Menu
Home Explore People Places Arts History Plants & Animals Science Life & Culture Technology
On this page
Rhamnaceae
Family of flowering plants

The Rhamnaceae are a large family of flowering plants, mostly trees, shrubs, and some vines, commonly called the buckthorn family. Rhamnaceae is included in the order Rosales.

The family contains about 55 genera and 950 species. The Rhamnaceae have a worldwide distribution, but are more common in the subtropical and tropical regions. The earliest fossil evidence of Rhamnaceae is from the Late Cretaceous. Fossil flowers have been collected from the Upper Cretaceous of Mexico and the Paleocene of Argentina.

Leaves of family Rhamnaceae members are simple, i.e., the leaf blades are not divided into smaller leaflets. Leaves can be either alternate or opposite. Stipules are present and modified into spines in many genera. In some (e.g. Paliurus spina-christi and Colletia paradoxa) spectacularly so. Colletia stands out by having two axillary buds instead of one, one developing into a thorn, the other one into a shoot.

The flowers are radially symmetrical. There are 5 (sometimes 4) separate sepals and 5 (sometimes 4 or none) separate petals. The petals may be white, yellowish, greenish, pink or blue, and are small and inconspicuous in most genera, though in some (e.g. Ceanothus) the dense clusters of flowers are conspicuous. The 5 or 4 stamens are opposite the petals. The ovary is mostly superior, with 2 or 3 ovules (or one by abortion).

The fruits are mostly berries, fleshy drupes, or nuts. Some are adapted to wind carriage, but most are dispersed by mammals and birds. Chinese jujube is the fruit of the jujube tree (Ziziphus jujuba) and is a major fruit in China.

The American genus Ceanothus, which has several showy ornamental species, has nitrogen-fixing root nodules.

Economic uses of the Rhamnaceae are chiefly as ornamental plants and as the source of many brilliant green and yellow dyes. The wood of Rhamnus was also the most favoured species to make charcoal for use in gunpowder before the development of modern propellants.

Related Image Collections Add Image
Profiles
1 Image
We don't have any YouTube videos related to Rhamnaceae yet.
We don't have any PDF documents related to Rhamnaceae yet.
We don't have any Books related to Rhamnaceae yet.
We don't have any archived web articles related to Rhamnaceae yet.

Genera

Systematics

Modern molecular phylogenetics recommend the following clade-based classification of Rhamnaceae:11

 Elaeagnaceae (outgroup)

Rhamnaceae
Ampeloziziphoids

Ventilago

Bathiorhamnus

Ampelozizyphus

Doerpfeldia

Rhamnoids

Maesopsis

Scutia

Rhamnus

Frangula

Sageretia

Berchemia

Rhamnidium

Rhamnella

Reynosia

Krugiodendron

Karwinskia

Condalia

Ziziphoids

Schistocarpeia

Hovenia

Ziziphus

Paliurus

Gouania

Helinus

Pleuranthodes

Crumenaria

Reissekia

Lasiodiscus

Colubrina

Emmenosperma

Phyliceae

Noltea

Trichocephalus

Nesiota

Phylica

Granitites

Alphitonia

Colletieae

Adolphia

Trevoa

Discaria

Kentrothamnus

Colletia

Retanilla

Ceanothus

Pomaderreae

Siegfriedia

Cryptandra

Stenanthemum

Trymalium

Pomaderris

Spyridium

Fossil record

The fossil record of the family extends back to the Late Cretaceous, with records from Colombia12 and Mexico.13 Remains from the mid-Cretaceous Burmese amber of Myanmar have been suggested to belong to this family by some authors1415, but this has been doubted by others.16 The earliest fossils of modern genera of the family date to the Eocene.17

Wikimedia Commons has media related to Rhamnaceae. Wikispecies has information related to Rhamnaceae.

References

  1. Flowering Plants of the Santa Monica Mountains, Nancy Dale, 2nd Ed. 2000, p. 166 ↩

  2. Walter S. Judd and Richard G. Olmstead (2004). "A survey of tricolpate (eudicot) phylogenetic relationships". American Journal of Botany. 91 (10): 1627–1644. doi:10.3732/ajb.91.10.1627. PMID 21652313. https://doi.org/10.3732%2Fajb.91.10.1627 ↩

  3. Christenhusz MJ, Byng JW (2016). "The number of known plants species in the world and its annual increase". Phytotaxa. 261 (3): 201–217. doi:10.11646/phytotaxa.261.3.1. http://biotaxa.org/Phytotaxa/article/download/phytotaxa.261.3.1/20598 ↩

  4. Jud NA, Gandolfo MA, Iglesias A, Wilf P (2017-05-10). "Flowering after disaster: Early Danian buckthorn (Rhamnaceae) flowers and leaves from Patagonia". PLOS ONE. 12 (5): e0176164. Bibcode:2017PLoSO..1276164J. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0176164. ISSN 1932-6203. PMC 5425202. PMID 28489895. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5425202 ↩

