Flavius Julius Constantius1 was born in 317 at Sirmium, Pannonia, now Serbia. He was the third son of Constantine the Great, and second by his second wife Fausta, the daughter of Maximian. Constantius was made caesar by his father on 8 November 324.2 In 336, religious unrest in Armenia and tense relations between Constantine and king Shapur II caused war to break out between Rome and Sassanid Persia.3 Though he made initial preparations for the war, Constantine fell ill and sent Constantius east to take command of the eastern frontier.45 Before Constantius arrived, the Persian general Narses, who was possibly the king's brother, overran Mesopotamia and captured Amida. Constantius promptly attacked Narses, and after suffering minor setbacks defeated and killed Narses at the Battle of Narasara.6 Constantius captured Amida and initiated a major refortification of the city, enhancing the city's circuit walls and constructing large towers. He also built a new stronghold in the hinterland nearby, naming it Antinopolis.7
In early 337, Constantius hurried to Constantinople after receiving news that his father was near death. After Constantine died, Constantius buried him with lavish ceremony in the Church of the Holy Apostles.8 Soon after his father's death, the army massacred his relatives descended from the marriage of his paternal grandfather Constantius Chlorus to Flavia Maximiana Theodora, though the details are unclear.910 Two of Constantius's uncles (Julius Constantius and Flavius Dalmatius) and seven of his cousins were killed,11 including Hannibalianus and Dalmatius, rulers of Pontus and Moesia respectively, leaving Constantius, his two brothers Constantine II and Constans, and three cousins Gallus, Julian and Nepotianus as the only surviving male relatives of Constantine the Great. While the “official version” was that Constantius's relatives were merely the victims of a mutinous army,121314 Ammianus Marcellinus, Zosimus, Libanius, Athanasius and Julian all blamed Constantius for the event.1516 Burgess considered the latter version to be “consistent with all the evidence”, pointing to multiple factors that he believed lined up with the massacre being a planned attack rather than a spontaneous mutiny - the lack of high-profile punishments as a response, the sparing of all women, the attempted damnatio memoriae on the deceased, and the exile of the survivors Gallus and Julian.1718
Soon after, Constantius met his brothers in Pannonia at Sirmium to formalize the partition of the empire.19 Constantius received the eastern provinces, including Constantinople, Thrace, Asia Minor, Syria, Egypt, and Cyrenaica; Constantine received Britannia, Gaul, Hispania, and Mauretania; and Constans, initially under the supervision of Constantine II, received Italy, Africa, Illyricum, Pannonia, Macedonia, and Achaea.20
Constantius then hurried east to Antioch to resume the war with Persia.2122 While Constantius was away from the eastern frontier in early 337, King Shapur II assembled a large army, which included war elephants, and launched an attack on Roman territory, laying waste to Mesopotamia and putting the city of Nisibis under siege.23 Despite initial success, Shapur lifted his siege after his army missed an opportunity to exploit a collapsed wall.24 When Constantius learned of Shapur's withdrawal from Roman territory, he prepared his army for a counter-attack.
Constantius repeatedly defended the eastern border against invasions by the Sassanid Empire under Shapur. These conflicts were mainly limited to Sassanid sieges of the major fortresses of Roman Mesopotamia, including Nisibis (Nusaybin), Singara, and Amida (Diyarbakir).25 Although Shapur seems to have been victorious in most of these confrontations, the Sassanids were able to achieve little.2627 However, the Romans won a decisive victory at the Battle of Narasara, killing Shapur's brother, Narses.28 Ultimately, Constantius was able to push back the invasion, and Shapur failed to make any significant gains.29
Meanwhile, Constantine II desired to retain control of Constans's realm, leading the brothers into open conflict. Constantine was killed in 340 near Aquileia during an ambush.303132 As a result, Constans took control of his deceased brother's realms and became sole ruler of the Western two-thirds of the empire. This division lasted until January 350, when Constans was assassinated by forces loyal to the usurper Magnentius.333435
