Menu
Home
People
Places
Arts
History
Plants & Animals
Science
Life & Culture
Technology
Reference.org
Remote sensing atmospheric boundary layer
open-in-new
<h2 id="planetary-boundary-layer">Planetary boundary layer</h2> <p>The planetary boundary layer is the portion of the troposphere that is influenced by the interaction with the surface of the earth and will adjust to surface forcings within a timescale of 1 hour.<a class="footnote-ref" id="fnref:2" href="#fn:2"><sup>2</sup></a> The planetary boundary layer is characterized by turbulence during the daytime and by stability during the night. At the top of the planetary boundary layer, there is a stable layer that is frequently termed the inversion layer as temperature tends to increase with height in contrast to much of the troposphere. The planetary boundary layer can have lower level clouds located around the capping inversion top. The two main types of clouds within the planetary boundary layer are fair-weather cumulus clouds and stratocumulus clouds. The underlying surface primarily determines the type of cloud produced within the planetary boundary layer. The presence of the capping inversion can also trap aerosols within the planetary boundary layer. The increase of anthropogenic aerosols from burning fossil fuels can have significant impacts on precipitation and climate.<a class="footnote-ref" id="fnref:3" href="#fn:3"><sup>3</sup></a> </p> <h2 id="satellite-remote-sensing">Satellite Remote Sensing</h2> <p>Satellite measurements have the advantage of being able to sample meteorological variables in regions that have little measurement systems. Many instruments have been created to help observe the atmosphere for both research and weather prediction. One of the first successful satellite missions for weather radar observations was the <a href="/facts/Television_Infrared_Observation_Satellite/JqgnoetN">Television Infrared Observation Satellite</a> (TIROS). This instrument paved the way for more weather satellite systems that utilize the visible, infrared and microwave radiation spectrum. Current remote sensing instruments that can help detect planetary boundary layer phenomenon include the <a href="/facts/Moderate-Resolution_Imaging_Spectroradiometer/8ScNa8BC">Moderate-Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer</a> (MODIS) aboard <a href="/facts/Terra_(satellite)/HFQuzF66">Terra</a> and <a href="/facts/Aqua_(satellite)/QXaLRTAv">Aqua</a> as well as CALIOP (Cloud-Aerosol Lidar with Orthogonal Polarization) aboard <a href="/facts/CALIPSO/VLqkoF0j">CALIPSO</a>. While MODIS and many other satellites are passive remote sensors, active remote sensors such as CALIPSO provide greater accuracy for height retrievals. Satellite measurements have been used to determine the dynamical conditions that produce planetary boundary layer clouds and the climatological regions of where these clouds occur.<a class="footnote-ref" id="fnref:4" href="#fn:4"><sup>4</sup></a> </p> <h2 id="planetary-boundary-layer-clouds">Planetary boundary layer clouds</h2> <h3>Remote sensing of mesoscale cellular convection</h3> <p>Mesoscale cellular convection (MCC) is a form of buoyantly driven convection that can provide the planetary boundary layer with cumulus clouds at the top of the boundary layer. MCC generally occurs over ocean regions and is primarily found off the coasts of major continents particularly in North and South America.<a class="footnote-ref" id="fnref:5" href="#fn:5"><sup>5</sup></a> MCC is a form of the <a href="/facts/Rayleigh%E2%80%93B%C3%A9nard_convection/98HjP0ky">Bénard</a> cell where the fluid will rise or fall in hexagonal cells creating hexagonal cloud structure. The capping inversion of the planetary boundary layer acts as a lid for the convection creating a horizontal plane for the hexagonal cloud structures. Satellite observations have been imperative for understanding the horizontal scale and the vertical scale of these cloud formations. MCC is generally too small for synoptic scale measurements, but too large for single point measurements. However, satellite observations are able to monitor the development of the cloud patterns because of their large field of view.<a class="footnote-ref" id="fnref:6" href="#fn:6"><sup>6</sup></a> Satellites images from TIROS helped to highlight one of the main differences between laboratory convection cells and those that occur in the atmosphere. The ratio of the diameter of the hexagon compared to the depth of the cloud was much larger in the atmosphere compared to the same ratio calculated in controlled experiments. This difference showed that viscosity and heat conduction were important for the laboratory measurements, but eddy diffusion of heat and momentum dominated the atmospheric cells.