For example, consider the electromagnetic wave equation:
∇ 2 E − 1 c 2 ∂ 2 E ∂ t 2 = 0 , {\displaystyle \nabla ^{2}E-{\frac {1}{c^{2}}}{\frac {\partial ^{2}E}{\partial t^{2}}}=0\,,}
where c = 1 μ 0 ε 0 . {\displaystyle c={\frac {1}{\sqrt {\mu _{0}\varepsilon _{0}}}}~.}
If k0 and ω0 are the wave number and angular frequency of the (characteristic) carrier wave for the signal E(r,t), the following representation is useful:
E ( r , t ) = Re [ E 0 ( r , t ) e i ( k 0 ⋅ r − ω 0 t ) ] , {\displaystyle E(\mathbf {r} ,t)=\operatorname {\operatorname {Re} } \left[E_{0}(\mathbf {r} ,t)\,e^{i(\mathbf {k} _{0}\cdot \mathbf {r} -\omega _{0}t)}\right],}
where Re [ ⋅ ] {\displaystyle \operatorname {Re} [\,\cdot \,]} denotes the real part of the quantity between brackets, and i 2 ≡ − 1. {\displaystyle i^{2}\equiv -1.}
In the slowly varying envelope approximation (SVEA) it is assumed that the complex amplitude E0(r, t) only varies slowly with r and t. This inherently implies that E(r, t) represents waves propagating forward, predominantly in the k0 direction. As a result of the slow variation of E0(r, t), when taking derivatives, the highest-order derivatives may be neglected:2
Consequently, the wave equation is approximated in the SVEA as:
2 i k 0 ⋅ ∇ E 0 + 2 i ω 0 c 2 ∂ E 0 ∂ t − ( k 0 2 − ω 0 2 c 2 ) E 0 = 0 . {\displaystyle 2i\mathbf {k} _{0}\cdot \nabla E_{0}+{\frac {2i\omega _{0}}{c^{2}}}{\frac {\partial E_{0}}{\partial t}}-\left(k_{0}^{2}-{\frac {\omega _{0}^{2}}{c^{2}}}\right)E_{0}=0~.}
It is convenient to choose k0 and ω0 such that they satisfy the dispersion relation:
k 0 2 − ω 0 2 c 2 = 0 . {\displaystyle k_{0}^{2}-{\frac {\omega _{0}^{2}}{c^{2}}}=0~.}
This gives the following approximation to the wave equation, as a result of the slowly varying envelope approximation:
k 0 ⋅ ∇ E 0 + ω 0 c 2 ∂ E 0 ∂ t = 0 . {\displaystyle \mathbf {k} _{0}\cdot \nabla E_{0}+{\frac {\omega _{0}}{c^{2}}}\,{\frac {\partial E_{0}}{\partial t}}=0~.}
This is a hyperbolic partial differential equation, like the original wave equation, but now of first-order instead of second-order. It is valid for coherent forward-propagating waves in directions near the k0-direction. The space and time scales over which E0 varies are generally much longer than the spatial wavelength and temporal period of the carrier wave. A numerical solution of the envelope equation thus can use much larger space and time steps, resulting in significantly less computational effort.
Assume wave propagation is dominantly in the z-direction, and k0 is taken in this direction. The SVEA is only applied to the second-order spatial derivatives in the z-direction and time. If Δ ⊥ ≡ ∂ 2 / ∂ x 2 + ∂ 2 / ∂ y 2 {\displaystyle \Delta _{\perp }\equiv \partial ^{2}/\partial x^{2}+\partial ^{2}/\partial y^{2}} is the Laplace operator in the x×y plane, the result is:3
k 0 ∂ E 0 ∂ z + ω 0 c 2 ∂ E 0 ∂ t − 1 2 i Δ ⊥ E 0 = 0 . {\displaystyle k_{0}{\frac {\partial E_{0}}{\partial z}}+{\frac {\omega _{0}}{c^{2}}}{\frac {\partial E_{0}}{\partial t}}-{\frac {1}{2}}\,i\,\Delta _{\perp }E_{0}=0~.}
This is a parabolic partial differential equation. This equation has enhanced validity as compared to the full SVEA: It represents waves propagating in directions significantly different from the z-direction.
In the one-dimensional case, another sufficient condition for the SVEA validity is
where ℓ g {\displaystyle \ell _{\mathsf {g}}} is the length over which the radiation pulse is amplified, ℓ p {\displaystyle \ell _{\mathsf {p}}} is the pulse width and v {\displaystyle v} is the group velocity of the radiating system.4
These conditions are much less restrictive in the relativistic limit where v c {\displaystyle {\frac {v}{c}}} is close to 1, as in a free-electron laser, compared to the usual conditions required for the SVEA validity.
Arecchi, F.; Bonifacio, R. (1965). "Theory of optical maser amplifiers". IEEE Journal of Quantum Electronics. 1 (4): 169–178. Bibcode:1965IJQE....1..169A. doi:10.1109/JQE.1965.1072212. /wiki/IEEE_Journal_of_Quantum_Electronics ↩
Butcher, Paul N.; Cotter, David (1991). The Elements of Nonlinear Optics (reprint ed.). Cambridge University Press. p. 216. ISBN 0-521-42424-0. 0-521-42424-0 ↩
Svelto, Orazio (1974). "Self-focussing, self-trapping, and self-phase modulation of laser beams". In Wolf, Emil (ed.). Progress in Optics. Vol. 12. North Holland. pp. 23–25. ISBN 0-444-10571-9. 0-444-10571-9 ↩
Bonifacio, R.; Caloi, R.M.; Maroli, C. (1993). "The slowly varying envelope approximation revisited". Optics Communications. 101 (3–4): 185–187. Bibcode:1993OptCo.101..185B. doi:10.1016/0030-4018(93)90363-A. /wiki/Optics_Communications ↩