Main article: Roman civil war of 350–353
Constantius was determined to march west to fight the usurper.36 However, feeling that the east still required some sort of imperial presence, he elevated his cousin Constantius Gallus to caesar of the eastern provinces.3738 As an extra measure to ensure the loyalty of his cousin, he married the elder of his two sisters, Constantina, to him.39
Before facing Magnentius, Constantius first came to terms with Vetranio, a loyal general in Illyricum who had recently been acclaimed emperor by his soldiers.40 Vetranio immediately sent letters to Constantius pledging his loyalty, which Constantius may have accepted simply in order to stop Magnentius from gaining more support. These events may have been spurred by the action of Constantina, who had since traveled east to marry Gallus. Constantius subsequently sent Vetranio the imperial diadem and acknowledged the general's new position as augustus.41 However, when Constantius arrived, Vetranio willingly resigned his position and accepted Constantius's offer of a comfortable retirement in Bithynia.42
In 351, Constantius clashed with Magnentius in Pannonia with a large army. The ensuing Battle of Mursa Major was one of the largest and bloodiest battles ever between two Roman armies.4344 The result was a victory for Constantius, but a costly one. Magnentius survived the battle and, determined to fight on, withdrew into northern Italy. Rather than pursuing his opponent, however, Constantius turned his attention to securing the Danubian border, where he spent the early months of 352 campaigning against the Sarmatians along the middle Danube.45 After achieving his aims, Constantius advanced on Magnentius in Italy. This action led the cities of Italy to switch their allegiance to him and eject the usurper's garrisons. Again, Magnentius withdrew, this time to southern Gaul.4647
In 353, Constantius and Magnentius met for the final time at the Battle of Mons Seleucus in southern Gaul, and again Constantius emerged the victor.48 Magnentius, realizing the futility of continuing his position, committed suicide on 10 August 353.495051
Constantius spent much of the rest of 353 and early 354 on campaign against the Alamanni on the Danube frontier. The campaign was successful and raiding by the Alamanni ceased temporarily. In the meantime, Constantius had been receiving disturbing reports regarding the actions of his cousin Gallus.52 Possibly as a result of these reports, Constantius concluded a peace with the Alamanni and traveled to Mediolanum (Milan).53
In Mediolanum, Constantius first summoned Ursicinus, Gallus's magister equitum, for reasons that remain unclear.54 Constantius then summoned Gallus and Constantina.55 Although Gallus and Constantina complied with the order at first, when Constantina died in Bithynia,56 Gallus began to hesitate. However, after some convincing by one of Constantius's agents,57 Gallus continued his journey west, passing through Constantinople and Thrace to Poetovio (Ptuj) in Pannonia.5859
In Poetovio, Gallus was arrested by the soldiers of Constantius under the command of Barbatio.60 Gallus was then moved to Pola and interrogated. Gallus claimed that it was Constantina who was to blame for all the trouble while he was in charge of the eastern provinces.61 This angered Constantius so greatly that he immediately ordered Gallus's execution.62 He soon changed his mind, however, and recanted the order.636465 Unfortunately for Gallus, this second order was delayed by Eusebius, one of Constantius's eunuchs, and Gallus was executed.66
Main article: Religious policies of Constantius II
Laws dating from the 350s prescribed the death penalty for those who performed or attended pagan sacrifices, and for the worshipping of idols.676869 Pagan temples were shut down,7071 and the Altar of Victory was removed from the Senate meeting house.72 There were also frequent episodes of ordinary Christians destroying, pillaging and desecrating many ancient pagan temples, tombs and monuments.73747576 Paganism was still popular among the population at the time. The emperor's policies were passively resisted by many governors and magistrates.777879
