previous books. In it, an unknown number was called s; the square of s was Δ y {\displaystyle \Delta ^{y}} ; the cube was K y {\displaystyle K^{y}} ; the fourth power was Δ y Δ {\displaystyle \Delta ^{y}\Delta } ; and the fifth power was Δ K y {\displaystyle \Delta K^{y}} .²⁹ So for example, the expression:

2 x 4 + 3 x 3 − 4 x 2 + 5 x − 6 {\displaystyle 2x^{4}+3x^{3}-4x^{2}+5x-6}

would be written as:

SS2 C3 x5 M S4 u6

Chinese mathematical notation

Main article: Suzhou numerals

See also: Chinese numerals

The ancient Chinese used numerals that look much like the tally system.³⁰ Numbers one through four were horizontal lines. Five was an X between two horizontal lines; it looked almost exactly the same as the Roman numeral for ten. Nowadays, this huama numeral system is only used for displaying prices in Chinese markets or on traditional handwritten invoices.

Mathematics in China emerged independently by the 11th century BC,³¹ but has much older roots. The ancient Chinese were acquainted with astronomical cycles, geometrical implements like the rule, compass, and plumb-bob, and machines like the wheel and axle. The Chinese independently developed very large and negative numbers, decimals, a place value decimal system, a binary system, algebra, geometry, and trigonometry. As in other early societies, the purpose of astronomy was to perfect the agricultural calendar and other practical tasks, not to establish a formal system; thus, the duties of the Chinese Board of Mathematics were confined to the annual preparation of the dates and predictions of the almanac.

Early Chinese mathematical inventions include a place value system known as counting rods³²³³ (which emerged during the Warring States period), certain geometrical theorems (such as the ratio of sides), and the suanpan (abacus) for performing arithmetic calculations. Mathematical results were expressed in writing. Ancient Chinese mathematicians did not develop an axiomatic approach, but made advances in algorithm development and algebra. Chinese algebra reached its zenith in the 13th century, when Zhu Shijie invented the method of four unknowns. Early China exemplifies how a civilization may possess considerable skill in the applied arts with only scarce understanding of the formal mathematics on which those arts are founded.

Due to linguistic and geographic barriers, as well as content, the mathematics of ancient China and the mathematics of the ancient Mediterranean world are presumed to have developed more or less independently. The final form of The Nine Chapters on the Mathematical Art and the Book on Numbers and Computation and Huainanzi are roughly contemporary with classical Greek mathematics. Some exchange of ideas across Asia through known cultural exchanges from at least Roman times is likely. Frequently, elements of the mathematics of early societies correspond to rudimentary results found later in branches of modern mathematics such as geometry or number theory. For example, the Pythagorean theorem was attested in the Zhoubi Suanjing, and knowledge of Pascal's triangle has also been shown to have existed in China centuries before Blaise Pascal,³⁴ articulated by mathematicians like the polymath Shen Kuo.

The state of trigonometry advanced during the Song dynasty (960–1279), when Chinese mathematicians had greater need of spherical trigonometry in calendrical science and astronomical calculations.³⁵ Shen Kuo used trigonometric functions to solve mathematical problems of chords and arcs.³⁶ Shen's work on arc lengths provided the basis for spherical trigonometry developed in the 13th century by the mathematician and astronomer Guo Shoujing.³⁷ As the historians L. Gauchet and Joseph Needham state, Guo Shoujing used spherical trigonometry in his calculations to improve the calendar system and Chinese astronomy.³⁸³⁹ Chinese mathematics later incorporated the work and teaching of Arab missionaries with knowledge of spherical trigonometry who had come to China during the 13th century.

Indian and Arabic numerals and notation

See also: Arabic numerals, Hindu–Arabic numeral system, History of the Hindu–Arabic numeral system, and Mathematics in medieval Islam

The Hindu–Arabic numeral system and the rules for the use of its operations, in use throughout the world today, likely evolved over the course of the first millennium AD in India and was transmitted to the west via Islamic mathematics.⁴⁰⁴¹ Islamic mathematics developed and expanded the mathematics known to Central Asian civilizations,⁴² including the addition of the decimal point notation to the Arabic numerals.[contradictory]

The algebraic notation of the Indian mathematician Brahmagupta was syncopated (that is, some operations and quantities had symbolic representations). Addition was indicated by placing the numbers side by side, subtraction by placing a dot over the subtrahend (the number to be subtracted), and division by placing the divisor below the dividend, similar to our notation but without the bar. Multiplication, evolution, and unknown quantities were represented by abbreviations of appropriate terms.⁴³

Despite their name, Arabic numerals have roots in India. The reason for this misnomer is Europeans saw the numerals used in an Arabic book, Concerning the Hindu Art of Reckoning, by Muhammed ibn-Musa al-Khwarizmi. Al-Khwārizmī wrote several important books on the Hindu–Arabic numerals and on methods for solving equations. His book On the Calculation with Hindu Numerals (c. 825), along with the work of Al-Kindi, were instrumental in spreading Indian mathematics and numerals to the West. Al-Khwarizmi did not claim the numerals as Arabic, but over several Latin translations, the fact that the numerals were Indian in origin was lost. The word algorithm is derived from the Latinization of Al-Khwārizmī's name, Algoritmi, and the word algebra from the title of one of his works, Al-Kitāb al-mukhtaṣar fī hīsāb al-ğabr wa'l-muqābala (The Compendious Book on Calculation by Completion and Balancing).

The modern Arabic numeral symbols used around the world first appeared in Islamic North Africa in the 10th century. A distinctive Western Arabic variant of the Eastern Arabic numerals began to emerge around the 10th century in the Maghreb and Al-Andalus (sometimes called ghubar numerals, though the term is not always accepted), which are the direct ancestor of the modern Arabic numerals used throughout the world.⁴⁴

Many Greek and Arabic texts on mathematics were then translated into Latin, which led to further development of mathematics in medieval Europe. In the 12th century, scholars traveled to Spain and Sicily seeking scientific Arabic texts, including al-Khwārizmī's (translated into Latin by Robert of Chester) and the complete text of Euclid's Elements (translated in various versions by Adelard of Bath, Herman of Carinthia, and Gerard of Cremona).⁴⁵⁴⁶ One of the European books that advocated using the numerals was Liber Abaci, by Leonardo of Pisa, better known as Fibonacci. Liber Abaci is better known for containing a mathematical problem in which the growth of a rabbit population ends up being the Fibonacci sequence.

Symbolic stage

Symbols by popular introduction date

Further information: Table of mathematical symbols by introduction date

Early arithmetic and multiplication

See also: Early modern age, Probability, Statistics, Notation in probability and statistics, History of probability, History of statistics, and Scientific revolution

The transition to symbolic algebra, where only symbols are used, can first be seen in the work of Ibn al-Banna' al-Marrakushi (1256–1321) and Abū al-Ḥasan ibn ʿAlī al-Qalaṣādī (1412–1482).⁴⁷⁴⁸ Al-Qalasādī was the last major medieval Arab algebraist, who improved on the algebraic notation earlier used in the Maghreb by Ibn al-Banna.⁴⁹ In contrast to the syncopated notations of their predecessors, Diophantus and Brahmagupta, which lacked symbols for mathematical operations,⁵⁰ al-Qalasadi's algebraic notation was the first to have symbols for these functions and was thus "the first steps toward the introduction of algebraic symbolism". He represented mathematical symbols using characters from the Arabic alphabet.⁵¹

The 14th century saw the development of new mathematical concepts to investigate a wide range of problems.⁵² The two most widely used arithmetic symbols are addition and subtraction, + and −. The plus sign was used starting around 1351 by Nicole Oresme⁵³ and publicized in his work Algorismus proportionum (1360).⁵⁴ It is thought to be an abbreviation for "et", meaning "and" in Latin, in much the same way the ampersand sign also began as "et". Oresme at the University of Paris and the Italian Giovanni di Casali independently provided graphical demonstrations of the distance covered by a body undergoing uniformly accelerated motion, asserting that the area under the line depicting the constant acceleration and represented the total distance traveled.⁵⁵ The minus sign was used in 1489 by Johannes Widmann in Mercantile Arithmetic or Behende und hüpsche Rechenung auff allen Kauffmanschafft.⁵⁶ Widmann used the minus symbol with the plus symbol to indicate deficit and surplus, respectively.⁵⁷ In Summa de arithmetica, geometria, proportioni e proportionalità,⁵⁸ Luca Pacioli used plus and minus symbols and algebra, though much of the work originated from Piero della Francesca whom he appropriated and purloined.

