In probability theory, to postselect is to condition a probability space upon the occurrence of a given event. In symbols, once we postselect for an event E {\displaystyle E} , the probability of some other event F {\displaystyle F} changes from Pr [ F ] {\textstyle \operatorname {Pr} [F]} to the conditional probability Pr [ F | E ] {\displaystyle \operatorname {Pr} [F\,|\,E]} .
For a discrete probability space, Pr [ F | E ] = Pr [ F ∩ E ] Pr [ E ] {\textstyle \operatorname {Pr} [F\,|\,E]={\frac {\operatorname {Pr} [F\,\cap \,E]}{\operatorname {Pr} [E]}}} , and thus we require that Pr [ E ] {\textstyle \operatorname {Pr} [E]} be strictly positive in order for the postselection to be well-defined.
See also PostBQP, a complexity class defined with postselection. Using postselection it seems quantum Turing machines are much more powerful: Scott Aaronson proved PostBQP is equal to PP.
Some quantum experiments use post-selection after the experiment as a replacement for communication during the experiment, by post-selecting the communicated value into a constant.
References
Aaronson, Scott (2005). "Quantum computing, postselection, and probabilistic polynomial-time". Proceedings of the Royal Society A. 461 (2063): 3473–3482. arXiv:quant-ph/0412187. Bibcode:2005RSPSA.461.3473A. doi:10.1098/rspa.2005.1546. /wiki/Proceedings_of_the_Royal_Society_A ↩
Aaronson, Scott (2004-01-11). "Complexity Class of the Week: PP". Computational Complexity Weblog. Retrieved 2008-05-02. http://weblog.fortnow.com/2004/01/complexity-class-of-week-pp-by-guest.html ↩
Hensen; et al. (2015). "Loophole-free Bell inequality violation using electron spins separated by 1.3 kilometres". Nature. 526 (7575): 682–686. arXiv:1508.05949. Bibcode:2015Natur.526..682H. doi:10.1038/nature15759. PMID 26503041. /wiki/ArXiv_(identifier) ↩