In spite of this, Constantius never made any attempt to disband the various Roman priestly colleges or the Vestal Virgins. He never acted against the various pagan schools. At times, he actually made some effort to protect paganism. In fact, he even ordered the election of a priest for Africa.80 Also, he remained pontifex maximus and was deified by the Roman Senate after his death. His relative moderation toward paganism is reflected by the fact that it was over twenty years after his death, during the reign of Gratian, that any pagan senator protested his treatment of their religion.81
Although often considered an Arian,82 Constantius ultimately preferred a third, compromise version that lay somewhere in between Arianism and the Nicene Creed, retrospectively called Semi-Arianism.8384 During his reign he attempted to mold the Christian church to follow this compromise position, convening several Christian councils. "Unfortunately for his memory the theologians whose advice he took were ultimately discredited and the malcontents whom he pressed to conform emerged victorious," writes the historian A. H. M. Jones. "The great councils of 359–60 are therefore not reckoned ecumenical in the tradition of the church, and Constantius II is not remembered as a restorer of unity, but as a heretic who arbitrarily imposed his will on the church."85
According to the Greek historian Philostorgius (d. 439) in his Ecclesiastical History, Constantius sent an Arian bishop known as Theophilus the Indian (also known as "Theophilus of Yemen") to Tharan Yuhanim, then the king of the South Arabian Himyarite Kingdom to convert the people to Christianity. According to the report, Theophilus succeeded in establishing three churches, one of them in the capital Zafar.86
Judaism faced some severe restrictions under Constantius, who seems to have followed an anti-Jewish policy in line with that of his father.87 This included edicts to limit the ownership of slaves by Jewish people88 and banning marriages between Jews and Christian women.89 Later edicts sought to discourage conversions from Christianity to Judaism by confiscating the apostate's property.90 However, Constantius's actions in this regard may not have been so much to do with Jewish religion as with Jewish business—apparently, privately owned Jewish businesses were often in competition with state-owned businesses. As a result, Constantius may have sought to provide an advantage to state-owned businesses by limiting the skilled workers and slaves available to Jewish businesses.91
On 11 August 355, the magister militum Claudius Silvanus revolted in Gaul. Silvanus had surrendered to Constantius after the Battle of Mursa Major. Constantius had made him magister militum in 353 with the purpose of blocking the German threats, a feat that Silvanus achieved by bribing the German tribes with the money he had collected. A plot organized by members of Constantius's court led the emperor to recall Silvanus. After Silvanus revolted, he received a letter from Constantius recalling him to Milan, but which made no reference to the revolt. Ursicinus, who was meant to replace Silvanus, bribed some troops, and Silvanus was killed.
Constantius realised that too many threats still faced the Empire, however, and he could not possibly handle all of them by himself. So on 6 November 355,92 he elevated his last remaining male relative, Julian, to the rank of caesar.93 A few days later, Julian was married to Helena, the last surviving sister of Constantius.94 Constantius soon sent Julian off to Gaul.95
Constantius spent the next few years overseeing affairs in the western part of the empire primarily from his base at Mediolanum. In April–May 357 he visited Rome for the only time in his life. The same year, he forced Sarmatian and Quadi invaders out of Pannonia and Moesia Inferior, then led a successful counter-attack across the Danube.96
In the winter of 357–58, Constantius received ambassadors from Shapur II who demanded that Rome restore the lands surrendered by Narseh.9798 Despite rejecting these terms,99100 Constantius tried to avert war with the Sassanid Empire by sending two embassies to Shapur II.101102103 Shapur II nevertheless launched another invasion of Roman Mesopotamia. In 360, when news reached Constantius that Shapur II had destroyed Singara (Sinjar),104 and taken Kiphas (Hasankeyf), Amida (Diyarbakır),105 and Ad Tigris (Cizre),106 he decided to travel east to face the re-emergent threat.