The radical symbol (√), for square root, was introduced by Christoph Rudolff in the early 1500s.Michael Stifel's important work Arithmetica integra⁵⁹ contained important innovations in mathematical notation. In 1556 Niccolò Tartaglia used parentheses for precedence grouping. In 1557 Robert Recorde published The Whetstone of Witte, which introduced the equal sign (=), as well as plus and minus signs, to the English reader. In 1564 Gerolamo Cardano analyzed games of chance beginning the early stages of probability theory. Rafael Bombelli published his L'Algebra (1572) in which he showed how to deal with the imaginary quantities that could appear in Cardano's formula for solving cubic equations. Simon Stevin's book De Thiende ("The Art of Tenths"), published in Dutch in 1585, contained a systematic treatment of decimal notation, which influenced all later work on the real number system. The new algebra (1591) of François Viète introduced the modern notational manipulation of algebraic expressions.

John Napier is best known as the inventor of logarithms (published in Description of the Marvelous Canon of Logarithms)⁶⁰ and made common the use of the decimal point in arithmetic and mathematics.⁶¹⁶² After Napier, Edmund Gunter created the logarithmic scales (lines, or rules); William Oughtred used two such scales sliding by one another to perform direct multiplication and division and is credited as the inventor of the slide rule in 1622. In 1631 Oughtred introduced the multiplication sign (×), his proportionality sign (∷), and abbreviations 'sin' and 'cos' for the sine and cosine functions.⁶³ Albert Girard also used the abbreviations 'sin', 'cos', and 'tan' for the trigonometric functions in his treatise.

René Descartes is credited as the father of analytical geometry, the bridge between algebra and geometry, crucial to the discovery of infinitesimal calculus and analysis. In the 17th century, Descartes introduced Cartesian co-ordinates which allowed the development of analytic geometry, bringing the notation of equations to geometry. Blaise Pascal influenced mathematics throughout his life; for instance, his Traité du triangle arithmétique ("Treatise on the Arithmetical Triangle") (1653) described a convenient tabular presentation for binomial coefficients, now called Pascal's triangle. John Wallis introduced the infinity symbol (∞) and also used this notation for infinitesimals, for example, ⁠1/∞⁠.

Johann Rahn introduced the division sign (÷, an obelus variant repurposed) and the therefore sign (∴) in 1659. William Jones used π in Synopsis palmariorum mathesios⁶⁴ in 1706 because it is the initial letter of the Greek word perimetron (περιμετρον), which means perimeter in Greek. This usage was popularized in 1737 by Euler. In 1734, Pierre Bouguer used double horizontal bar below the inequality sign.⁶⁵

Derivatives notation: Leibniz and Newton

See also: Leibniz's notation and Leibniz–Newton calculus controversy

The study of linear algebra emerged from the study of determinants, which were used to solve systems of linear equations. Calculus had two main systems of notation, each created by one of its creators: that developed by Isaac Newton and that developed by Gottfried Leibniz. Leibniz's notation is used most often today.

Newton's notation was simply a dot or dash placed above the function. For example, the derivative of the function x would be written as x ˙ {\displaystyle {\dot {x}}} . The second derivative of x would be written as x ¨ {\displaystyle {\ddot {x}}} . In modern usage, this notation generally denotes derivatives of physical quantities with respect to time, and is used frequently in the science of mechanics. Leibniz, on the other hand, used the letter d as a prefix to indicate differentiation, and introduced the notation representing derivatives as if they were a special type of fraction. For example, the derivative of the function x with respect to the variable t in Leibniz's notation would be written as d x d t {\textstyle {dx \over dt}} . This notation makes explicit the variable with respect to which the derivative of the function is taken. Leibniz also created the integral symbol (∫). For example: ∫ − N N f ( x ) d x {\textstyle \int _{-N}^{N}f(x)\,dx} . When finding areas under curves, integration is often illustrated by dividing the area into infinitely many tall, thin rectangles, whose areas are added. Thus, the integral symbol is an elongated S, representing the Latin word summa, meaning "sum".

High division operators and functions

At this time, letters of the alphabet were to be used as symbols of quantity; and although much diversity existed with respect to the choice of letters, there came to be several universally recognized rules.⁶⁶ Here thus in the history of equations the first letters of the alphabet became indicatively known as coefficients, while the last letters as unknown terms (an incerti ordinis). In algebraic geometry, again, a similar rule was to be observed: the last letters of the alphabet came to denote the variable or current coordinates. Certain letters were by universal consent appropriated as symbols for the frequently occurring numbers (such as π {\displaystyle \pi } for 3.14159... and e for 2.7182818...), and other uses were to be avoided as much as possible.⁶⁷ Letters, too, were to be employed as symbols of operation, and with them other previously mentioned arbitrary operation characters. The letters d and elongated S were to be appropriated as operative symbols in differential calculus and integral calculus, and Δ {\displaystyle \Delta } and Σ {\displaystyle \Sigma } in the calculus of differences.⁶⁸ In functional notation, a letter, as a symbol of operation, is combined with another which is regarded as a symbol of quantity.⁶⁹

Thus, f ( x ) {\displaystyle f(x)} denotes the mathematical result of the performance of the operation f {\displaystyle f} upon the subject x {\displaystyle x} . If upon this result the same operation is repeated, the new result would be expressed by f [ f ( x ) ] {\displaystyle f[f(x)]} , or more concisely by f 2 ( x ) {\displaystyle f^{2}(x)} , and so on. The quantity x {\displaystyle x} itself regarded as the result of the same operation f {\displaystyle f} upon some other function; the proper symbol for which is, by analogy, f − 1 ( x ) {\displaystyle f^{-1}(x)} . Thus f {\displaystyle f} and f − 1 {\displaystyle f^{-1}} are symbols of inverse operations, the former cancelling the effect of the latter on the subject x {\displaystyle x} . f ( x ) {\displaystyle f(x)} and f − 1 ( x ) {\displaystyle f^{-1}(x)} in a similar manner are termed inverse functions.

Beginning in 1718, Thomas Twinin used the division slash (solidus), deriving it from the earlier Arabic horizontal fraction bar. Pierre-Simon, Marquis de Laplace developed the widely used Laplacian differential operator (e.g. Δ f ( p ) {\displaystyle \Delta f(p)} ). In 1750, Gabriel Cramer developed Cramer's Rule for solving linear systems.

Euler and prime notations

Leonhard Euler was one of the most prolific mathematicians in history, and also a prolific inventor of canonical notation. His contributions include his use of e to represent the base of natural logarithms. It is not known exactly why e was chosen, but it was probably because the first four letters of the alphabet were already commonly used to represent variables and other constants. Euler consistently used π {\displaystyle \pi } to represent pi. The use of π {\displaystyle \pi } was suggested by William Jones, who used it as shorthand for perimeter. Euler used i {\displaystyle i} to represent the square root of negative one ( − 1 {\textstyle {\sqrt {-1}}} ) although he earlier used it as an infinite number. Today, the symbol created by John Wallis, ∞ {\displaystyle \infty } , is used for infinity, as in e.g. ∑ n = 1 ∞ 1 n 2 {\textstyle \sum _{n=1}^{\infty }{\frac {1}{n^{2}}}} . For summation, Euler used an enlarged form of the upright capital Greek letter sigma (Σ), known as capital-sigma notation. This is defined as:

∑ i = m n a i = a m + a m + 1 + a m + 2 + ⋯ + a n − 1 + a n . {\displaystyle \sum _{i=m}^{n}a_{i}=a_{m}+a_{m+1}+a_{m+2}+\cdots +a_{n-1}+a_{n}.}

where i represents the index of summation; ai is an indexed variable representing each successive term in the series; m is the lower bound of summation, and n is the upper bound of summation. The term "i = m" under the summation symbol means that the index i starts equal to m. The index, i, is incremented by 1 for each successive term, stopping when i = n.

For functions, Euler used the notation f ( x ) {\displaystyle f(x)} to represent a function of x {\displaystyle x} .

The mathematician William Emerson⁷⁰ developed the proportionality sign (∝). Proportionality is the ratio of one quantity to another, and the sign is used to indicate the ratio between two variables is constant.⁷¹⁷² Much later in the abstract expressions of the value of various proportional phenomena, the parts-per notation would become useful as a set of pseudo-units to describe small values of miscellaneous dimensionless quantities. Marquis de Condorcet, in 1768, advanced the partial differential sign (∂), known as the curly d or Jacobi's delta. The prime symbol (′) for derivatives was made by Joseph-Louis Lagrange.

