Fourier-transform spectroscopy

<h2 id="conceptual-introduction">Conceptual introduction</h2>
<h3>Measuring an emission spectrum</h3>

<p>One of the most basic tasks in <a href="/facts/Spectroscopy/mj71FuNK">spectroscopy</a> is to characterize the <a href="/facts/Spectrum/wPUjkpqI">spectrum</a> of a light source: how much light is emitted at each different wavelength. The most straightforward way to measure a spectrum is to pass the light through a <a href="/facts/Monochromator/vagojlBb">monochromator</a>, an instrument that blocks all of the light <i>except</i> the light at a certain wavelength (the un-blocked wavelength is set by a knob on the monochromator). Then the intensity of this remaining (single-wavelength) light is measured. The measured intensity directly indicates how much light is emitted at that wavelength. By varying the monochromator's wavelength setting, the full spectrum can be measured. This simple scheme in fact describes how <i>some</i> spectrometers work.
</p><p>Fourier-transform spectroscopy is a less intuitive way to get the same information. Rather than allowing only one wavelength at a time to pass through to the detector, this technique lets through a beam containing many different wavelengths of light at once, and measures the <i>total</i> beam intensity. Next, the beam is modified to contain a <i>different</i> combination of wavelengths, giving a second data point. This process is repeated many times. Afterwards, a computer takes all this data and works backwards to infer how much light there is at each wavelength.
</p><p>To be more specific, between the light source and the detector, there is a certain configuration of mirrors that allows some wavelengths to pass through but blocks others (due to <a href="/facts/Wave_interference/lI5f78I4">wave interference</a>). The beam is modified for each new data point by moving one of the mirrors; this changes the set of wavelengths that can pass through.
</p><p>As mentioned, computer processing is required to turn the raw data (light intensity for each mirror position) into the desired result (light intensity for each wavelength). The processing required turns out to be a common algorithm called the <a href="/facts/Fourier_transform/XXhKJtc8">Fourier transform</a> (hence the name, "Fourier-transform spectroscopy"). The raw data is sometimes called an "interferogram". Because of the existing computer equipment requirements, and the ability of light to analyze very small amounts of substance, it is often beneficial to automate many aspects of the sample preparation. The sample can be better preserved and the results are much easier to replicate. Both of these benefits are important, for instance, in testing situations that may later involve legal action, such as those involving drug specimens.<a class="footnote-ref" id="fnref:2" href="#fn:2"><sup>2</sup></a>
</p>
<h3>Measuring an absorption spectrum</h3>

<p>The method of Fourier-transform spectroscopy can also be used for <a href="/facts/Absorption_spectroscopy/GH7RC14D">absorption spectroscopy</a>. The primary example is "<a href="/facts/Fourier-transform_infrared_spectroscopy/G9UscTuA">FTIR Spectroscopy</a>", a common technique in chemistry.
</p><p>In general, the goal of absorption spectroscopy is to measure how well a sample absorbs or transmits light at each different wavelength. Although absorption spectroscopy and emission spectroscopy are different in principle, they are closely related in practice; any technique for emission spectroscopy can also be used for absorption spectroscopy. First, the emission spectrum of a broadband lamp is measured (this is called the "background spectrum"). Second, the emission spectrum of the same lamp <i>shining through the sample</i> is measured (this is called the "sample spectrum"). The sample will absorb some of the light, causing the spectra to be different. The ratio of the "sample spectrum" to the "background spectrum" is directly related to the sample's absorption spectrum.
</p><p>Accordingly, the technique of "Fourier-transform spectroscopy" can be used both for measuring emission spectra (for example, the emission spectrum of a star), <i>and</i> absorption spectra (for example, the absorption spectrum of a liquid).
</p>
<h2 id="continuous-wave-michelsonor-fourier-transformspectrograph">Continuous-wave <i>Michelson</i> or <i>Fourier-transform</i> spectrograph</h2>