In the meantime, Julian had won some victories against the Alamanni, who had once again invaded Roman Gaul. However, when Constantius requested reinforcements from Julian's army for the eastern campaign, the Gallic legions revolted and proclaimed Julian augustus.107108109110
On account of the immediate Sassanid threat, Constantius was unable to directly respond to his cousin's usurpation, other than by sending missives in which he tried to convince Julian to resign the title of augustus and be satisfied with that of caesar. By 361, Constantius saw no alternative but to face the usurper with force, and yet the threat of the Sassanids remained. Constantius had already spent part of early 361 unsuccessfully attempting to re-take the fortress of Ad Tigris.111 After a time he had withdrawn to Antioch to regroup and prepare for a confrontation with Shapur II.112 The campaigns of the previous year had inflicted heavy losses on the Sassanids, however, and they did not attempt another round of campaigns that year. This temporary respite in hostilities allowed Constantius to turn his full attention to facing Julian.113
Constantius immediately gathered his forces and set off west. However, by the time he reached Mopsuestia in Cilicia, it was clear that he was fatally ill and would not survive to face Julian. The sources claim that realising his death was near, Constantius had himself baptised by Euzoius, the Semi-Arian bishop of Antioch, and then declared that Julian was his rightful successor.114115 Constantius II died of fever on 3 November 361.116
Like Constantine the Great, he was buried in the Church of the Holy Apostles, in a porphyry sarcophagus that was described in the 10th century by Constantine VII Porphyrogenitus in the De Ceremoniis.117
Constantius II was married three times:
First to a daughter of his half-uncle Julius Constantius, whose name is unknown. She was a full-sister of Gallus and a half-sister of Julian. She died c. 352/3.118
Second, to Eusebia, a woman of Macedonian origin, originally from the city of Thessalonica, whom Constantius married before his defeat of Magnentius in 353. She died before 361.119
Third and lastly, in 361, to Faustina, who gave birth to Constantius's only child, a posthumous daughter named Constantia, who later married Emperor Gratian.120
See also: Constantinian dynasty
Emperors are shown with a rounded-corner border with their dates as Augusti, names with a thicker border appear in both sections
1: Constantine's parents and half-siblings
2: Constantine's children
According to DiMaio and Frakes, “...Constantius is hard for the modern historian to fully understand both due to his own actions and due to the interests of the authors of primary sources for his reign.”121 A. H. M. Jones writes that he "appears in the pages of Ammianus as a conscientious emperor but a vain and stupid man, an easy prey to flatterers. He was timid and suspicious, and interested persons could easily play on his fears for their own advantage."122 However, Kent and M. and A. Hirmer suggest that the emperor "has suffered at the hands of unsympathetic authors, ecclesiastical and civil alike. To orthodox churchmen he was a bigoted supporter of the Arian heresy, to Julian the Apostate and the many who have subsequently taken his part he was a murderer, a tyrant and inept as a ruler". They go on to add, "Most contemporaries seem in fact to have held him in high esteem, and he certainly inspired loyalty in a way his brother could not".123
Eutropius wrote of him,124
He was a man of a remarkably tranquil disposition, good-natured, trusting too much to his friends and courtiers, and at last too much in the power of his wives. He conducted himself with great moderation in the commencement of his reign; he enriched his friends, and suffered none, whose active services he had experienced, to go unrewarded. He was however somewhat inclined to severity, whenever any suspicion of an attempt on the government was excited in him; otherwise he was gentle. His fortune is more to be praised in civil than in foreign wars.