But in our opinion truths of this kind should be drawn from notions rather than from notations.

— Carl Friedrich Gauss, writing about the proof of Wilson's theorem⁷³

Gauss, Hamilton, and matrix notations

At the turn of the 19th century, Carl Friedrich Gauss developed the identity sign for congruence relation and, in quadratic reciprocity, the integral part. Gauss developed functions of complex variables, functions of geometry, and functions for the convergence of series. He devised satisfactory proofs of the fundamental theorem of algebra and the quadratic reciprocity law. Gauss developed the Gaussian elimination method of solving linear systems, which was initially listed as an advancement in geodesy.⁷⁴ He would also develop the product sign ( ∏ {\textstyle \textstyle \prod } ).

In the 1800s, Christian Kramp promoted factorial notation during his research in generalized factorial function which applied to non-integers.⁷⁵ Joseph Diaz Gergonne introduced the set inclusion signs (⊆, ⊇), later redeveloped by Ernst Schröder. Peter Gustav Lejeune Dirichlet developed Dirichlet L-functions to give the proof of Dirichlet's theorem on arithmetic progressions and began analytic number theory. In 1829, Carl Gustav Jacob Jacobi published Fundamenta nova theoriae functionum ellipticarum with his elliptic theta functions.

Matrix notation would be more fully developed by Arthur Cayley in his three papers, on subjects which had been suggested by reading the Mécanique analytique⁷⁶ of Lagrange and some of the works of Laplace. Cayley defined matrix multiplication and matrix inverses. Cayley used a single letter to denote a matrix,⁷⁷ thus treating a matrix as an aggregate object. He also realized the connection between matrices and determinants,⁷⁸ and wrote "There would be many things to say about this theory of matrices which should, it seems to me, precede the theory of determinants."⁷⁹

William Rowan Hamilton introduced the nabla symbol ( ∇ {\displaystyle \nabla } or, later called del, ∇) for vector differentials.⁸⁰⁸¹ This was previously used by Hamilton as a general-purpose operator sign.⁸² H ^ {\displaystyle {\hat {H}}} , H {\displaystyle H} , and H ˇ {\displaystyle {\check {H}}} are used for the Hamiltonian operator in quantum mechanics and H {\displaystyle {\mathcal {H}}} (or ℋ ) for the Hamiltonian function in classical Hamiltonian mechanics. In mathematics, Hamilton is perhaps best known as the inventor of quaternion notation and biquaternions.

Maxwell, Clifford, and Ricci notations

In 1864 James Clerk Maxwell reduced all of the then-current knowledge of electromagnetism into a linked set of differential equations with 20 equations in 20 variables, contained in A Dynamical Theory of the Electromagnetic Field.⁸³ (See Maxwell's equations.) The method of calculation that is necessary to employ was given by Lagrange, and afterwards developed, with some modifications, by Hamilton's equations. It is usually referred to as Hamilton's principle; when the equations in the original form are used, they are known as Lagrange's equations. In 1871 Richard Dedekind defined a field to be a set of real or complex numbers which is closed under the four arithmetic operations. In 1873 Maxwell presented A Treatise on Electricity and Magnetism.

In 1878 William Kingdon Clifford published his Elements of Dynamic.⁸⁴ Clifford developed split-biquaternions (e.g. q = w + x i + y j + z k {\displaystyle q=w+xi+yj+zk} ) which he called algebraic motors. Clifford obviated quaternion study by separating the dot product and cross product of two vectors from the complete quaternion notation.

The common vector notations are used when working with spatial vectors or more abstract members of vector spaces, while angle notation (or phasor notation) is a notation used in electronics.

Lord Kelvin's aetheric atom theory (1860s) led Peter Guthrie Tait, in 1885, to publish a topological table of knots with up to ten crossings known as the Tait conjectures. Tensor calculus was developed by Gregorio Ricci-Curbastro between 1887 and 1896, presented in 1892 under the title Absolute differential calculus,⁸⁵ and the contemporary usage of "tensor" was stated by Woldemar Voigt in 1898.⁸⁶ In 1895, Henri Poincaré published Analysis Situs.⁸⁷ In 1897, Charles Proteus Steinmetz would publish Theory and Calculation of Alternating Current Phenomena, with the assistance of Ernst J. Berg.⁸⁸

From formula mathematics to tensors

In 1895 Giuseppe Peano issued his Formulario mathematico,⁸⁹ an effort to digest mathematics into terse text based on special symbols. He would provide a definition of a vector space and linear map. He would also introduce the intersection sign ( ∩ {\displaystyle \cap } ), the union sign ( ∪ {\displaystyle \cup } ), the membership sign (∈), and existential quantifier (∃). Peano would pass to Bertrand Russell his work in 1900 at a Paris conference; it so impressed Russell that he too was taken with the drive to render mathematics more concisely. The result was Principia Mathematica written with Alfred North Whitehead. This treatise marks a watershed in modern literature where symbol became dominant. Peano's Formulario Mathematico, though less popular than Russell's work, continued through five editions. The fifth appeared in 1908 and included 4,200 formulas and theorems.

Ricci-Curbastro and Tullio Levi-Civita popularized the tensor index notation around 1900.⁹⁰

Mathematical logic and abstraction

Abstraction

Georg Cantor introduced Aleph numbers, so named because they use the aleph symbol (א) with natural number subscripts to denote cardinality in infinite sets. For the ordinals he employed the Greek letter ω (omega). This notation is still in use today in ordinal notation of a finite sequence of symbols from a finite alphabet that names an ordinal number according to some scheme which gives meaning to the language.

After the turn of the 20th century, Josiah Willard Gibbs introduced into physical chemistry the middle dot for dot product and the multiplication sign for cross products. He also supplied notation for the scalar and vector products, which were introduced in Vector Analysis. Bertrand Russell shortly afterward introduced logical disjunction (or) in 1906. Gerhard Kowalewski and Cuthbert Edmund Cullis⁹¹⁹²⁹³ introduced and helped standardized matrices notation, and parenthetical matrix and box matrix notation, respectively.

Albert Einstein, in 1916, introduced Einstein notation, which summed over a set of indexed terms in a formula, thus exerting notational brevity. For example, for indices ranging over the set {1, 2, 3},

y = ∑ i = 1 3 c i x i = c 1 x 1 + c 2 x 2 + c 3 x 3 {\displaystyle y=\sum _{i=1}^{3}c_{i}x^{i}=c_{1}x^{1}+c_{2}x^{2}+c_{3}x^{3}}

is reduced by convention to:

y = c i x i . {\displaystyle y=c_{i}x^{i}\,.}

Upper indices are not exponents but are indices of coordinates, coefficients, or basis vectors.

In 1917 Arnold Sommerfeld created the contour integral sign, and Dimitry Mirimanoff proposed the axiom of regularity. In 1919, Theodor Kaluza would solve general relativity equations using five dimensions, the results would have electromagnetic equations emerge.⁹⁴ This would be published in 1921 in "Zum Unitätsproblem der Physik".⁹⁵ In 1922, Abraham Fraenkel and Thoralf Skolem independently proposed replacing the axiom schema of specification with the axiom schema of replacement. Also in 1922, Zermelo–Fraenkel set theory was developed. In 1923, Steinmetz would publish Four Lectures on Relativity and Space. Around 1924, Jan Arnoldus Schouten developed the modern notation and formalism for the Ricci calculus framework during the absolute differential calculus applications to general relativity and differential geometry in the early twentieth century. Ricci calculus constitutes the rules of index notation and manipulation for tensors and tensor fields.^96979899 In 1925, Enrico Fermi described a system comprising many identical particles that obey the Pauli exclusion principle, afterwards developing a diffusion equation (Fermi age equation). In 1926, Oskar Klein develop the Kaluza–Klein theory. In 1928, Emil Artin abstracted ring theory with Artinian rings. In 1933, Andrey Kolmogorov introduces the Kolmogorov axioms. In 1937, Bruno de Finetti deduced the "operational subjective" concept.

