Menu
Home Explore People Places Arts History Plants & Animals Science Life & Culture Technology
On this page
Extortion
Criminal offense of obtaining benefit through coercion

Extortion involves obtaining money or goods through coercion and is generally considered a criminal offence. Commonly practiced by organized crime, it includes actions like robbery and protection rackets, where payments are demanded in exchange for "protection" from threats, often from the same party. Legal definitions may criminalize even the threat of violence to secure benefits. Extortion can also refer to political corruption such as selling one’s office or influence peddling. Though sometimes confused with usury or price gouging, extortion specifically involves coercive threats to obtain benefit unlawfully and is also known as shakedown or exaction.

Related Image Collections Add Image
Profiles
1 Image
We don't have any YouTube videos related to Extortion yet.
We don't have any PDF documents related to Extortion yet.
We don't have any Books related to Extortion yet.

United States

Extortion is distinguished from robbery. In robbery, whether armed or not, the offender takes property from the victim by the immediate use of force or fear that force will be immediately used. Extortion, which is not limited to the taking of property, involves the verbal or written instillation of fear that something will happen to the victim if they do not comply with the extortionist's will. Another key distinction is that extortion always involves a verbal or written threat,7 whereas robbery may not. In United States federal law, extortion can be committed with or without the use of force and with or without the use of a weapon. Violation of many state extortion statutes constitutes "racketeering activity" under Section 1961 of the federal Racketeering Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act, 18 USC

In blackmail, which always involves extortion, the extortionist threatens to reveal information about a victim or their family members that is potentially embarrassing, socially damaging, or incriminating unless a demand for money, property, or services is met.8

In the United States, extortion may also be committed as a federal crime across a computer system, phone, by mail, or in using any instrument of interstate commerce. Extortion requires that the individual sent the message willingly and knowingly as elements of the crime. The message only has to be sent (but does not have to reach the intended recipient) to commit the crime of extortion.

United Kingdom

England and Wales

In England and Wales extorting property and money by coercion is the offence of blackmail which covers any "unwarranted demand with menaces" including physical threats. See section 21 of the Theft Act 1968 plus sections 29 and 30 of the Larceny Act 1916. A group of people may also be committing conspiracy.

Scotland

Extortion is a common law crime in Scotland of using threat of harm to demand money, property or some advantage from another person. It does not matter whether the demand itself is legitimate (such as for money owed) as the crime can still be committed when illegitimate threats of harm are used.910

Cyber extortion

Cyber extortion is when an individual or group uses the internet as a mean of demanding some sort of material gain. 11 The group or individual usually sends a company a threatening email stating that they have received confidential information about their company and will exploit a security leak or launch an attack that will harm the company's network. The message sent through the email usually demands money in exchange for the prevention of the attack.1213

Cases

In March 2008, Anthony Digati was arrested on federal charges of extortion through interstate communication. Digati put $50,000 into a variable life insurance policy by New York Life Insurance Company and wanted a return of $198,303.88. When the firm did not comply, he threatened to send out six million spam emails. He registered a domain in February 2008 that contained New York Life's name in the URL to display false public statements about the company and increased his demand to $3 million.14 According to prosecutors, Digati's intent was not to inform or educate but he wanted to "damage the reputation of New York Life and cost the company millions of dollars in revenue,".15 New York Life contacted the Federal Bureau of Investigation and Digati was apprehended.

On February 15, 2011, Spanish police apprehended a man who attempted to blackmail Nintendo over customer information he had stolen. The man stole personal information about 4,000 users and emailed Nintendo Ibérica, Nintendo's Spanish division, and accused the company of data negligence. He threatened the company that he would make the information public and complain to the Spanish Data Agency if his demands were not met. After Nintendo ignored his demands, he published some of the information on an Internet forum. Nintendo notified authorities and the man was arrested in Málaga. No information has been revealed as to what the man demanded from Nintendo.16

On February 7, 2019, Jeffrey P. Bezos, owner of Amazon and The Washington Post and currently one of the world's wealthiest people, accused the National Enquirer and its parent company American Media, Inc., of attempting to extort him by threatening to reveal nude pictures of him unless he publicly stated that he "[has] no knowledge or basis for suggesting that AMI's coverage was politically motivated or influenced by political forces." This threat was in response to Bezos investigating the tabloid for publishing details about his relationship with Lauren Sanchez, which led to Bezos and his wife Mackenzie announcing their divorce17 on January 9 of that year. Bezos refused and posted the threat on Medium.18

On October 21, 2020, the news sources reported that roughly 40,000 patient records had been stolen from the Finnish private health care provider Vastaamo.192021 The extorters demanded 40 bitcoins — roughly 450,000 euros at the time — or the stolen patient data would be published. The extorters published 100 patient records a day on a Tor message board to add pressure for their demands. The leaked patient records contained patients' full names, home addresses, social security numbers, and the therapists' and doctors' notes from each session.22 After the extortion of the company failed, the extorters sent victims an email demanding they pay either 200 euros within 24 hours or 500 euros in 48 hours in order to avoid publishing their sensitive personal data.23 The company's security practices were found to be inadequate: the sensitive data was not encrypted24 and apparently the system root password was very weak.25 The patient records were first accessed by intruders in November 2018, while the security flaws continued to exist until March 2019. The president of Finland described the cyber attack as "relentlessly cruel."26