  5. Flowering Plants of the Santa Monica Mountains, Nancy Dale, 2nd Ed. 2000, p. 166 ↩

  6. Flowering Plants of the Santa Monica Mountains, Nancy Dale, 2nd Ed. 2000, p. 166 ↩

  7. Kummerow J, Alexander JV, Neel JW, Fishbeck K (January 1978). "Symbiotic Nitrogen Fixation in Ceanothus Roots". American Journal of Botany. 65 (1): 63–69. doi:10.1002/j.1537-2197.1978.tb10836.x. JSTOR 2442555. /wiki/Doi_(identifier) ↩

  8. Hauenschild F, Matuszak S, Muellner-Riehl AN, Favre A (2016). "Phylogenetic relationships within the cosmopolitan buckthorn family (Rhamnaceae) support the resurrection of Sarcomphalus and the description of Pseudoziziphus gen. nov". Taxon. 65 (1): 47–64. doi:10.12705/651.4. JSTOR taxon.65.1.47. /wiki/Doi_(identifier) ↩

  9. "Granitites". FloraBase. Western Australian Government Department of Biodiversity, Conservation and Attractions. https://florabase.dpaw.wa.gov.au/browse/profile/21733 ↩

  10. "GRIN Genera of Rhamnaceae". Germplasm Resources Information Network. United. Archived from the original on 2015-09-24. Retrieved 2011-01-29. https://web.archive.org/web/20150924061906/http://www.ars-grin.gov/cgi-bin/npgs/html/gnlist.pl?953 ↩

  11. Sun M, Naeem R, Su JX, Cao ZY, Burleigh JG, Soltis PS, Soltis DE, Chen ZD (2016). "Phylogeny of the Rosidae: A dense taxon sampling analysis". Journal of Systematics and Evolution. 54 (4): 363–391. doi:10.1111/jse.12211. https://doi.org/10.1111%2Fjse.12211 ↩

  12. Correa E, Jaramillo C, Manchester S, Gutierrez M (January 2010). "A fruit and leaves of Rhamnaceous affinities from the late Cretaceous (Maastrichtian) of Colombia". American Journal of Botany. 97 (1): 71–79. doi:10.3732/ajb.0900093. ISSN 0002-9122. PMID 21622368. https://bsapubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.3732/ajb.0900093 ↩

  13. Calvillo-Canadell L, Cevallos-Ferriz SR (October 2007). "Reproductive structures of Rhamnaceae from the Cerro del Pueblo (Late Cretaceous, Coahuila) and Coatzingo (Oligocene, Puebla) Formations, Mexico". American Journal of Botany. 94 (10): 1658–1669. doi:10.3732/ajb.94.10.1658. ISSN 0002-9122. PMID 21636362. https://bsapubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.3732/ajb.94.10.1658 ↩

  14. Shi C, Wang S, Cai Hh, Zhang Hr, Long Xx, Tihelka E, Song Wc, Feng Q, Jiang Rx, Cai Cy, Lombard N (2022-01-31). "Fire-prone Rhamnaceae with South African affinities in Cretaceous Myanmar amber". Nature Plants. 8 (2): 125–135. doi:10.1038/s41477-021-01091-w. ISSN 2055-0278. PMID 35102275. S2CID 246443363. https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41477-021-01091-w ↩

  15. Oskolski AA, Morris BB, Severova EE, Sokoloff DD (2024). "Flowers from Myanmar amber confirm the Cretaceous age of Rhamnaceae but not of the extant genus Phylica". Nature Plants. 10 (2): 219–222. Bibcode:2024NatPl..10..219O. doi:10.1038/s41477-023-01591-x. PMID 38278949. S2CID 267267981. /wiki/Bibcode_(identifier) ↩

  16. Beurel S, Bachelier JB, Schmidt AR, Sadowski EM (2024). "Novel three-dimensional reconstructions of presumed Phylica (Rhamnaceae) from Cretaceous amber suggest Lauralean affinities". Nature Plants. 10 (2): 223–227. Bibcode:2024NatPl..10..223B. doi:10.1038/s41477-023-01592-w. PMID 38278948. S2CID 267267851. /wiki/Bibcode_(identifier) ↩

  17. Jud NA, Gandolfo MA, Iglesias A, Wilf P (2017-05-10). Wong WO (ed.). "Flowering after disaster: Early Danian buckthorn (Rhamnaceae) flowers and leaves from Patagonia". PLOS ONE. 12 (5): e0176164. Bibcode:2017PLoSO..1276164J. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0176164. ISSN 1932-6203. PMC 5425202. PMID 28489895. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5425202 ↩