Mathematical symbolism

See also: Category theory, Model theory, Table of logic symbols, and Logic alphabet

Mathematical abstraction began as a process of extracting the underlying essence of a mathematical concept,¹⁰⁰¹⁰¹ removing any dependence on real world objects with which it might originally have been connected,¹⁰² and generalizing it so that it has wider applications or matching among other abstract descriptions of equivalent phenomena. Two abstract areas of modern mathematics are category theory and model theory. Bertrand Russell¹⁰³ once said, "Ordinary language is totally unsuited for expressing what physics really asserts, since the words of everyday life are not sufficiently abstract. Only mathematics and mathematical logic can say as little as the physicist means to say." Though, one can substitute mathematics for real world objects, and wander off through equation after equation, and can build a concept structure which has no relation to reality.¹⁰⁴

Some of the introduced mathematical logic notation during this time included the set of symbols used in Boolean algebra. This was created by George Boole in 1854. Boole himself did not see logic as a branch of mathematics, but it has come to be encompassed anyway. Symbols found in Boolean algebra include ∧ {\displaystyle \land } (and), ∨ {\displaystyle \lor } (or), and ¬ {\displaystyle \lnot } (not). With these symbols, and letters to represent different truth values, one can make logical statements such as a ∨ ¬ a = 1 {\displaystyle a\lor \lnot a=1} , that is "(a is true or a is not true) is true", meaning it is true that a is either true or not true (i.e. false). Boolean algebra has many practical uses as it is, but it also was the start of what would be a large set of symbols to be used in logic. Most of these symbols can be found in propositional calculus, a formal system described as L = L   ( A ,   Ω ,   Z ,   I ) {\displaystyle {\mathcal {L}}={\mathcal {L}}\ (\mathrm {A} ,\ \Omega ,\ \mathrm {Z} ,\ \mathrm {I} )} . A {\displaystyle \mathrm {A} } is the set of elements, such as the a in the example with Boolean algebra above. Ω {\displaystyle \Omega } is the set that contains the subsets that contain operations, such as ∨ {\displaystyle \lor } or ∧ {\displaystyle \land } . Z {\displaystyle \mathrm {Z} } contains the inference rules, which are the rules dictating how inferences may be logically made, and I {\displaystyle \mathrm {I} } contains the axioms. Predicate logic, originally called predicate calculus, expands on propositional logic by the introduction of variables, usually denoted by x, y, z, or other lowercase letters, and by sentences containing variables, called predicates. These are usually denoted by an uppercase letter followed by a list of variables, such as P(x) or Q(y,z). Predicate logic uses special symbols for quantifiers: ∃ for "there exists" and ∀ for "for all".

Gödel incompleteness notation

See also: Proof sketch for Gödel's first incompleteness theorem

To every ω-consistent recursive class κ of formulae there correspond recursive class signs r, such that neither v Gen r nor Neg (v Gen r) belongs to Flg (κ) (where v is the free variable of r).

— Kurt Gödel¹⁰⁵

While proving his incompleteness theorems, Kurt Gödel created an alternative to the symbols normally used in logic. He used Gödel numbers—numbers assigned to represent mathematical operations—and variables with the prime numbers greater than 10. With Gödel numbers, a logic statement can be broken down into a number sequence. By taking the n prime numbers to the power of the Gödel numbers in the sequence, and then multiplying the terms together, a unique final product is generated. In this way, every logic statement can be encoded as its own number.¹⁰⁶

For example, take the statement "There exists a number x such that it is not y". Using the symbols of propositional calculus, this would become

( ∃ x ) ( x = ¬ y ) {\displaystyle (\exists x)(x=\lnot y)} .

If the Gödel numbers replace the symbols, it becomes:

{ 8 , 4 , 11 , 9 , 8 , 11 , 5 , 1 , 13 , 9 } {\displaystyle \{8,4,11,9,8,11,5,1,13,9\}} .

There are ten numbers, so the first ten prime numbers are used:

{ 2 , 3 , 5 , 7 , 11 , 13 , 17 , 19 , 23 , 29 } {\displaystyle \{2,3,5,7,11,13,17,19,23,29\}} .

Then, each prime is raised to the power of the corresponding Gödel number, and multiplied:

2 8 × 3 4 × 5 11 × 7 9 × 11 8 × 13 11 × 17 5 × 19 1 × 23 13 × 29 9 {\displaystyle 2^{8}\times 3^{4}\times 5^{11}\times 7^{9}\times 11^{8}\times 13^{11}\times 17^{5}\times 19^{1}\times 23^{13}\times 29^{9}} .

The resulting number is approximately 3.096262735 × 10 78 {\displaystyle 3.096262735\times 10^{78}} .

Contemporary notation and topics

Early 20th-century notation

The abstraction of notation is an ongoing process. The historical development of many mathematical topics exhibits a progression from the concrete to the abstract. Throughout 20th century, various set notations were developed for fundamental object sets. Around 1924, David Hilbert and Richard Courant published Methods of mathematical physics. Partial differential equations.¹⁰⁷ In 1926, Oskar Klein and Walter Gordon proposed the Klein–Gordon equation to describe relativistic particles:

1 c 2 ∂ 2 ∂ t 2 ψ − ∇ 2 ψ + m 2 c 2 ℏ 2 ψ = 0. {\displaystyle {\frac {1}{c^{2}}}{\frac {\partial ^{2}}{\partial t^{2}}}\psi -\nabla ^{2}\psi +{\frac {m^{2}c^{2}}{\hbar ^{2}}}\psi =0.}

The first formulation of a quantum theory describing radiation and matter interaction is due to Paul Adrien Maurice Dirac, who, during 1920, was first able to compute the coefficient of spontaneous emission of an atom.¹⁰⁸ In 1928, the relativistic Dirac equation was formulated by Dirac to explain the behavior of the relativistically moving electron. The Dirac equation in the form originally proposed by Dirac is:

( β m c 2 + ∑ k = 1 3 α k p k c ) ψ ( x , t ) = i ℏ ∂ ψ ( x , t ) ∂ t {\displaystyle \left(\beta mc^{2}+\sum _{k=1}^{3}\alpha _{k}p_{k}\,c\right)\psi (\mathbf {x} ,t)=i\hbar {\frac {\partial \psi (\mathbf {x} ,t)}{\partial t}}}

where, ψ = ψ(x, t) is the wave function for the electron, x and t are the space and time coordinates, m is the rest mass of the electron, p is the momentum (understood to be the momentum operator in the Schrödinger theory), c is the speed of light, and ħ = h/2π is the reduced Planck constant. Dirac described the quantification of the electromagnetic field as an ensemble of harmonic oscillators with the introduction of the concept of creation and annihilation operators of particles. In the following years, with contributions from Wolfgang Pauli, Eugene Wigner, Pascual Jordan, and Werner Heisenberg, and an elegant formulation of quantum electrodynamics due to Enrico Fermi,¹⁰⁹ physicists came to believe that, in principle, it would be possible to perform any computation for any physical process involving photons and charged particles.

In 1931, Alexandru Proca developed the Proca equation (Euler–Lagrange equation) for the vector meson theory of nuclear forces and the relativistic quantum field equations. John Archibald Wheeler in 1937 developed the S-matrix. Studies by Felix Bloch with Arnold Nordsieck,¹¹⁰ and Victor Weisskopf,¹¹¹ in 1937 and 1939, revealed that such computations were reliable only at a first order of perturbation theory, a problem already pointed out by Robert Oppenheimer.¹¹² Infinities emerged at higher orders in the series, making such computations meaningless and casting serious doubts on the internal consistency of the theory itself. With no solution for this problem known at the time, it appeared that a fundamental incompatibility existed between special relativity and quantum mechanics.

In the 1930s, the double-struck capital Z ( Z {\displaystyle \mathbb {Z} } ) for integer number sets was created by Edmund Landau. Nicolas Bourbaki created the double-struck capital Q ( Q {\displaystyle \mathbb {Q} } ) for rational number sets. In 1935 Gerhard Gentzen made universal quantifiers. André Weil and Nicolas Bourbaki would develop the empty set sign (∅) in 1939. That same year, Nathan Jacobson would coin the double-struck capital C ( C {\displaystyle \mathbb {C} } ) for complex number sets.

Around the 1930s, Voigt notation (so named to honor Voigt's 1898 work) would be developed for multilinear algebra as a way to represent a symmetric tensor by reducing its order. Schönflies notation became one of two conventions used to describe point groups (the other being Hermann–Mauguin notation). Also in this time, van der Waerden notation¹¹³¹¹⁴ became popular for the usage of two-component spinors (Weyl spinors) in four spacetime dimensions. Arend Heyting would introduce Heyting algebra and Heyting arithmetic.

The arrow (→) was developed for function notation in 1936 by Øystein Ore to denote images of specific elements and to denote Galois connections. Later, in 1940, it took its present form (f: X→Y) through the work of Witold Hurewicz. Werner Heisenberg, in 1941, proposed the S-matrix theory of particle interactions.