The origin of the name "Julius" is not known. It may have been added to his name in honour of one of Constantine's relatives, as one view identifies a "Julia Constantia" as Constantius I's mother.[5] It was likely not in honour of Helena, mother of Constantine I, as she probably only adopted the name "Julia" just before her death.[6] /wiki/Constantius_I ↩
Jones, Martindale & Morris, p. 226. - Jones, A.H.M.; J.R. Martindale & J. Morris (1971). The Prosopography of the Later Roman Empire Volume 1: A.D. 260–395. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 0-521-07233-6. https://books.google.com/books?id=uOHw4idqAeYC ↩
Dodgeon, Greatrex & Lieu, pp. 152–153. - Dodgeon, Michael H.; Greatrex, Geoffrey; Lieu, Samuel N. C. (2002). The Roman Eastern Frontier and the Persian Wars (Part I, 226–363 AD). Routledge. ISBN 0-415-00342-3. https://books.google.com/books?id=zoZIxpQ8A2IC ↩
Julian, Orationes I, 13B ↩
Festus, breviarum 27, pp. 2–3, 67 ↩
Ammianus Marcellinus XVIII, 9, 1 ↩
Hunt 1998, p. 1. - Hunt, David (1998). "The successors of Constantine + Julian". In Averil Cameron & Peter Garnsey (eds.). The Cambridge Ancient History XIII: The Late Empire, A.D. 337–425. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 0-521-30200-5. ↩
Burgess 2008, p. 10. - Burgess, R.W. (2008). "The Summer of Blood: The 'Great Massacre' of 337 and the Promotion of the Sons of Constantine". Dumbarton Oaks Papers. 62: 5–51. JSTOR 20788042. https://www.jstor.org/stable/20788042 ↩
Hunt 1998, p. 3. - Hunt, David (1998). "The successors of Constantine + Julian". In Averil Cameron & Peter Garnsey (eds.). The Cambridge Ancient History XIII: The Late Empire, A.D. 337–425. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 0-521-30200-5. ↩
Julian, "Letter to the senate and people of Athens", 270. The full text of Letter to the senate and people of Athens at Wikisource /wiki/File:Wikisource-logo.svg ↩
Burgess 2008, p. 25. - Burgess, R.W. (2008). "The Summer of Blood: The 'Great Massacre' of 337 and the Promotion of the Sons of Constantine". Dumbarton Oaks Papers. 62: 5–51. JSTOR 20788042. https://www.jstor.org/stable/20788042 ↩
Eutropius, Historiae Romanae Breviarium X.9 /wiki/Eutropius_(historian) ↩
Julian, "Letter to the senate and people of Athens", 271. The full text of Letter to the senate and people of Athens at Wikisource /wiki/File:Wikisource-logo.svg ↩
DiMaio 1992, p. 165. - DiMaio, Michael (23 January 1992). "Per Vim, per Caedem, per Bellum : A Study of Murder and Ecclesiastical Politics in the Year 337 A.D.". Byzantion. 62: 158–211. JSTOR 44171626. https://www.jstor.org/stable/44171626 ↩
Burgess 2008, pp. 26–27. - Burgess, R.W. (2008). "The Summer of Blood: The 'Great Massacre' of 337 and the Promotion of the Sons of Constantine". Dumbarton Oaks Papers. 62: 5–51. JSTOR 20788042. https://www.jstor.org/stable/20788042 ↩
By 351–354, Constantius’s courtiers stopped denying his involvement and instead claimed he was tormented with guilt over his role in the massacre.[16][22] ↩
Hunt 1998, p. 4. - Hunt, David (1998). "The successors of Constantine + Julian". In Averil Cameron & Peter Garnsey (eds.). The Cambridge Ancient History XIII: The Late Empire, A.D. 337–425. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 0-521-30200-5. ↩
Hunt 1998, pp. 11–12. - Hunt, David (1998). "The successors of Constantine + Julian". In Averil Cameron & Peter Garnsey (eds.). The Cambridge Ancient History XIII: The Late Empire, A.D. 337–425. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 0-521-30200-5. ↩
Theodoret, Historia Ecclesiastica II, 30, 1–14, GCS ↩
Hunt 1998, p. 12. - Hunt, David (1998). "The successors of Constantine + Julian". In Averil Cameron & Peter Garnsey (eds.). The Cambridge Ancient History XIII: The Late Empire, A.D. 337–425. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 0-521-30200-5. ↩
Hunt 1998, p. 13. - Hunt, David (1998). "The successors of Constantine + Julian". In Averil Cameron & Peter Garnsey (eds.). The Cambridge Ancient History XIII: The Late Empire, A.D. 337–425. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 0-521-30200-5. ↩
Festus, Brevarium XXVII /wiki/Festus_(historian) ↩
Dingas & Winter 2007, p. 89. - Dingas, Beate; Winter, Engelbert (2007). Rome and Persia in Late Antiquity. Cambridge University Press. ↩