Similar crimes

  • Badger game: The victim or "mark"—for example, such as a married person—is tricked into a compromising position to make them vulnerable to blackmail.
  • Clip joint: A clip joint or fleshpot is an establishment, usually a strip club or entertainment bar, typically one claiming to offer adult entertainment or bottle service, in which customers are tricked into paying money and receive poor goods or services, or none, in return. An example of this is portrayed in the comedy film Porky's.
  • Coercion: the practice of compelling a person or manipulating them to behave in an involuntary way (whether through action or inaction) by use of threats, intimidation, trickery, or some other form of pressure or force. These are used as leverage, to force the victim to act in the desired way.
  • Confidence trick (also known as a bunko, con, flim flam, gaffle, grift, hustle, scam, scheme, swindle, bamboozle or finesse): an attempt to defraud a person or group by gaining their confidence.
  • Cryptovirology: a software scam in which a public-key cryptography system crafts fake keys which encrypt the user's data, but cannot decrypt them unless the user pays for the real key.
  • Dognapping: The crime of taking a dog from its owner, which usually occurs in purebred dogs, the profit from which can run up to thousands of dollars.
  • Loan sharking: A loan shark is a person or body that offers unsecured loans at high interest rates to individuals, often backed by blackmail or threats of violence.
  • Price gouging: a pejorative term for a seller pricing much higher than is considered reasonable or fair. In precise, legal usage, it is the name of a felony that applies in some of the United States only during civil emergencies.
  • Racket: A service that is fraudulently offered to solve a problem, such as for a problem that does not actually exist, will not be affected, or would not otherwise exist.
  • Sextortion: Forcing individuals to send sexual images or perform sexual services.
  • Terrorism: most simply, policy intended to intimidate or cause terror. It is more commonly understood as an act which is intended to create fear (terror), is perpetrated for an ideological goal (as opposed to a materialistic goal or a lone attack), and deliberately target or disregard the safety of non-combatants. Some definitions also include acts of unlawful violence or unconventional warfare, but at present, the international community has been unable to formulate a universally agreed, legally binding, criminal law definition of terrorism.
  • Tiger kidnapping: the taking of an innocent hostage to make a loved one or associate of the victim do something, e.g. a child is taken hostage to force the shopkeeper to open the safe; the term originates from the prior observation of the victim, like a tiger does with its prey. Ransoms are often used alongside these.

See also

Look up extortion in Wiktionary, the free dictionary. Wikimedia Commons has media related to Extortion. Wikisource has the text of the 1905 New International Encyclopedia article "Extortion".

References

  1. Lindgren, James (April 1984). "Unraveling the Paradox of Blackmail". Columbia Law Review. 84 (3): 670–717. doi:10.2307/1122502. JSTOR 1122502. /wiki/Doi_(identifier) ↩

  2. "Exaction - definition of exaction by the Free Online Dictionary, Thesaurus and Encyclopedia". Thefreedictionary.com. Retrieved 2012-06-05. http://www.thefreedictionary.com/exaction ↩

  3. "Exact definition - Dictionary - MSN Encarta". Encarta Dictionary. Archived from the original on 2009-12-01. https://web.archive.org/web/20091201023124/http://encarta.msn.com/dictionary_1861609570/exact.html ↩

  4. Lindgren, James (April 1984). "Unraveling the Paradox of Blackmail". Columbia Law Review. 84 (3): 670–717. doi:10.2307/1122502. JSTOR 1122502. /wiki/Doi_(identifier) ↩

  5. "Extortion". Investopedia. Retrieved 2021-12-05. https://www.investopedia.com/terms/e/extortion.asp ↩

  6. "Extortion - Essential Elements and the Broader Reach of RICO". Stimmel Law. https://www.stimmel-law.com/en/articles/extortion-essential-elements-and-broader-reach-rico ↩

  7. Lindgren, James (April 1984). "Unraveling the Paradox of Blackmail". Columbia Law Review. 84 (3): 670–717. doi:10.2307/1122502. JSTOR 1122502. /wiki/Doi_(identifier) ↩

  8. Posner, Richard A. (1992). "Blackmail, Privacy, and Freedom of Contract". University of Pennsylvania Law Review. 141 (5): 1817–1847. doi:10.2307/3312575. JSTOR 3312575. https://chicagounbound.uchicago.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1088&context=law_and_economics ↩

  9. The Scottish Beat Officer's Companion (6th ed.). Jane's Police Review. 29 June 2010. p. 85. ISBN 978-07106-2928-9. 978-07106-2928-9 ↩

  10. Jury Manual (2018 ed.). Parliament House, Edinburgh: Judicial Institute for Scotland. 9 November 2018. p. 46.1. Archived from the original on 30 January 2020. Retrieved 25 January 2019. https://web.archive.org/web/20200130043115/http://www.scotland-judiciary.org.uk/60/0/Judicial-Institute-Publications ↩