Bra–ket notation (Dirac notation) is a standard notation for describing quantum states, composed of angle brackets and vertical bars. It can also be used to denote abstract vectors and linear functionals. It is so called because the inner product (or dot product on a complex vector space) of two states is denoted by a ⟨bra|ket⟩: ⟨ ϕ | ψ ⟩ {\displaystyle \langle \phi |\psi \rangle } . The notation was introduced in 1939 by Paul Dirac,¹¹⁵ though the notation has precursors in Grassmann's use of the notation [φ|ψ] for his inner products nearly 100 years previously.¹¹⁶

Bra–ket notation is widespread in quantum mechanics: almost every phenomenon that is explained using quantum mechanics—including a large portion of modern physics—is usually explained with the help of bra–ket notation. The notation establishes an encoded abstract representation-independence, producing a versatile specific representation (e.g., x, or p, or eigenfunction base) without much ado, or excessive reliance on, the nature of the linear spaces involved. The overlap expression ⟨φ|ψ⟩ is typically interpreted as the probability amplitude for the state ψ to collapse into the state ϕ. The Feynman slash notation (Dirac slash notation¹¹⁷) was developed by Richard Feynman for the study of Dirac fields in quantum field theory.

Geoffrey Chew, along with others, would promote matrix notation for the strong interaction in particle physics, and the associated bootstrap principle, in 1960. In the 1960s, set-builder notation was developed for describing a set by stating the properties that its members must satisfy. Also in the 1960s, tensors are abstracted within category theory by means of the concept of monoidal category. Later, multi-index notation eliminates conventional notions used in multivariable calculus, partial differential equations, and the theory of distributions, by abstracting the concept of an integer index to an ordered tuple of indices.

Modern mathematical notation

See also: Approximation theory, Universal property, Tensor algebra, Free algebra, and Abstract algebra

In the modern mathematics of special relativity, electromagnetism, and wave theory, the d'Alembert operator ( ◻ {\displaystyle \scriptstyle \Box } ) is the Laplace operator of Minkowski space. The Levi-Civita symbol (ε), also known as the permutation symbol, is used in tensor calculus.

Feynman diagrams are used in particle physics, equivalent to the operator-based approach of Sin-Itiro Tomonaga and Julian Schwinger. The orbifold notation system, invented by William Thurston, has been developed for representing types of symmetry groups in two-dimensional spaces of constant curvature.

The tetrad formalism (tetrad index notation) was introduced as an approach to general relativity that replaces the choice of a coordinate basis by the less restrictive choice of a local basis for the tangent bundle (a locally defined set of four linearly independent vector fields called a tetrad).¹¹⁸

In the 1990s, Roger Penrose proposed Penrose graphical notation (tensor diagram notation) as a, usually handwritten, visual depiction of multilinear functions or tensors.¹¹⁹ Penrose also introduced abstract index notation. His usage of the Einstein summation was in order to offset the inconvenience in describing contractions and covariant differentiation in modern abstract tensor notation, while maintaining explicit covariance of the expressions involved.

John Conway furthered various notations, including the Conway chained arrow notation, the Conway notation of knot theory, and the Conway polyhedron notation. The Coxeter notation system classifies symmetry groups, describing the angles between with fundamental reflections of a Coxeter group. It uses a bracketed notation, with modifiers to indicate certain subgroups. The notation is named after H. S. M. Coxeter; Norman Johnson more comprehensively defined it.

Combinatorial LCF notation, devised by Joshua Lederberg and extended by Harold Scott MacDonald Coxeter and Robert Frucht, was developed for the representation of cubic graphs that are Hamiltonian.¹²⁰¹²¹ The cycle notation is the convention for writing down a permutation in terms of its constituent cycles.¹²² This is also called circular notation and the permutation called a cyclic or circular permutation.¹²³

Computers and markup notation

Main articles: History of computing and Timeline of computing

See also: Symbolic computation, Symbolic dynamics, Computational complexity theory, Mathematical markup language, MathML, Basic Linear Algebra Subprograms, Numerical linear algebra, List of numerical libraries, List of numerical-analysis software, DOT language, Lisp (programming language), Object-oriented programming, and Earley algorithm

In 1931, IBM produces the IBM 601 Multiplying Punch; it is an electromechanical machine that could read two numbers, up to eight digits long, from a card and punch their product onto the same card.¹²⁴ In 1934, Wallace Eckert used a rigged IBM 601 Multiplying Punch to automate the integration of differential equations.¹²⁵

In 1962, Kenneth E. Iverson developed an integral part notation, which became known as Iverson notation, that developed into APL.¹²⁶ In the 1970s within computer architecture, Quote notation was developed for a representing number system of rational numbers. Also in this decade, the Z notation (just like the APL language, long before it) uses many non-ASCII symbols, the specification includes suggestions for rendering the Z notation symbols in ASCII and in LaTeX. There are presently various C mathematical functions (Math.h) and numerical libraries used to perform numerical calculations in software development. These calculations can be handled by symbolic executions—analyzing a program to determine what inputs cause each part of a program to execute. Mathematica and SymPy are examples of computational software programs based on symbolic mathematics.

References and citations

General

• Florian Cajori (1929) A History of Mathematical Notations, 2 vols. Dover reprint in 1 vol., 1993. ISBN 0-486-67766-4.

Citations

Further reading

General

• A Short Account of the History of Mathematics. By Walter William Rouse Ball.
• A Primer of the History of Mathematics. By Walter William Rouse Ball.
• A History of Elementary Mathematics: With Hints on Methods of Teaching. By Florian Cajori.
• A History of Elementary Mathematics. By Florian Cajori.
• A History of Mathematics. By Florian Cajori.
• A Short History of Greek Mathematics. By James Gow.
• On the Development of Mathematical Thought During the Nineteenth Century. By John Theodore Merz.
• A New Mathematical and Philosophical Dictionary. By Peter Barlow.
• Historical Introduction to Mathematical Literature. By George Abram Miller
• A Brief History of Mathematics. By Karl Fink, Wooster Woodruff Beman, David Eugene Smith
• History of Modern Mathematics. By David Eugene Smith.
• History of modern mathematics. By David Eugene Smith, Mansfield Merriman.

Other

• Principia Mathematica, Volume 1 & Volume 2. By Alfred North Whitehead, Bertrand Russell.
• The Mathematical Principles of Natural Philosophy, Volume 1, Issue 1. By Sir Isaac Newton, Andrew Motte, William Davis, John Machin, William Emerson.
• General investigations of curved surfaces of 1827 and 1825. By Carl Friedrich Gaus.

External links

• Mathematical Notation: Past and Future
• History of Mathematical Notation
• Earliest Uses of Mathematical Notation
• Finger counting. files.chem.vt.edu.
• Some Common Mathematical Symbols and Abbreviations (with History). Isaiah Lankham, Bruno Nachtergaele, Anne Schilling.

References

1. Florian Cajori. A History of Mathematical Notations: Two Volumes in One. Cosimo, Inc., 1 Dec 2011 /wiki/Florian_Cajori ↩

2. A Dictionary of Science, Literature, & Art, Volume 2. Edited by William Thomas Brande, George William Cox. Pg 683 /wiki/William_Thomas_Brande ↩

3. "Notation – from Wolfram MathWorld". Mathworld.wolfram.com. Retrieved 24 June 2014. http://mathworld.wolfram.com/Notation.html ↩

4. Diophantos of Alexandria: A Study in the History of Greek Algebra. By Sir Thomas Little Heath. Pg 77. https://archive.org/details/diophantosalexa00heatgoog/page/n91 ↩

5. Mathematics: Its Power and Utility. By Karl J. Smith. Pg 86. https://books.google.com/books?id=-0x2JszrkooC&pg=PA86 ↩

6. The Commercial Revolution and the Beginnings of Western Mathematics in Renaissance Florence, 1300–1500. Warren Van Egmond. 1976. Page 233. ↩

7. Solomon Gandz. "The Sources of al-Khowarizmi's Algebra" /wiki/Solomon_Gandz ↩

8. Melville, Duncan J. (28 August 2003). "Third Millennium Chronology". stlawu.edu. Archived from the original on 15 January 2020. Retrieved 2 January 2025. http://web.archive.org/web/20200115175552/http://it.stlawu.edu:80/~dmelvill/mesomath/3Mill/chronology.html ↩

