Menu
Home Explore People Places Arts History Plants & Animals Science Life & Culture Technology
On this page
Uniformization (set theory)
Mathematical concept in set theory
Related Image Collections Add Image
We don't have any YouTube videos related to Uniformization (set theory) yet.
We don't have any PDF documents related to Uniformization (set theory) yet.
We don't have any Books related to Uniformization (set theory) yet.
We don't have any archived web articles related to Uniformization (set theory) yet.

In set theory, a branch of mathematics, the axiom of uniformization is a weak form of the axiom of choice. It states that if R {\displaystyle R} is a subset of X × Y {\displaystyle X\times Y} , where X {\displaystyle X} and Y {\displaystyle Y} are Polish spaces, then there is a subset f {\displaystyle f} of R {\displaystyle R} that is a partial function from X {\displaystyle X} to Y {\displaystyle Y} , and whose domain (the set of all x {\displaystyle x} such that f ( x ) {\displaystyle f(x)} exists) equals

{ x ∈ X ∣ ∃ y ∈ Y : ( x , y ) ∈ R } {\displaystyle \{x\in X\mid \exists y\in Y:(x,y)\in R\}\,}

Such a function is called a uniformizing function for R {\displaystyle R} , or a uniformization of R {\displaystyle R} .

To see the relationship with the axiom of choice, observe that R {\displaystyle R} can be thought of as associating, to each element of X {\displaystyle X} , a subset of Y {\displaystyle Y} . A uniformization of R {\displaystyle R} then picks exactly one element from each such subset, whenever the subset is non-empty. Thus, allowing arbitrary sets X and Y (rather than just Polish spaces) would make the axiom of uniformization equivalent to the axiom of choice.

A pointclass Γ {\displaystyle {\boldsymbol {\Gamma }}} is said to have the uniformization property if every relation R {\displaystyle R} in Γ {\displaystyle {\boldsymbol {\Gamma }}} can be uniformized by a partial function in Γ {\displaystyle {\boldsymbol {\Gamma }}} . The uniformization property is implied by the scale property, at least for adequate pointclasses of a certain form.

It follows from ZFC alone that Π 1 1 {\displaystyle {\boldsymbol {\Pi }}_{1}^{1}} and Σ 2 1 {\displaystyle {\boldsymbol {\Sigma }}_{2}^{1}} have the uniformization property. It follows from the existence of sufficient large cardinals that

  • Π 2 n + 1 1 {\displaystyle {\boldsymbol {\Pi }}_{2n+1}^{1}} and Σ 2 n + 2 1 {\displaystyle {\boldsymbol {\Sigma }}_{2n+2}^{1}} have the uniformization property for every natural number n {\displaystyle n} .
  • Therefore, the collection of projective sets has the uniformization property.
  • Every relation in L(R) can be uniformized, but not necessarily by a function in L(R). In fact, L(R) does not have the uniformization property (equivalently, L(R) does not satisfy the axiom of uniformization).
    • (Note: it's trivial that every relation in L(R) can be uniformized in V, assuming V satisfies the axiom of choice. The point is that every such relation can be uniformized in some transitive inner model of V in which the axiom of determinacy holds.)