Menu
Home Explore People Places Arts History Plants & Animals Science Life & Culture Technology
On this page
Control dependency

Control dependency is a situation in which a program instruction executes if the previous instruction evaluates in a way that allows its execution.

An instruction B has a control dependency on a preceding instruction A if the outcome of A determines whether B should be executed or not. In the following example, the instruction S 2 {\displaystyle S_{2}} has a control dependency on instruction S 1 {\displaystyle S_{1}} . However, S 3 {\displaystyle S_{3}} does not depend on S 1 {\displaystyle S_{1}} because S 3 {\displaystyle S_{3}} is always executed irrespective of the outcome of S 1 {\displaystyle S_{1}} .

S1. if (a == b) S2. a = a + b S3. b = a + b

Intuitively, there is control dependence between two statements A and B if

  • B could be possibly executed after A
  • The outcome of the execution of A will determine whether B will be executed or not.

A typical example is that there are control dependences between the condition part of an if statement and the statements in its true/false bodies.

A formal definition of control dependence can be presented as follows:

A statement S 2 {\displaystyle S_{2}} is said to be control dependent on another statement S 1 {\displaystyle S_{1}} iff

  • there exists a path P {\displaystyle P} from S 1 {\displaystyle S_{1}} to S 2 {\displaystyle S_{2}} such that every statement S i {\displaystyle S_{i}} ≠ S 1 {\displaystyle S_{1}} within P {\displaystyle P} will be followed by S 2 {\displaystyle S_{2}} in each possible path to the end of the program and
  • S 1 {\displaystyle S_{1}} will not necessarily be followed by S 2 {\displaystyle S_{2}} , i.e. there is an execution path from S 1 {\displaystyle S_{1}} to the end of the program that does not go through S 2 {\displaystyle S_{2}} .

Expressed with the help of (post-)dominance the two conditions are equivalent to

  • S 2 {\displaystyle S_{2}} post-dominates all S i {\displaystyle S_{i}}
  • S 2 {\displaystyle S_{2}} does not post-dominate S 1 {\displaystyle S_{1}}
We don't have any images related to Control dependency yet.
We don't have any YouTube videos related to Control dependency yet.
We don't have any PDF documents related to Control dependency yet.
We don't have any Books related to Control dependency yet.
We don't have any archived web articles related to Control dependency yet.

Construction of control dependences

Control dependences are essentially the dominance frontier in the reverse graph of the control-flow graph (CFG).1 Thus, one way of constructing them, would be to construct the post-dominance frontier of the CFG, and then reversing it to obtain a control dependence graph.

The following is a pseudo-code for constructing the post-dominance frontier:

for each X in a bottom-up traversal of the post-dominator tree do: PostDominanceFrontier(X) ← ∅ for each Y ∈ Predecessors(X) do: if immediatePostDominator(Y) ≠ X: then PostDominanceFrontier(X) ← PostDominanceFrontier(X) ∪ {Y} done for each Z ∈ Children(X) do: for each Y ∈ PostDominanceFrontier(Z) do: if immediatePostDominator(Y) ≠ X: then PostDominanceFrontier(X) ← PostDominanceFrontier(X) ∪ {Y} done done done

Here, Children(X) is the set of nodes in the CFG that are immediately post-dominated by X, and Predecessors(X) are the set of nodes in the CFG that directly precede X in the CFG. Note that node X shall be processed only after all its Children have been processed. Once the post-dominance frontier map is computed, reversing it will result in a map from the nodes in the CFG to the nodes that have a control dependence on them.

See also

References

  1. Cytron, R.; Ferrante, J.; Rosen, B. K.; Wegman, M. N.; Zadeck, F. K. (1989-01-01). "An efficient method of computing static single assignment form". Proceedings of the 16th ACM SIGPLAN-SIGACT symposium on Principles of programming languages - POPL '89. New York, NY, USA: ACM. pp. 25–35. doi:10.1145/75277.75280. ISBN 0897912942. S2CID 8301431. 0897912942