9. Boyer, C. B. A History of Mathematics, 2nd ed. rev. by Uta C. Merzbach. New York: Wiley, 1989 ISBN 0-471-09763-2 (1991 pbk ed. ISBN 0-471-54397-7). "Mesopotamia" p. 25. /wiki/Uta_Merzbach ↩

10. Aaboe, Asger (1998). Episodes from the Early History of Mathematics. New York: Random House. pp. 30–31. /wiki/Aaboe ↩

11. "Mathematics in Egypt and Mesopotamia" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 28 December 2022. Retrieved 25 July 2013. https://web.archive.org/web/20221228002317/http://www.metu.edu.tr/~beyaz/303/presentations/egyptMesopotamia.pdf ↩

12. Encyclopædia Americana. By Thomas Gamaliel Bradford. Pg 314 https://books.google.com/books?id=hrRPAAAAMAAJ&pg=PA314 ↩

13. Mathematical Excursion, Enhanced Edition: Enhanced Webassign Edition By Richard N. Aufmann, Joanne Lockwood, Richard D. Nation, Daniel K. Cleg. Pg 186 https://books.google.com/books?id=GTgTnSGMukgC&pg=PA186 ↩

14. That is, a 2 + b 2 = c 2 {\displaystyle a^{2}+b^{2}=c^{2}} . ↩

15. Heath (1931). "A Manual of Greek Mathematics". Nature. 128 (3235): 5. Bibcode:1931Natur.128..739T. doi:10.1038/128739a0. S2CID 3994109. /wiki/Bibcode_(identifier) ↩

16. Sir Thomas L. Heath, A Manual of Greek Mathematics, Dover, 1963, p. 1: "In the case of mathematics, it is the Greek contribution which it is most essential to know, for it was the Greeks who made mathematics a science." ↩

17. The new encyclopædia; or, Universal dictionary of arts and sciences. By Encyclopaedia Perthensi. Pg 49 ↩

18. The new encyclopædia; or, Universal dictionary of arts and sciences. By Encyclopaedia Perthensi. Pg 49 ↩

19. Calinger, Ronald (1999). A Contextual History of Mathematics. Prentice-Hall. p. 150. ISBN 0-02-318285-7. Shortly after Euclid, compiler of the definitive textbook, came Archimedes of Syracuse (ca. 287 212 BC), the most original and profound mathematician of antiquity. 0-02-318285-7 ↩

20. "Archimedes of Syracuse". The MacTutor History of Mathematics archive. January 1999. Retrieved 9 June 2008. http://www-history.mcs.st-and.ac.uk/Biographies/Archimedes.html ↩

21. O'Connor, J.J.; Robertson, E.F. (February 1996). "A history of calculus". University of St Andrews. Archived from the original on 15 July 2007. Retrieved 7 August 2007. http://www-groups.dcs.st-and.ac.uk/~history/HistTopics/The_rise_of_calculus.html ↩

22. "Proclus' Summary". Gap.dcs.st-and.ac.uk. Archived from the original on 23 September 2015. Retrieved 24 June 2014. https://web.archive.org/web/20150923114020/http://www-gap.dcs.st-and.ac.uk/~history/Extras/Proclus_history_geometry.html ↩

23. Mathematics and Measurement By Oswald Ashton Wentworth Dilk. Pg 14 https://books.google.com/books?id=AKJZvXOS7n4C&pg=PA14 ↩

24. Mathematics and Measurement By Oswald Ashton Wentworth Dilk. Pg 14 https://books.google.com/books?id=AKJZvXOS7n4C&pg=PA14 ↩

25. Mathematics and Measurement By Oswald Ashton Wentworth Dilk. Pg 14 https://books.google.com/books?id=AKJZvXOS7n4C&pg=PA14 ↩

26. Boyer, Carl B. A History of Mathematics, 2nd edition, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 1991. ↩

27. A dictionary of science, literature and art, ed. by W.T. Brande. Pg 683 https://books.google.com/books?id=yo4DAAAAQAAJ&pg=PA683 ↩

28. Diophantine Equations. Submitted by: Aaron Zerhusen, Chris Rakes, & Shasta Meece. MA 330-002. Dr. Carl Eberhart. 16 February 1999. http://www.ms.uky.edu/~carl/ma330/projects/diophanfin1.html ↩

29. Heath, Sir Thomas Little (1921). A History of Greek Mathematics. Oxford : Clarendon Press. pp. 456, 458. https://archive.org/details/bub_gb_7DDQAAAAMAAJ/page/n472 ↩

30. The American Mathematical Monthly, Volume 16. Pg 131 https://books.google.com/books?id=JggPAAAAIAAJ&pg=PA131 ↩

31. "Overview of Chinese mathematics". Groups.dcs.st-and.ac.uk. Retrieved 24 June 2014. http://www-groups.dcs.st-and.ac.uk/~history/HistTopics/Chinese_overview.html ↩

32. George Gheverghese Joseph, The Crest of the Peacock: Non-European Roots of Mathematics, Penguin Books, London, 1991, pp. 140—148 ↩

33. Georges Ifrah, Universalgeschichte der Zahlen, Campus, Frankfurt/New York, 1986, pp. 428—437 ↩

34. "Frank J. Swetz and T. I. Kao: Was Pythagoras Chinese?". Psupress.psu.edu. Retrieved 24 June 2014. http://www.psupress.psu.edu/books/titles/0-271-01238-2.html ↩

35. Needham, Joseph (1986). Science and Civilization in China: Volume 3, Mathematics and the Sciences of the Heavens and the Earth. Taipei: Caves Books, Ltd. ↩

36. Needham, Joseph (1986). Science and Civilization in China: Volume 3, Mathematics and the Sciences of the Heavens and the Earth. Taipei: Caves Books, Ltd. ↩

37. Sal Restivo /wiki/Sal_Restivo ↩

38. Needham, Joseph (1986). Science and Civilization in China: Volume 3, Mathematics and the Sciences of the Heavens and the Earth. Taipei: Caves Books, Ltd. ↩

39. Marcel Gauchet, 151. /wiki/Marcel_Gauchet ↩

40. Robert Kaplan, "The Nothing That Is: A Natural History of Zero", Allen Lane/The Penguin Press, London, 1999 ↩

41. O'Connor, J. J.; Robertson, E. F. (November 2000). "Indian numerals". Archived from the original on 22 October 2019. Retrieved 24 June 2014. "The ingenious method of expressing every possible number using a set of ten symbols (each symbol having a place value and an absolute value) emerged in India. The idea seems so simple nowadays that its significance and profound importance is no longer appreciated. Its simplicity lies in the way it facilitated calculation and placed arithmetic foremost amongst useful inventions. the importance of this invention is more readily appreciated when one considers that it was beyond the two greatest men of Antiquity, Archimedes and Apollonius." – Pierre-Simon Laplace https://web.archive.org/web/20191022210400/http://www-history.mcs.st-and.ac.uk/HistTopics/Indian_numerals.html ↩

42. A.P. Juschkewitsch, "Geschichte der Mathematik im Mittelalter", Teubner, Leipzig, 1964 /wiki/Adolf_Yushkevich ↩

43. Boyer, C. B. (1989). "China and India". In Uta C. Merzbach (ed.). A History of Mathematics (2nd ed.). New York: Wiley. p. 221. ISBN 0-471-09763-2. [...] he was the first one to give a general solution of the linear Diophantine equation ax + by = c, where a, b, and c are integers. [...] It is greatly to the credit of Brahmagupta that he gave all integral solutions of the linear Diophantine equation, whereas Diophantus himself had been satisfied to give one particular solution of an indeterminate equation. Inasmuch as Brahmagupta used some of the same examples as Diophantus, we see again the likelihood of Greek influence in India – or the possibility that they both made use of a common source, possibly from Babylonia. It is interesting to note also that the algebra of Brahmagupta, like that of Diophantus, was syncopated. Addition was indicated by juxtaposition, subtraction by placing a dot over the subtrahend, and division by placing the divisor below the dividend, as in our fractional notation but without the bar. The operations of multiplication and evolution (the taking of roots), as well as unknown quantities, were represented by abbreviations of appropriate words. 0-471-09763-2 ↩

44. Kunitzsch, Paul (2003), "The Transmission of Hindu-Arabic Numerals Reconsidered", in J. P. Hogendijk; A. I. Sabra (eds.), The Enterprise of Science in Islam: New Perspectives, MIT Press, pp. 3–22 (12–13), ISBN 978-0-262-19482-2 978-0-262-19482-2 ↩