Hunt 1998, p. 5. - Hunt, David (1998). "The successors of Constantine + Julian". In Averil Cameron & Peter Garnsey (eds.). The Cambridge Ancient History XIII: The Late Empire, A.D. 337–425. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 0-521-30200-5. ↩
Drinkwater 2007, p. 199. - Drinkwater, John F. (2007). The Alamanni and Rome 213–496. Caracalla to Clovis. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-929568-5. https://books.google.com/books?id=wBJREAAAQBAJ ↩
Crawford 2016, p. 64. - Crawford, Peter (2016). Constantius II: Usurpers, Eunuchs, and the Antichrist. Pen & Sword. ISBN 978-1-78340-055-3. https://books.google.com/books?id=_aJBDQAAQBAJ ↩
Hunt 1998, p. 11. - Hunt, David (1998). "The successors of Constantine + Julian". In Averil Cameron & Peter Garnsey (eds.). The Cambridge Ancient History XIII: The Late Empire, A.D. 337–425. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 0-521-30200-5. ↩
Potter 2004, p. 471. - Potter, David S. (2004). The Roman Empire at Bay: AD 180–395. New York: Routledge. ISBN 0-415-10057-7. https://archive.org/details/romanempireatbay0000pott ↩
Crawford 2016, p. 72. - Crawford, Peter (2016). Constantius II: Usurpers, Eunuchs, and the Antichrist. Pen & Sword. ISBN 978-1-78340-055-3. https://books.google.com/books?id=_aJBDQAAQBAJ ↩
Errington 2006, p. 16. - Errington, R. Malcolm (2006). Roman Imperial Policy from Julian to Theodosius. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press. ISBN 0-8078-3038-0. https://archive.org/details/romanimperialpol0000erri ↩
Barnes 1993, p. 105. - Barnes, Timothy David (1993). Athanasius and Constantius: theology and politics in the Constantinian empire. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press. ISBN 0-674-05067-3. https://archive.org/details/athanasiusconsta0000barn/page/n9/mode/1up ↩
Potter 2004, p. 472. - Potter, David S. (2004). The Roman Empire at Bay: AD 180–395. New York: Routledge. ISBN 0-415-10057-7. https://archive.org/details/romanempireatbay0000pott ↩
Hunt 1998, p. 17. - Hunt, David (1998). "The successors of Constantine + Julian". In Averil Cameron & Peter Garnsey (eds.). The Cambridge Ancient History XIII: The Late Empire, A.D. 337–425. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 0-521-30200-5. ↩
Barnes 1993, p. 101. - Barnes, Timothy David (1993). Athanasius and Constantius: theology and politics in the Constantinian empire. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press. ISBN 0-674-05067-3. https://archive.org/details/athanasiusconsta0000barn/page/n9/mode/1up ↩
Hunt 1998, pp. 16–17. - Hunt, David (1998). "The successors of Constantine + Julian". In Averil Cameron & Peter Garnsey (eds.). The Cambridge Ancient History XIII: The Late Empire, A.D. 337–425. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 0-521-30200-5. ↩
Potter 2004, p. 473. - Potter, David S. (2004). The Roman Empire at Bay: AD 180–395. New York: Routledge. ISBN 0-415-10057-7. https://archive.org/details/romanempireatbay0000pott ↩
Hunt 1998, p. 20. - Hunt, David (1998). "The successors of Constantine + Julian". In Averil Cameron & Peter Garnsey (eds.). The Cambridge Ancient History XIII: The Late Empire, A.D. 337–425. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 0-521-30200-5. ↩
Potter 2004, p. 474. - Potter, David S. (2004). The Roman Empire at Bay: AD 180–395. New York: Routledge. ISBN 0-415-10057-7. https://archive.org/details/romanempireatbay0000pott ↩
Barnes 1993, p. 106. - Barnes, Timothy David (1993). Athanasius and Constantius: theology and politics in the Constantinian empire. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press. ISBN 0-674-05067-3. https://archive.org/details/athanasiusconsta0000barn/page/n9/mode/1up ↩
Hunt 1998, p. 22. - Hunt, David (1998). "The successors of Constantine + Julian". In Averil Cameron & Peter Garnsey (eds.). The Cambridge Ancient History XIII: The Late Empire, A.D. 337–425. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 0-521-30200-5. ↩
Drinkwater 2007, p. 201. - Drinkwater, John F. (2007). The Alamanni and Rome 213–496. Caracalla to Clovis. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-929568-5. https://books.google.com/books?id=wBJREAAAQBAJ ↩
Ammianus Marcellinus, Res Gestae 14.1.10 /wiki/Ammianus_Marcellinus ↩