<p>The Michelson spectrograph is similar to the instrument used in the <a href="/facts/Michelson%25E2%2580%2593Morley_experiment/yyrNEgA4">Michelson–Morley experiment</a>. Light from the source is split into two beams by a half-silvered mirror, one is reflected off a fixed mirror and one off a movable mirror, which introduces a time delay—the Fourier-transform spectrometer is just a <a href="/facts/Michelson_interferometer/wCIPH6gL">Michelson interferometer</a> with a movable mirror. The beams interfere, allowing the temporal <a href="/facts/Coherence_(physics)/NF1Rgdoa">coherence</a> of the light to be measured at each different time delay setting, effectively converting the time domain into a spatial coordinate. By making measurements of the signal at many discrete positions of the movable mirror, the spectrum can be reconstructed using a Fourier transform of the temporal <a href="/facts/Coherence_(physics)/NF1Rgdoa">coherence</a> of the light. Michelson spectrographs are capable of very high spectral resolution observations of very bright sources.
The Michelson or Fourier-transform spectrograph was popular for infra-red applications at a time when infra-red astronomy only had single-pixel detectors. Imaging Michelson spectrometers are a possibility, but in general have been supplanted by imaging <a href="/facts/Fabry%25E2%2580%2593P%25C3%25A9rot/n949LwQD">Fabry–Pérot</a> instruments, which are easier to construct.
</p>
<h3>Extracting the spectrum</h3>
<p>The intensity as a function of the path length difference (also denoted as retardation) in the interferometer 
  
    
      
        p
      
    
    {\displaystyle p}
  
 and <a href="/facts/Wavenumber/cLaLAeW5">wavenumber</a> 
  
    
      
        
          
            
              ν
              ~
            
          
        
        =
        1
        
          /
        
        λ
      
    
    {\displaystyle {\tilde {\nu }}=1/\lambda }
  
 is <a class="footnote-ref" id="fnref:3" href="#fn:3"><sup>3</sup></a>
</p>

I
        (
        p
        ,
        
          
            
              ν
              ~
            
          
        
        )
        =
        I
        (
        
          
            
              ν
              ~
            
          
        
        )
        [
        1
        +
        cos
        ⁡
        
          (
          
            2
            π
            
              
                
                  ν
                  ~
                
              
            
            p
          
          )
        
        ]
        ,
      
    
    {\displaystyle I(p,{\tilde {\nu }})=I({\tilde {\nu }})[1+\cos \left(2\pi {\tilde {\nu }}p\right)],}

<p>where 
  
    
      
        I
        (
        
          
            
              ν
              ~
            
          
        
        )
      
    
    {\displaystyle I({\tilde {\nu }})}
  
 is the spectrum to be determined.  Note that it is not necessary for 
  
    
      
        I
        (
        
          
            
              ν
              ~
            
          
        
        )
      
    
    {\displaystyle I({\tilde {\nu }})}
  
 to be modulated by the sample before the interferometer.  In fact, most <a href="/facts/Fourier-transform_infrared_spectroscopy/G9UscTuA">FTIR spectrometers</a> place the sample after the interferometer in the optical path.  The total intensity at the detector is
</p>

I
                (
                p
                )
              
              
                
                =
                
                  ∫
                  
                    0
                  
                  
                    ∞
                  
                
                I
                (
                p
                ,
                
                  
                    
                      ν
                      ~
                    
                  
                
                )
                d
                
                  
                    
                      ν
                      ~
                    
                  
                
              
            
            
              
              
                
                =
                
                  ∫
                  
                    0
                  
                  
                    ∞
                  
                
                I
                (
                
                  
                    
                      ν
                      ~
                    
                  
                
                )
                [
                1
                +
                cos
                ⁡
                (
                2
                π
                
                  
                    
                      ν
                      ~
                    
                  
                
                p
                )
                ]
                
                d
                
                  
                    
                      ν
                      ~
                    
                  
                
                .
              
            
          
        
      
    
    {\displaystyle {\begin{aligned}I(p)&=\int _{0}^{\infty }I(p,{\tilde {\nu }})d{\tilde {\nu }}\\&=\int _{0}^{\infty }I({\tilde {\nu }})[1+\cos(2\pi {\tilde {\nu }}p)]\,d{\tilde {\nu }}.\end{aligned}}}

<p>This is just a <a href="/facts/Sine_and_cosine_transforms/5zkyJEdY">Fourier cosine transform</a>.  The inverse gives us our desired result in terms of the measured quantity 
  
    
      
        I
        (
        p
        )
      
    
    {\displaystyle I(p)}
  
:
</p>

I
        (
        
          
            
              ν
              ~
            
          
        
        )
        =
        4
        
          ∫
          
            0
          
          
            ∞
          
        
        
          [
          
            I
            (
            p
            )
            −
            
              
                1
                2
              
            
            I
            (
            p
            =
            0
            )
          
          ]
        
        cos
        ⁡
        (
        2
        π
        
          
            
              ν
              ~
            
          
        
        p
        )
        
        d
        p
        .
      