45. Marie-Thérèse d'Alverny, "Translations and Translators", pp. 421–62 in Robert L. Benson and Giles Constable, Renaissance and Renewal in the Twelfth Century, (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1982). /wiki/Marie-Th%C3%A9r%C3%A8se_d%27Alverny ↩

46. Guy Beaujouan, "The Transformation of the Quadrivium", pp. 463–87 in Robert L. Benson and Giles Constable, Renaissance and Renewal in the Twelfth Century, (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1982). ↩

47. O'Connor, John J.; Robertson, Edmund F., "al-Marrakushi ibn Al-Banna", MacTutor History of Mathematics Archive, University of St Andrews /wiki/Edmund_F._Robertson ↩

48. Gullberg, Jan (1997). Mathematics: From the Birth of Numbers. W. W. Norton. p. 298. ISBN 0-393-04002-X. 0-393-04002-X ↩

49. O'Connor, John J.; Robertson, Edmund F., "Abu'l Hasan ibn Ali al Qalasadi", MacTutor History of Mathematics Archive, University of St Andrews /wiki/Edmund_F._Robertson ↩

50. Boyer, C. B. (1989). "Revival and Decline of Greek Mathematics". In Uta C. Merzbach (ed.). A History of Mathematics (2nd ed.). New York: Wiley. p. 178. ISBN 0-471-09763-2. The chief difference between Diophantine syncopation and the modern algebraic notation is the lack of special symbols for operations and relations, as well as of the exponential notation. 0-471-09763-2 ↩

51. O'Connor, John J.; Robertson, Edmund F., "Abu'l Hasan ibn Ali al Qalasadi", MacTutor History of Mathematics Archive, University of St Andrews /wiki/Edmund_F._Robertson ↩

52. Grant, Edward and John E. Murdoch (1987), eds., Mathematics and Its Applications to Science and Natural Philosophy in the Middle Ages, (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press) ISBN 0-521-32260-X. /wiki/ISBN_(identifier) ↩

53. Mathematical Magazine, Volume 1. Artemas Martin, 1887. Pg 124 https://books.google.com/books?id=mG8yAQAAMAAJ&pg=PA124 ↩

54. Der Algorismus proportionum des Nicolaus Oresme: Zum ersten Male nach der Lesart der Handschrift R.40.2. der Königlichen Gymnasial-bibliothek zu Thorn. Nicole Oresme. S. Calvary & Company, 1868. https://books.google.com/books?id=k0U1AQAAMAAJ ↩

55. Clagett, Marshall (1961) The Science of Mechanics in the Middle Ages, (Madison: University of Wisconsin Press), pp. 332–45, 382–91. ↩

56. Later, early modern version: Michael Walsh. (1801). A New System of Mercantile Arithmetic: Adapted to the Commerce of the United States, in Its Domestic and Foreign Relations with Forms of Accounts and Other Writings Usually Occurring in Trade. Edmund M. Blunt.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list (link) /w/index.php?title=Michael_Walsh_(1801)&action=edit&redlink=1 ↩

57. Miller, Jeff (4 June 2006). "Earliest Uses of Symbols of Operation". Gulf High School. Retrieved 24 September 2006. http://jeff560.tripod.com/operation.html ↩

58. Arithmetical Books from the Invention of Printing to the Present Time. By Augustus De Morgan. p 2. /wiki/Augustus_De_Morgan ↩

59. Arithmetica integra. By Michael Stifel, Philipp Melanchton. Norimbergæ: Apud Iohan Petreium, 1544. //archive.org/details/bub_gb_fndPsRv08R0C ↩

60. Rooney, Anne (15 July 2012). The History of Mathematics. Rosen Publishing Group, Inc. p. 40. ISBN 978-1-4488-7369-2. 978-1-4488-7369-2 ↩

61. Napier, Mark (1834). Memoirs of John Napier of Merchiston, his lineage, life, and times, with a history of the invention of logarithms. William Blackwood, Edinburgh, and Thomas Cadell, London. https://archive.org/details/memoirsjohnnapi00napigoog ↩

62. David Stewart Erskine Earl of Buchan; Minto, Walter (1787). An Account of the Life, Writings, and Inventions of John Napier, of Merchiston. R. Morison, junr. https://books.google.com/books?id=JUdkAAAAMAAJ ↩

63. Cajori, Florian (1919). A History of Mathematics. Macmillan. p. 157. /wiki/Florian_Cajori ↩

64. Synopsis Palmariorum Matheseos. By William Jones. 1706. (Alt: Synopsis Palmariorum Matheseos: or, a New Introduction to the Mathematics. archive.org.) https://books.google.com/books?id=b59EAAAAcAAJ ↩

65. When Less is More: Visualizing Basic Inequalities. By Claudi Alsina, Roger B. Nelse. Pg 18. https://books.google.com/books?id=U1ovBsSRNscC&pg=PR18 ↩

66. A dictionary of science, literature and art, ed. by W.T. Brande. Pg 683 https://books.google.com/books?id=yo4DAAAAQAAJ&pg=PA683 ↩

67. A dictionary of science, literature and art, ed. by W.T. Brande. Pg 683 https://books.google.com/books?id=yo4DAAAAQAAJ&pg=PA683 ↩

68. A dictionary of science, literature and art, ed. by W.T. Brande. Pg 683 https://books.google.com/books?id=yo4DAAAAQAAJ&pg=PA683 ↩

69. A dictionary of science, literature and art, ed. by W.T. Brande. Pg 683 https://books.google.com/books?id=yo4DAAAAQAAJ&pg=PA683 ↩

70. Emerson, William (1794). The elements of geometry. London: F. Wingrave. https://archive.org/details/elementsgeometr00emergoog ↩

71. Emerson, William (1763). The Doctrine of Proportion, Arithmetical and Geometrical. Together with a General Method of Arening by Proportional Quantities. https://books.google.com/books?id=YLxHMwEACAAJ ↩

72. Baron, George (1804). The Mathematical Correspondent: Containing New Eludications, Discoveries, and Improvements, in Various Branches of the Mathematics. Sage and Clough. p. 83. https://books.google.com/books?id=IXkAAAAAMAAJ&pg=PA83 ↩

73. Disquisitiones Arithmeticae (1801) Article 76 /wiki/Disquisitiones_Arithmeticae ↩

74. Vitulli, Marie. "A Brief History of Linear Algebra and Matrix Theory". Department of Mathematics. University of Oregon. Archived from the original on 10 September 2012. Retrieved 24 January 2012. /wiki/Marie_A._Vitulli ↩

75. "Kramp biography". History.mcs.st-and.ac.uk. Retrieved 24 June 2014. http://www-history.mcs.st-and.ac.uk/Biographies/Kramp.html ↩

76. Mécanique analytique: Volume 1, Volume 2. By Joseph Louis Lagrange. Ms. Ve Courcier, 1811. //archive.org/details/mcaniqueanalyti06lagrgoog ↩

77. The collected mathematical papers of Arthur Cayley. Volume 11. Page 243. https://books.google.com/books?id=tZdQAAAAYAAJ ↩

78. Historical Encyclopedia of Natural and Mathematical Sciences, Volume 1. By Ari Ben-Menahem. Pg 2070. https://books.google.com/books?id=9tUrarQYhKMC&pg=PA2070 ↩

79. Vitulli, Marie. "A Brief History of Linear Algebra and Matrix Theory". Department of Mathematics. University of Oregon. Originally at: darkwing.uoregon.edu/~vitulli/441.sp04/LinAlgHistory.html /wiki/Marie_A._Vitulli ↩

80. The Words of Mathematics. By Steven Schwartzman. 6. https://archive.org/details/wordsofmathemati0000schw/page/6 ↩

81. Electro-Magnetism: Theory and Applications. By A. Pramanik. 38 https://books.google.com/books?id=gnEEwy12S5cC&pg=PA38 ↩

82. History of Nabla and Other Math Symbols. homepages.math.uic.edu/~hanson. http://homepages.math.uic.edu/~hanson/math210/nabla98symbols.html ↩

83. Maxwell, James Clerk (1865). "A dynamical theory of the electromagnetic field" (PDF). Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. 155: 459–512. Bibcode:1865RSPT..155..459M. doi:10.1098/rstl.1865.0008. S2CID 186207827. (This article accompanied an 8 December 1864 presentation by Maxwell to the Royal Society.) /wiki/James_Clerk_Maxwell ↩

84. Books I, II, III (1878) at the Internet Archive; Book IV (1887) at the Internet Archive https://archive.org/details/elementsofdynami01clifiala ↩