Ammianus Marcellinus, Res Gestae XIV.10.16 /wiki/Ammianus_Marcellinus ↩
Ammianus Marcellinus, Res Gestae XIV.11.3–5 /wiki/Ammianus_Marcellinus ↩
Ammianus Marcellinus, Res Gestae XIV.11.6 /wiki/Ammianus_Marcellinus ↩
Ammianus Marcellinus, Res Gestae XIV.11.11–12 /wiki/Ammianus_Marcellinus ↩
Ammianus Marcellinus, Res Gestae XIV.11.19 /wiki/Ammianus_Marcellinus ↩
"Banchich, T. M., 'DIR-Gallus' from De Imperatoribus Romanis". Archived from the original on 10 December 2008. Retrieved 2 March 2009. https://web.archive.org/web/20081210150345/http://www.roman-emperors.org/gallus.htm ↩
Ammianus Marcellinus, Res Gestae XIV.11.20 /wiki/Ammianus_Marcellinus ↩
Ammianus Marcellinus, Res Gestae XIV.11.22 /wiki/Ammianus_Marcellinus ↩
Ammianus Marcellinus, Res Gestae XIV.11.23 /wiki/Ammianus_Marcellinus ↩
Zonaras, Extracts of History XIII.9.20 /wiki/Joannes_Zonaras ↩
Libanius, Orations XVIII.152 /wiki/Libanius ↩
Philostorgius, Historia Ecclesiastica 4.1 ↩
Kirsch, J. (2004) God against the Gods, pp.200-1, Viking Compass ↩
The Codex Theodosianus On Religion, 16.10.2 ↩
Theodosian Code 16.10.6 ↩
"'The Codex Theodosianus On Religion', XVI.x.4, 4 CE". http://www.fordham.edu/halsall/source/codex-theod1.html ↩
"A History of the Church", Philip Hughes, Sheed & Ward, rev ed 1949, vol I chapter 6.[1] Archived 23 December 2018 at the Wayback Machine http://www.ewtn.com/library/CHISTORY/HUGHHIST.TXT ↩
Sheridan, J.J. (1966) The Altar of Victor – Paganism's Last Battle. in L'Antiquite Classique 35 : 186–187. ↩
Ammianus Marcellinus Res Gestae 22.4.3 /wiki/Ammianus_Marcellinus ↩
Sozomen Ecclesiastical History 3.18. /wiki/Sozomen ↩
Theodosian Code 16.10.3 ↩
Theodosian Code 9.17.2 ↩
Ammianus Marcellinus Res Gestae 9.10, 19.12. quote summary: Ammianus describes Pagan sacrifices and worship taking place openly in Alexandria and Rome. The Roman Calendar of 354 cites many Pagan festivals as though they were still being openly observed. See also the descriptions of Pagan worship in the following works: Firmicius Maternus De Errore Profanorum Religionum; Vetus Orbis Descriptio Graeci Scriptoris sub Constantio. /wiki/Ammianus_Marcellinus ↩
Bowder, D. (1978) The Age of Constantine and Julian ↩
Vasiliev 1958, p. 68. - Vasiliev, Alexander (1958). History of the Byzantine Empire 324–1453. University of Wisconsin Press. ISBN 0299809250. https://books.google.com/books?id=EXiWAwAAQBAJ ↩
Salzman 2002, p. 182. - Salzman, Michele Renee (2002). The Making of a Christian Aristocracy: Social and Religious Change in the Western Roman Empire. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. ISBN 978-0-674-00641-6. https://books.google.com/books?id=9JGzYaUQyt4C ↩
Jones 1964, p. 118. - Jones, A. H. M. The Later Roman Empire, 284–602: A Social, Economic, and Administrative Survey [Paperback, vol. 1] ISBN 0-8018-3353-1 Basil Blackwell Ltd. 1964. ↩
Pelikan, J. J., The Christian Tradition (1989), pp. 209–210 ↩
Gaddis 2005, p. 92. - Gaddis, Michael. There Is No Crime for Those Who Have Christ. Religious violence in the Christian Roman Empire. University of California Press, 2005. ISBN 978-0-520-24104-6. ↩
Fisher, Greg (2020). Rome, Persia, and Arabia: shaping the Middle East from Pompey to Muhammad. London & New York: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group. p. 90. ISBN 978-0-415-72880-5. 978-0-415-72880-5 ↩
Schäfer 2003, p. 180-181. - Schäfer, Peter (2003). The History of the Jews in the Greco-Roman World. Psychology Press. ISBN 978-0-415-30585-3. https://books.google.com/books?id=YBarWAR2qVkC ↩
Codex Theodosianus 16.9.2 /wiki/Codex_Theodosianus ↩
Codex Theodosianus 16.8.7 /wiki/Codex_Theodosianus ↩
Schäfer 2003, pp. 180–181. - Schäfer, Peter (2003). The History of the Jews in the Greco-Roman World. Psychology Press. ISBN 978-0-415-30585-3. https://books.google.com/books?id=YBarWAR2qVkC ↩
Ammianus Marcellinus, Res Gestae XV.8.17 /wiki/Ammianus_Marcellinus ↩
Ammianus Marcellinus, Res Gestae XV.8.5–16 /wiki/Ammianus_Marcellinus ↩
Ammianus Marcellinus, Res Gestae XV.8.18 /wiki/Ammianus_Marcellinus ↩
Ammianus Marcellinus, Res Gestae XVI.12 /wiki/Ammianus_Marcellinus ↩
Ammianus Marcellinus, Res Gestae XVII.5.3–8 /wiki/Ammianus_Marcellinus ↩
Zonaras, Extracts of History XII.9.25–27 /wiki/Joannes_Zonaras ↩