    
    {\displaystyle I({\tilde {\nu }})=4\int _{0}^{\infty }\left[I(p)-{\frac {1}{2}}I(p=0)\right]\cos(2\pi {\tilde {\nu }}p)\,dp.}

<h2 id="pulsed-fourier-transform-spectrometer">Pulsed Fourier-transform spectrometer</h2>
<p>A pulsed Fourier-transform spectrometer does not employ transmittance techniques.  In the most general description of pulsed FT spectrometry, a sample is exposed to an energizing event which causes a periodic response.  The frequency of the periodic response, as governed by the field conditions in the spectrometer, is indicative of the measured properties of the analyte.
</p>
<h3>Examples of pulsed Fourier-transform spectrometry</h3>
<p>In magnetic spectroscopy (<a href="/facts/Electron_paramagnetic_resonance/TDHV8c9e">EPR</a>, <a href="/facts/Nuclear_magnetic_resonance/pGYAn9Bz">NMR</a>), a microwave pulse (EPR) or a radio frequency pulse (NMR) in a strong ambient magnetic field is used as the energizing event.  This turns the magnetic particles at an angle to the ambient field, resulting in gyration.  The gyrating spins then induce a periodic current in a detector coil.  Each spin exhibits a characteristic frequency of gyration (relative to the field strength) which reveals information about the analyte.
</p><p>In <a href="/facts/Fourier-transform_mass_spectrometry/3HLmwSas">Fourier-transform mass spectrometry</a>, the energizing event is the injection of the charged sample into the strong electromagnetic field of a cyclotron.  These particles travel in circles, inducing a current in a fixed coil on one point in their circle.  Each traveling particle exhibits a characteristic cyclotron frequency-field ratio revealing the masses in the sample.
</p>
<h3>Free induction decay</h3>
<p>Pulsed FT spectrometry gives the advantage of requiring a single, time-dependent measurement which can easily deconvolute a set of similar but distinct signals.  The resulting composite signal, is called a <i>free induction decay,</i> because typically the signal will decay due to inhomogeneities in sample frequency, or simply unrecoverable loss of signal due to entropic loss of the property being measured.
</p>
<h3>Nanoscale spectroscopy with pulsed sources</h3>
<p>Pulsed sources allow for the utilization of Fourier-transform spectroscopy principles in <a href="/facts/Near-field_scanning_optical_microscope/D844weAD">scanning near-field optical microscopy</a> techniques. Particularly in <a href="/facts/Nano-FTIR/GzCc3HWL">nano-FTIR</a>, where the scattering from a sharp probe-tip is used to perform spectroscopy of samples with nanoscale spatial resolution, a high-power illumination from pulsed infrared lasers makes up for a relatively small <a href="/facts/Scattering_cross_section/lo014h2D">scattering efficiency</a> (often < 1%) of the probe.<a class="footnote-ref" id="fnref:4" href="#fn:4"><sup>4</sup></a>
</p>
<h2 id="stationary-forms-of-fourier-transform-spectrometers">Stationary forms of Fourier-transform spectrometers</h2>
<p>In addition to the scanning forms of Fourier-transform spectrometers, there are a number of stationary or self-scanned forms.<a class="footnote-ref" id="fnref:5" href="#fn:5"><sup>5</sup></a> While the analysis of the interferometric output is similar to that of the typical scanning interferometer, significant differences apply, as shown in the published analyses. Some stationary forms retain the Fellgett multiplex advantage, and their use in the spectral region where detector noise limits apply is similar to the scanning forms of the FTS. In the photon-noise limited region, the application of stationary interferometers is dictated by specific consideration for the spectral region and the application.
</p>
<h2 id="fellgett-advantage">Fellgett advantage</h2>
<p class="note">Main article: <a href="/facts/Fellgett%2527s_advantage/V0hwgAvd">Fellgett's advantage</a></p>
<p>One of the most important advantages of Fourier-transform spectroscopy was shown by P. B. Fellgett, an early advocate of the method. The Fellgett advantage, also known as the multiplex principle, states that when obtaining a spectrum when measurement noise is dominated by detector noise (which is independent of the power of radiation incident on the detector), a multiplex spectrometer such as a Fourier-transform spectrometer will produce a relative improvement in signal-to-noise ratio, compared to an equivalent scanning <a href="/facts/Monochromator/vagojlBb">monochromator</a>, of the order of the square root of <i>m</i>, where <i>m</i> is the number of sample points comprising the spectrum. However, if the detector is <a href="/facts/Shot-noise/Vblzt9ux">shot-noise</a> dominated, the noise will be proportional to the square root of the power, thus for a broad boxcar spectrum (continuous broadband source), the noise is proportional to the square root of <i>m</i>, thus precisely offset the Fellgett's advantage.  For line emission sources the situation is even worse and there is a distinct `multiplex disadvantage' as the shot noise from a strong emission component will overwhelm the fainter components of the spectrum. Shot noise is the main reason Fourier-transform spectrometry was never popular for ultraviolet (UV) and visible spectra.
</p>
<h2 id="see-also">See also</h2>

