Objective-collapse theory

Objective-collapse theories, also known spontaneous collapse models or dynamical reduction models, are proposed solutions to the <a href="/facts/Measurement_problem/6Ux183hb">measurement problem in quantum mechanics</a>. As with other <a href="/facts/Interpretations_of_quantum_mechanics/WEjlzVPl">interpretations of quantum mechanics</a>, they are possible explanations of why and how quantum measurements always give definite outcomes, not a superposition of them as predicted by the <a href="/facts/Schr%C3%B6dinger_equation/3csgSIWF">Schrödinger equation</a>, and more generally how the classical world emerges from quantum theory. The fundamental idea is that the unitary evolution of the <a href="/facts/Wave_function/KgM5ykjY">wave function</a> describing the state of a <a href="/facts/Quantum_system/BRc3Mzgr">quantum system</a> is approximate. It works well for microscopic systems, but progressively loses its validity when the mass / complexity of the system increases.
In collapse theories, the Schrödinger equation is supplemented with additional nonlinear and stochastic terms (spontaneous collapses) which localize the wave function in space. The resulting dynamics is such that for microscopic isolated systems, the new terms have a negligible effect; therefore, the usual quantum properties are recovered, apart from very tiny deviations. Such deviations can potentially be detected in dedicated experiments, and efforts are increasing worldwide towards testing them.
An inbuilt amplification mechanism makes sure that for macroscopic systems consisting of many particles, the collapse becomes stronger than the quantum dynamics. Then their wave function is always well-localized in space, so well-localized that it behaves, for all practical purposes, like a point moving in space according to Newton's laws.
In this sense, collapse models provide a unified description of microscopic and macroscopic systems, avoiding the conceptual problems associated to measurements in quantum theory.
The most well-known examples of such theories are:

<ul><li><a href="/facts/Ghirardi%E2%80%93Rimini%E2%80%93Weber_theory/bJyY1VrA">Ghirardi–Rimini–Weber (GRW) model</a></li>
<li><a href="/facts/Continuous_spontaneous_localization_model/6fL9o8oA">Continuous spontaneous localization (CSL) model</a></li>
<li><a href="/facts/Di%C3%B3si%E2%80%93Penrose_model/lWyyd8Nq">Diósi–Penrose (DP) model</a></li></ul>
Collapse theories stand in opposition to <a href="/facts/Many-worlds_interpretation/JSPo7n7r">many-worlds interpretation theories</a>, in that they hold that a process of <a href="/facts/Wavefunction_collapse/f7KvbBHK">wave function collapse</a> curtails the branching of the <a href="/facts/Wave_function/KgM5ykjY">wave function</a> and removes unobserved behaviour.

Objective-collapse theory open-in-new

Objective-collapse theory