Ammianus Marcellinus, Res Gestae XVII.5.9–14 /wiki/Ammianus_Marcellinus ↩
Zonaras, Extracts of History XII.9.28–29 /wiki/Joannes_Zonaras ↩
Libanius, Epistle 331 /wiki/Libanius ↩
Ammianus Marcellinus, Res Gestae XVII.14.1–3 & XVIII.6.17–18 /wiki/Ammianus_Marcellinus ↩
Eunapius, Lives of the Sophists VI. 5.1–10 /wiki/Eunapius ↩
Ammianus Marcellinus, Res Gestae XX.6 /wiki/Ammianus_Marcellinus ↩
Ammianus Marcellinus, Res Gestae XIX /wiki/Ammianus_Marcellinus ↩
Ammianus Marcellinus, Res Gestae XX.7.1–16 /wiki/Ammianus_Marcellinus ↩
Drinkwater 2007, p. 253. - Drinkwater, John F. (2007). The Alamanni and Rome 213–496. Caracalla to Clovis. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-929568-5. https://books.google.com/books?id=wBJREAAAQBAJ ↩
Potter 2004, p. 505. - Potter, David S. (2004). The Roman Empire at Bay: AD 180–395. New York: Routledge. ISBN 0-415-10057-7. https://archive.org/details/romanempireatbay0000pott ↩
Hunt 1998, p. 57. - Hunt, David (1998). "The successors of Constantine + Julian". In Averil Cameron & Peter Garnsey (eds.). The Cambridge Ancient History XIII: The Late Empire, A.D. 337–425. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 0-521-30200-5. ↩
Ammianus and Julian both portrayed Constantius's order as fueled by envy of the Caesar’s growing popularity, with the additional intent of weakening his military position, as he had previously done with Gallus.[101] Crawford was skeptical of such a portrayal, believing that Julian would’ve needed far less troops than Constantius if he was really as successful as he portrayed himself,[102] while Potter dismissed the idea, believing that the necessity of Constantius's act for his plan was sufficient explanation.[99] ↩
Ammianus Marcellinus, Res Gestae XX.11.6–25 /wiki/Ammianus_Marcellinus ↩
Ammianus Marcellinus, Res Gestae XXI.7.7 & 13.1–5 /wiki/Ammianus_Marcellinus ↩
Vagi 2001, p. 508. - Vagi, David L. (2001). Coinage and History of the Roman Empire, c. 82 B.C. – A.D. 480. Fitzroy Dearborn. ISBN 978-1-57958-316-3. ↩
Ammianus only recorded Constantius's legitimization of Julian as a rumor. While Hunt and Matthews treated the report with caution,[106][107] Kelly considered it to be true, observing that the act prevented civil war and protected his posthumous reputation, as well as his wife’s unborn child.[108] Errington and Crawford also accepted it as true, viewing it as a display of pragmatism and dynastic solidarity.[109][110] ↩
The manuscript of Ammianus Marcellinus, Res Gestae 21.15.2 reads tertium nonarum Octobrium, which is the equivalent of 5 October. The latest editor of the Res Gestae accepts Otto Seeck's emendation tertium nonarum Novembrium which is the equivalent of 3 November. T.D. Barnes (Classical Philology, 88 [1993], pp. 64f) provides indirect evidence showing 3 November is a better fit. ↩
Vasiliev, A. A. (1948). "Imperial Porphyry Sarcophagi in Constantinople" (PDF). Dumbarton Oaks Papers. 4: 1+3–26. doi:10.2307/1291047. JSTOR 1291047. Archived (PDF) from the original on 31 December 2019. https://lucazavagno.files.wordpress.com/2012/12/vasiliev.pdf ↩
Banchich, Thomas M. "Gallus Caesar (15 March 351 – 354 A.D.)". De Imperatoribus Romanis. Archived from the original on 10 December 2008. Retrieved 7 September 2018. https://web.archive.org/web/20081210150345/http://www.roman-emperors.org/gallus.htm ↩
Jones, Martindale & Morris, pp. 300–301. - Jones, A.H.M.; J.R. Martindale & J. Morris (1971). The Prosopography of the Later Roman Empire Volume 1: A.D. 260–395. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 0-521-07233-6. https://books.google.com/books?id=uOHw4idqAeYC ↩
Marcellinus, Ammianus (1940). The Roman History of Ammianus Marcellinus. Loeb Classical Library. Vol. 2, Book 21, chapter 15. Translated by Rolfe, J. C. Harvard University Press. Retrieved 11 April 2011. /wiki/Ammianus_Marcellinus ↩
Michael DiMaio Jr. and Robert Frakes, Constantius II (337–361 A.D.) Archived 8 March 2023 at the Wayback Machine http://www.roman-emperors.sites.luc.edu/constaii.htm ↩
Jones 1964, p. 116. - Jones, A. H. M. The Later Roman Empire, 284–602: A Social, Economic, and Administrative Survey [Paperback, vol. 1] ISBN 0-8018-3353-1 Basil Blackwell Ltd. 1964. ↩
Kent, J.P.C., Hirmer, M. & Hirmer, A. Roman Coins (1978), p. 54 ↩
Eutropius, Historiae Romanae Breviarium X.15 ↩