<a class="footnote-ref" id="fnref:7" href="#fn:7"><sup>7</sup></a> Wind shear must be low to form MCC cells otherwise cloud streaks will form in the direction of the wind shear. The cloud formations that occur as part of MCC can be placed into two categories: open cells and closed cells. </p> <h3>Open cells</h3> <p>Open cells are characterized by a cloud free region in the middle of the hexagonal formation with cloudy regions in the outer edge of the hexagon. The open cell will have slow descending motion in the middle with faster rising motion on the edges forming the hexagonal cloud shape. They tend to form over colder water such as those that exist off the Californian coast. </p><p>While places such as the Californian coast regularly produce open cellular convection, atmospheric storm systems can also spur the production of open cellular clouds in regions of low climatological production. Open cellular patterns can often be found behind cold fronts in the cold unstable air, and produce multiple cloud types including cumulus congenstus, cumulonimbus, and stratocumulus clouds.<a class="footnote-ref" id="fnref:8" href="#fn:8"><sup>8</sup></a> However, the open cells formed in subtropical regions are not normally associated with synoptic storms. </p> <h3>Closed cells</h3> <p>Closed cells contain cloud filled regions in the center of the hexagon formation with cloud free regions on the edge of the hexagon. The closed cell has slow rising motion in the middle and faster descending motion at the edges. Closed cells tend to occur over warmer waters such as those associated with the Kuroshio Current and the Gulf Stream. </p><p>Closed cellular patterns are generally formed under weak convective mixing in the lower levels with an inversion layer cap. They commonly occur in the eastern sections of subtropical high pressure regions or in the southeastern quadrant of polar highs. </p> <h2 id="aerosols-from-satellites">Aerosols from Satellites</h2> <p>The CALIOP on board CALIPSO allows for the measurements of different aerosol particles by measuring the backscatter at wavelengths of 1064 and 532 nanometers with the ability to receive two orthogonal components in the 532 nm wavelength.<a class="footnote-ref" id="fnref:9" href="#fn:9"><sup>9</sup></a> Without the presence of optically thick clouds, aerosol layers within the planetary boundary layer may be measured and provides a great technique for measuring aerosol pollution. Ground-based <a href="/facts/Lidar/b9SPUmLM">lidar</a> have shown agreement with CALIOP in measuring isolated aerosol layers above the Seoul metropolitan area.<a class="footnote-ref" id="fnref:10" href="#fn:10"><sup>10</sup></a> </p><p>CALIPSO has also been used in conjunction with the MODIS data to determine how aerosols within the planetary boundary layer might alter low planetary boundary layer stratus clouds. The detection of biomass burning aerosols were shown to decrease the cloud droplet radius within these warm layer clouds in agreement with the <a href="/facts/Albrecht_effect/EBGjauFG">Albrecht effect</a>, while simultaneously decreasing <a href="/facts/Liquid_water_path/5UVglIJy">liquid water path</a> in contrast to the Albrecht effect.<a class="footnote-ref" id="fnref:11" href="#fn:11"><sup>11</sup></a> </p> <h2 id="boundary-layer-height">Boundary layer height</h2> <p>The boundary layer tends to have higher moisture values and greater aerosol amounts which results in higher scattering of light within the boundary layer. With remote sensing instruments, the boundary layer height can be detected based on these principles. Using the lidar on board CALIPSO, boundary layer height estimates have been made and compared with <a href="/facts/Radiosonde/NRNr47JN">radiosonde</a> and <a href="/facts/ECMWF_re-analysis/C637rXUz">ECMWF re-analysis</a> data and have shown high correlations between the remote sensing estimated value and the measured radiosonde values.<a class="footnote-ref" id="fnref:12" href="#fn:12"><sup>12</sup></a> </p><p>The boundary layer height can be derived in a few different ways from lidar data including the maximum variance technique, which states that the maximum in the variance of the backscatter occurs at the top of the boundary layer. Within the entrainment zone, cleaner free troposphere eddies will mix with more polluted boundary layer eddies resulting in high variances at the height of the entrainment layer.