  11. Sulkowski, Adam J. "Cyber-Extortion: Duties and Liabilities Related to the Elephant in the Server Room". SSRN Electronic Journal. 2007: 101–144. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228243486 ↩

  12. "Computer Security Ethics and Privacy". Archived from the original on 2011-10-11. Retrieved 2016-06-29. https://web.archive.org/web/20111011203948/http://www.webreference.com/internet/security/ ↩

  13. "Brand.com's Mike Zammuto Discusses Meetup.com Extortion". Dailyglobe.com. 2014-03-05. Archived from the original on 2014-04-12. Retrieved 2014-03-10. https://web.archive.org/web/20140412021812/http://dailyglobe.com/61817/brand-coms-mike-zammuto-discusses-meetup-com-extortion/ ↩

  14. "Alleged Cyber-Extortionist Indicted: Feds Say Anthony Digati Tried To Chill, Defame Business On Internet To Extract $200,000 In Bizarre Social-Networking Plot". Patrickpretty.com. 2010-04-22. Retrieved 2014-03-10. http://www.patrickpretty.com/2010/04/22/alleged-cyber-extortionist-indicted-feds-say-anthony-digati-tried-to-chill-defame-business-on-internet-to-extract-200000-in-bizarre-social-networking-plot/ ↩

  15. Gendar, Alison (2010-03-08). "Anthony Digati arrested for allegedly threatening New York Life with email spam attack". NY Daily News. Archived from the original on 2011-06-29. Retrieved 2014-03-10. https://web.archive.org/web/20110629064915/http://www.nydailynews.com/money/2010/03/08/2010-03-08_anthony_digati_arrested_for_allegedly_threatening_new_york_life_with_email_spam_.html ↩

  16. Woollacott, Emma (2011-02-15). "Police arrest man over Nintendo extortion". TG Daily. Archived from the original on 2017-02-01. Retrieved 2014-03-10. https://web.archive.org/web/20170201131755/http://www.tgdaily.com/business-and-law-features/54123-police-arrest-man-over-nintendo-extortion ↩

  17. Bezos, Jeffrey (2019-01-09). "Jeff Bezos announces divorce from MacKenzie Bezos after 25 years together". The Washington Post. https://www.washingtonpost.com/arts-entertainment/2019/01/09/jeff-bezos-announces-divorce-mackenzie-bezos-after-years-together/ ↩

  18. Bezos, Jeffrey (2019-02-07). "No thank you, Mr. Pecker". Medium. Retrieved 2019-02-08. https://medium.com/@jeffreypbezos/no-thank-you-mr-pecker-146e3922310f ↩

  19. "Psychotherapy centre's database hacked, patient info held ransom". Yle Uutiset. 21 October 2020. Retrieved 2020-10-24. https://yle.fi/uutiset/osasto/news/psychotherapy_centres_database_hacked_patient_info_held_ransom/11605460 ↩

  20. "Extortionist publishes more sensitive data on psychotherapy centres' patients". Yle Uutiset. 22 October 2020. Retrieved 2020-10-24. https://yle.fi/uutiset/osasto/news/extortionist_publishes_more_sensitive_data_on_psychotherapy_centres_patients/11608960 ↩

  21. Sipilä, Jarkko (27 October 2020). "Therapy patients in Finland blackmailed after data breach". CNN. Retrieved 2020-10-27. https://www.cnn.com/2020/10/27/tech/finland-therapy-patients-blackmailed-data-breach-intl/index.html ↩

  22. "Extortionist publishes more sensitive data on psychotherapy centres' patients". Yle Uutiset. 22 October 2020. Retrieved 2020-10-24. https://yle.fi/uutiset/osasto/news/extortionist_publishes_more_sensitive_data_on_psychotherapy_centres_patients/11608960 ↩

  23. "Psychotherapy centre data breach victims receive extortion emails". Yle Uutiset. 24 October 2020. Retrieved 2020-10-24. https://yle.fi/uutiset/osasto/news/psychotherapy_centre_data_breach_victims_receive_extortion_emails/11612230 ↩

  24. "Tietoturva | Terapiapotilaisiin kohdistunut tietomurto on voinut vaarantaa tuhansien ihmisten tietosuojan, kyseessä on täysin "poikkeuksellinen tapahtuma"". Helsingin Sanomat (in Finnish). 2020-10-22. Retrieved 2020-10-24. https://www.hs.fi/kotimaa/art-2000006687766.html ↩

  25. "Kiristäjä julkaisi suomalaisten arkaluontoisia terapiakeskusteluja – vaatii 450 000:ta euroa tai jatkoa seuraa". Ilta-Sanomat (in Finnish). 2020-10-21. Retrieved 2020-10-24. https://www.is.fi/digitoday/tietoturva/art-2000006676604.html ↩

  26. Sipilä, Jarkko (27 October 2020). "Therapy patients in Finland blackmailed after data breach". CNN. Retrieved 2020-10-27. https://www.cnn.com/2020/10/27/tech/finland-therapy-patients-blackmailed-data-breach-intl/index.html ↩