Consider the braid group B n {\displaystyle B_{n}} to be the mapping class group of a disc with n marked points, P n {\displaystyle P_{n}} . The Lawrence–Krammer representation is defined as the action of B n {\displaystyle B_{n}} on the homology of a certain covering space of the configuration space C 2 P n {\displaystyle C_{2}P_{n}} . Specifically, the first integral homology group of C 2 P n {\displaystyle C_{2}P_{n}} is isomorphic to Z n + 1 {\displaystyle \mathbb {Z} ^{n+1}} , and the subgroup of H 1 ( C 2 P n , Z ) {\displaystyle H_{1}(C_{2}P_{n},\mathbb {Z} )} invariant under the action of B n {\displaystyle B_{n}} is primitive, free abelian, and of rank 2. Generators for this invariant subgroup are denoted by q , t {\displaystyle q,t} .
The covering space of C 2 P n {\displaystyle C_{2}P_{n}} corresponding to the kernel of the projection map
is called the Lawrence–Krammer cover and is denoted C 2 P n ¯ {\displaystyle {\overline {C_{2}P_{n}}}} . Diffeomorphisms of P n {\displaystyle P_{n}} act on P n {\displaystyle P_{n}} , thus also on C 2 P n {\displaystyle C_{2}P_{n}} , moreover they lift uniquely to diffeomorphisms of C 2 P n ¯ {\displaystyle {\overline {C_{2}P_{n}}}} which restrict to the identity on the co-dimension two boundary stratum (where both points are on the boundary circle). The action of B n {\displaystyle B_{n}} on
thought of as a
is the Lawrence–Krammer representation. The group H 2 ( C 2 P n ¯ , Z ) {\displaystyle H_{2}({\overline {C_{2}P_{n}}},\mathbb {Z} )} is known to be a free Z ⟨ t ± , q ± ⟩ {\displaystyle \mathbb {Z} \langle t^{\pm },q^{\pm }\rangle } -module, of rank n ( n − 1 ) / 2 {\displaystyle n(n-1)/2} .
Using Bigelow's conventions for the Lawrence–Krammer representation, generators for the group H 2 ( C 2 P n ¯ , Z ) {\displaystyle H_{2}({\overline {C_{2}P_{n}}},\mathbb {Z} )} are denoted v j , k {\displaystyle v_{j,k}} for 1 ≤ j < k ≤ n {\displaystyle 1\leq j<k\leq n} . Letting σ i {\displaystyle \sigma _{i}} denote the standard Artin generators of the braid group, we obtain the expression:
σ i ⋅ v j , k = { v j , k i ∉ { j − 1 , j , k − 1 , k } , q v i , k + ( q 2 − q ) v i , j + ( 1 − q ) v j , k i = j − 1 v j + 1 , k i = j ≠ k − 1 , q v j , i + ( 1 − q ) v j , k − ( q 2 − q ) t v i , k i = k − 1 ≠ j , v j , k + 1 i = k , − t q 2 v j , k i = j = k − 1. {\displaystyle \sigma _{i}\cdot v_{j,k}=\left\{{\begin{array}{lr}v_{j,k}&i\notin \{j-1,j,k-1,k\},\\qv_{i,k}+(q^{2}-q)v_{i,j}+(1-q)v_{j,k}&i=j-1\\v_{j+1,k}&i=j\neq k-1,\\qv_{j,i}+(1-q)v_{j,k}-(q^{2}-q)tv_{i,k}&i=k-1\neq j,\\v_{j,k+1}&i=k,\\-tq^{2}v_{j,k}&i=j=k-1.\end{array}}\right.}
Stephen Bigelow and Daan Krammer have given independent proofs that the Lawrence–Krammer representation is faithful.
The Lawrence–Krammer representation preserves a non-degenerate sesquilinear form which is known to be negative-definite Hermitian provided q , t {\displaystyle q,t} are specialized to suitable unit complex numbers (q near 1 and t near i). Thus the braid group is a subgroup of the unitary group of square matrices of size n ( n − 1 ) / 2 {\displaystyle n(n-1)/2} . Recently2 it has been shown that the image of the Lawrence–Krammer representation is a dense subgroup of the unitary group in this case.
The sesquilinear form has the explicit description:
⟨ v i , j , v k , l ⟩ = − ( 1 − t ) ( 1 + q t ) ( q − 1 ) 2 t − 2 q − 3 { − q 2 t 2 ( q − 1 ) i = k < j < l or i < k < j = l − ( q − 1 ) k = i < l < j or k < i < j = l t ( q − 1 ) i < j = k < l q 2 t ( q − 1 ) k < l = i < j − t ( q − 1 ) 2 ( 1 + q t ) i < k < j < l ( q − 1 ) 2 ( 1 + q t ) k < i < l < j ( 1 − q t ) ( 1 + q 2 t ) k = i , j = l 0 otherwise {\displaystyle \langle v_{i,j},v_{k,l}\rangle =-(1-t)(1+qt)(q-1)^{2}t^{-2}q^{-3}\left\{{\begin{array}{lr}-q^{2}t^{2}(q-1)&i=k<j<l{\text{ or }}i<k<j=l\\-(q-1)&k=i<l<j{\text{ or }}k<i<j=l\\t(q-1)&i<j=k<l\\q^{2}t(q-1)&k<l=i<j\\-t(q-1)^{2}(1+qt)&i<k<j<l\\(q-1)^{2}(1+qt)&k<i<l<j\\(1-qt)(1+q^{2}t)&k=i,j=l\\0&{\text{otherwise}}\\\end{array}}\right.}
Bigelow, Stephen (2003), "The Lawrence–Krammer representation", Topology and geometry of manifolds, Proc. Sympos. Pure Math., vol. 71, Providence, RI: Amer. Math. Soc., pp. 51–68, MR 2024629 /wiki/Stephen_Bigelow ↩
Budney, Ryan (2005), "On the image of the Lawrence–Krammer representation", Journal of Knot Theory and Its Ramifications, 14 (6): 773–789, arXiv:math/0202246, doi:10.1142/S0218216505004044, MR 2172897, S2CID 14196563 /wiki/Journal_of_Knot_Theory_and_Its_Ramifications ↩