85. Ricci Curbastro, G. (1892). "Résumé de quelques travaux sur les systèmes variables de fonctions associés à une forme différentielle quadratique". Bulletin des Sciences Mathématiques. 2 (16): 167–189. ↩

86. Voigt, Woldemar (1898). Die fundamentalen physikalischen Eigenschaften der Krystalle in elementarer Darstellung. Leipzig: Von Veit. https://archive.org/details/bub_gb__Ps4AAAAMAAJ ↩

87. Poincaré, Henri, "Analysis situs", Journal de l'École Polytechnique ser 2, 1 (1895) pp. 1–123 ↩

88. Whitehead, John B. Jr. (1901). "Review: Alternating Current Phenomena, by C. P. Steinmetz" (PDF). Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. 7 (9): 399–408. doi:10.1090/s0002-9904-1901-00825-7. https://www.ams.org/journals/bull/1901-07-09/S0002-9904-1901-00825-7/S0002-9904-1901-00825-7.pdf ↩

89. There are many editions. Here are two: (French) Published 1901 by Gauthier-Villars, Paris. 230p. OpenLibrary OL15255022W, PDF. (Italian) Published 1960 by Edizione cremonese, Roma. 463p. OpenLibrary OL16587658M. https://openlibrary.org/works/OL15255022W/Formulaire_des_mathematiques ↩

90. Ricci, Gregorio; Levi-Civita, Tullio (March 1900), "Méthodes de calcul différentiel absolu et leurs applications", Mathematische Annalen, 54 (1–2), Springer: 125–201, doi:10.1007/BF01454201, S2CID 120009332 /wiki/Gregorio_Ricci-Curbastro ↩

91. Cullis, Cuthbert Edmund (March 2013). Matrices and determinoids. Vol. 2. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-1-107-62083-4. 978-1-107-62083-4 ↩

92. Can be assigned a given matrix: About a class of matrices. (Gr. Ueber eine Klasse von Matrizen: die sich einer gegebenen Matrix zuordnen lassen.) by Isay Schur https://books.google.com/books?id=Sp0KAAAAYAAJ ↩

93. An Introduction To The Modern Theory Of Equations. By Florian Cajori. https://archive.org/details/anintroductiont01cajogoog ↩

94. Proceedings of the Prussian Academy of Sciences (1918). Pg 966. ↩

95. Sitzungsberichte der Preussischen Akademie der Wissenschaften (1918) (Tr. Proceedings of the Prussian Academy of Sciences (1918)). archive.org; See also: Kaluza–Klein theory. https://archive.org/details/sitzungsberichte1921preussi ↩

96. Synge J.L.; Schild A. (1949). Tensor Calculus. first Dover Publications 1978 edition. pp. 6–108. ↩

97. J.A. Wheeler; C. Misner; K.S. Thorne (1973). Gravitation. W.H. Freeman & Co. pp. 85–86, §3.5. ISBN 0-7167-0344-0. 0-7167-0344-0 ↩

98. R. Penrose (2007). The Road to Reality. Vintage books. ISBN 978-0-679-77631-4. 978-0-679-77631-4 ↩

99. Schouten, Jan A. (1924). R. Courant (ed.). Der Ricci-Kalkül – Eine Einführung in die neueren Methoden und Probleme der mehrdimensionalen Differentialgeometrie (Ricci Calculus – An introduction in the latest methods and problems in multi-dimensional differential geometry). Grundlehren der mathematischen Wissenschaften (in German). Vol. 10. Berlin: Springer Verlag. http://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?PPN373339186 ↩

100. Robert B. Ash. A Primer of Abstract Mathematics. Cambridge University Press, 1 Jan 1998 ↩

101. The New American Encyclopedic Dictionary. Edited by Edward Thomas Roe, Le Roy Hooker, Thomas W. Handford. Pg 34 https://books.google.com/books?id=KhQLAQAAMAAJ&pg=PA34 ↩

102. The Mathematical Principles of Natural Philosophy, Volume 1. By Sir Isaac Newton, John Machin. Pg 12. ↩

103. In The Scientific Outlook (1931) ↩

104. Mathematics simplified and made attractive: or, The laws of motion explained. By Thomas Fisher. Pg 15. (cf. But an abstraction not founded upon, and not consonant with Nature and (Logical) Truth, would be a falsity, an insanity.) /wiki/Nature_(philosophy) ↩

105. Proposition VI, On Formally Undecidable Propositions in Principia Mathematica and Related Systems I (1931) /wiki/On_Formally_Undecidable_Propositions_of_Principia_Mathematica_and_Related_Systems ↩

106. Casti, John L. 5 Golden Rules. New York: MJF Books, 1996. ↩

107. Gr. Methoden Der Mathematischen Physik ↩

108. P.A.M. Dirac (1927). "The Quantum Theory of the Emission and Absorption of Radiation". Proceedings of the Royal Society of London A. 114 (767): 243–265. Bibcode:1927RSPSA.114..243D. doi:10.1098/rspa.1927.0039. /wiki/Paul_Adrien_Maurice_Dirac ↩

109. E. Fermi (1932). "Quantum Theory of Radiation". Reviews of Modern Physics. 4 (1): 87–132. Bibcode:1932RvMP....4...87F. doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.4.87. /wiki/Enrico_Fermi ↩

110. F. Bloch; A. Nordsieck (1937). "Note on the Radiation Field of the Electron". Physical Review. 52 (2): 54–59. Bibcode:1937PhRv...52...54B. doi:10.1103/PhysRev.52.54. /wiki/Felix_Bloch ↩

111. V. F. Weisskopf (1939). "On the Self-Energy and the Electromagnetic Field of the Electron". Physical Review. 56 (1): 72–85. Bibcode:1939PhRv...56...72W. doi:10.1103/PhysRev.56.72. /wiki/Victor_Weisskopf ↩

112. R. Oppenheimer (1930). "Note on the Theory of the Interaction of Field and Matter". Physical Review. 35 (5): 461–477. Bibcode:1930PhRv...35..461O. doi:10.1103/PhysRev.35.461. /wiki/Robert_Oppenheimer ↩

113. Van der Waerden B.L. (1929). "Spinoranalyse". Nachr. Ges. Wiss. Göttingen Math.-Phys. 1929: 100–109. ↩

114. Veblen O. (1933). "Geometry of two-component Spinors". Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 19 (4): 462–474. Bibcode:1933PNAS...19..462V. doi:10.1073/pnas.19.4.462. PMC 1086023. PMID 16577541. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1086023 ↩

115. Dirac, P.A.M. (1939). "A new notation for quantum mechanics". Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society. 35 (3): 416–418. Bibcode:1939PCPS...35..416D. doi:10.1017/S0305004100021162. S2CID 121466183. /wiki/Paul_Dirac ↩

116. H. Grassmann (1862). Extension Theory. History of Mathematics Sources. American Mathematical Society, London Mathematical Society, 2000 translation by Lloyd C. Kannenberg. ↩

117. Weinberg, Steven (1964), The quantum theory of fields, Volume 2, Cambridge University Press, 1995, p. 358, ISBN 0-521-55001-7 0-521-55001-7 ↩

118. De Felice, F.; Clarke, C.J.S. (1990), Relativity on Curved Manifolds, p. 133 ↩

119. "Quantum invariants of knots and 3-manifolds" by V. G. Turaev (1994), page 71 ↩

120. Pisanski, Tomaž; Servatius, Brigitte (2013), "2.3.2 Cubic graphs and LCF notation", Configurations from a Graphical Viewpoint, Springer, p. 32, ISBN 978-0-8176-8364-1 978-0-8176-8364-1 ↩

121. Frucht, R. (1976), "A canonical representation of trivalent Hamiltonian graphs", Journal of Graph Theory, 1 (1): 45–60, doi:10.1002/jgt.3190010111 /wiki/Journal_of_Graph_Theory ↩

122. Fraleigh 2002:89; Hungerford 1997:230 ↩

123. Dehn, Edgar. Algebraic Equations, Dover. 1930:19 ↩

124. "The IBM 601 Multiplying Punch". Columbia.edu. Retrieved 24 June 2014. http://www.columbia.edu/cu/computinghistory/601.html ↩

125. "Interconnected Punched Card Equipment". Columbia.edu. 24 October 1935. Retrieved 24 June 2014. http://www.columbia.edu/cu/computinghistory/switch.html ↩

126. McDonnell, Eugene, ed. (1981), A Source Book in APL, Introduction, APL Press, retrieved 19 April 2016 /wiki/Eugene_McDonnell ↩