<ul><li><a href="/facts/Applied_spectroscopy/393n97Dd">Applied spectroscopy</a></li>
<li><a href="/facts/Forensic_chemistry/RnxNlRXM">Forensic chemistry</a></li>
<li><a href="/facts/Forensic_polymer_engineering/upF4CAAT">Forensic polymer engineering</a></li>
<li><a href="/facts/Nuclear_magnetic_resonance/pGYAn9Bz">Nuclear magnetic resonance</a></li>
<li><a href="/facts/Time_stretch_dispersive_Fourier_transform/dWA9vr58">Time stretch dispersive Fourier transform</a></li>
<li><a href="/facts/Infrared_spectroscopy/u1Hzx617">Infrared spectroscopy</a></li>
<li><a href="/facts/Infrared_spectroscopy_of_metal_carbonyls/KzJBcMzU">Infrared spectroscopy of metal carbonyls</a></li>
<li><a href="/facts/Nano-FTIR/GzCc3HWL">nano-FTIR</a></li>
<li><a href="/facts/Fellgett%2527s_advantage/V0hwgAvd">Fellgett's advantage</a></li></ul>

<h2 id="external-links">External links</h2>
<ul><li><a href="http://scienceworld.wolfram.com/physics/FourierTransformSpectrometer.html">Description of how a Fourier transform spectrometer works</a></li>
<li><a href="https://web.archive.org/web/20120204045036/http://www.astro.livjm.ac.uk/courses/phys362/notes/">The Michelson or Fourier transform spectrograph</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.ijvs.com/volume5/edition5/section1.html#Feature">Internet Journal of Vibrational Spectroscopy – How FTIR works</a></li>
<li><a href="https://web.archive.org/web/20070520020645/http://www.osa.org/meetings/topicalmeetings/fts/default.aspx">Fourier Transform Spectroscopy Topical Meeting and Tabletop Exhibit</a></li></ul>

<h2 id="references">References</h2>

<ol>
<li id="fn:1"><p>Antoine Abragam. 1968. Principles of Nuclear Magnetic Resonance, Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK. <a href="#fnref:1" class="footnote-back-ref">↩</a></p></li>
<li id="fn:2"><p>Semiautomated depositor for infrared microspectrometry
http://www.opticsinfobase.org/viewmedia.cfm?uri=as-57-9-1078&seq=0 <a href="http://www.opticsinfobase.org/viewmedia.cfm?uri=as-57-9-1078&seq=0" target="_blank">http://www.opticsinfobase.org/viewmedia.cfm?uri=as-57-9-1078&seq=0</a> <a href="#fnref:2" class="footnote-back-ref">↩</a></p></li>
<li id="fn:3"><p>Peter Atkins, Julio De Paula. 2006. Physical Chemistry, 8th ed. Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK. <a href="#fnref:3" class="footnote-back-ref">↩</a></p></li>
<li id="fn:4"><p>Hegenbarth, R; Steinmann, A; Mastel, S; Amarie, S; Huber, A J; Hillenbrand, R; Sarkisov, S Y; Giessen, H (2014). "High-power femtosecond mid-IR sources for s-SNOM applications". Journal of Optics. 16 (9): 094003. Bibcode:2014JOpt...16i4003H. doi:10.1088/2040-8978/16/9/094003. S2CID 49192831. <a href="http://stacks.iop.org/2040-8986/16/i=9/a=094003?key=crossref.3eb2b21f107d58830fc324d0ec18d34e" target="_blank">http://stacks.iop.org/2040-8986/16/i=9/a=094003?key=crossref.3eb2b21f107d58830fc324d0ec18d34e</a> <a href="#fnref:4" class="footnote-back-ref">↩</a></p></li>
<li id="fn:5"><p>William H. Smith U.S. patent 4,976,542 Digital Array Scanned Interferometer, issued Dec. 11, 1990 <a href="https://patents.google.com/patent/US4976542" target="_blank">https://patents.google.com/patent/US4976542</a> <a href="#fnref:5" class="footnote-back-ref">↩</a></p></li>
</ol>

Fourier-transform spectroscopy open-in-new

Fourier-transform spectroscopy