<a class="footnote-ref" id="fnref:13" href="#fn:13"><sup>13</sup></a> The use of satellite derived boundary layer heights provides another method for verifying climate model output. Some remote sensing instruments have limitations. Since CALIOP relies on the use of backscattered light, daytime retrievals can contain high signal to noise ratios as sunlight can add background noise. Nighttime retrievals </p> <h2 id="boundary-layer-composition">Boundary layer composition</h2> <p>Under suitable conditions, specialized lidar techniques can be used to determine the boundary layer composition. Lidar pulses used for remote sensing get pulse echoes off the ground and off clouds. When there is a layer of broken clouds at the top of the boundary layer, <a href="/facts/Lidar/b9SPUmLM">IPDA lidar</a> techniques used for atmospheric composition remote sensing can obtain the boundary layer composition.<a class="footnote-ref" id="fnref:14" href="#fn:14"><sup>14</sup></a> </p> <h2 id="references">References</h2> <ol> <li id="fn:1"><p>Jensen, Michael (2008). "Investigation of Regional and Seasonal Variations in Marine Boundary Properties from MODIS Observations". Journal of Climate. 21 (19): 4955–4973. CiteSeerX 10.1.1.556.9408. doi:10.1175/2008JCLI1974.1. <a href="/wiki/CiteSeerX_(identifier)" target="_blank">/wiki/CiteSeerX_(identifier)</a> <a href="#fnref:1" class="footnote-back-ref">↩</a></p></li> <li id="fn:2"><p>Stull, Rolald B. (1988). An Introduction to Boundary Layer Meteorology. Kluwer Academic Publishers. p. 3. <a href="#fnref:2" class="footnote-back-ref">↩</a></p></li> <li id="fn:3"><p>Albrecht, B.A. (1989). "Aerosols, Cloud Microphysics, and Fractional Cloudiness". Science. 245 (4923): 1227–30. Bibcode:1989Sci...245.1227A. doi:10.1126/science.245.4923.1227. PMID 17747885. <a href="/wiki/Bibcode_(identifier)" target="_blank">/wiki/Bibcode_(identifier)</a> <a href="#fnref:3" class="footnote-back-ref">↩</a></p></li> <li id="fn:4"><p>Anderson, Ralph; Farr, G. (1974). Application of Meteorological Satellite Data in Analysis and Forecasting (Report). National Environmental Satellite Center. Archived from the original on March 4, 2016. Retrieved 12 May 2014. <a href="https://web.archive.org/web/20160304054126/http://oai.dtic.mil/oai/oai?verb=getRecord&metadataPrefix=html&identifier=AD0786137" target="_blank">https://web.archive.org/web/20160304054126/http://oai.dtic.mil/oai/oai?verb=getRecord&metadataPrefix=html&identifier=AD0786137</a> <a href="#fnref:4" class="footnote-back-ref">↩</a></p></li> <li id="fn:5"><p>Agee, Ernest (1984). "Observations from Space and Thermal Convection: A Historical Prospective". Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society. 65 (9): 938–949. doi:10.1175/1520-0477(1984)065<0938:OFSATC>2.0.CO;2. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175%2F1520-0477%281984%29065%3C0938%3AOFSATC%3E2.0.CO%3B2" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175%2F1520-0477%281984%29065%3C0938%3AOFSATC%3E2.0.CO%3B2</a> <a href="#fnref:5" class="footnote-back-ref">↩</a></p></li> <li id="fn:6"><p>Agee, Ernest (1973). "A Review of Mesoscale Cellular Convection". Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society. 54 (10): 1004–1012. doi:10.1175/1520-0477(1973)054<1004:AROMCC>2.0.CO;2. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175%2F1520-0477%281973%29054%3C1004%3AAROMCC%3E2.0.CO%3B2" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175%2F1520-0477%281973%29054%3C1004%3AAROMCC%3E2.0.CO%3B2</a> <a href="#fnref:6" class="footnote-back-ref">↩</a></p></li> <li id="fn:7"><p>Agee, Ernest (1984). "Observations from Space and Thermal Convection: A Historical Prospective". Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society. 65 (9): 938–949. doi:10.1175/1520-0477(1984)065<0938:OFSATC>2.0.CO;2. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175%2F1520-0477%281984%29065%3C0938%3AOFSATC%3E2.0.CO%3B2" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175%2F1520-0477%281984%29065%3C0938%3AOFSATC%3E2.0.CO%3B2</a> <a href="#fnref:7" class="footnote-back-ref">↩</a></p></li> <li id="fn:8"><p>Anderson, Ralph; Farr, G. (1974). Application of Meteorological Satellite Data in Analysis and Forecasting (Report). National Environmental Satellite Center. Archived from the original on March 4, 2016. Retrieved 12 May 2014. <a href="https://web.archive.org/web/20160304054126/http://oai.dtic.mil/oai/oai?verb=getRecord&metadataPrefix=html&identifier=AD0786137" target="_blank">https://web.archive.org/web/20160304054126/http://oai.dtic.mil/oai/oai?verb=getRecord&metadataPrefix=html&identifier=AD0786137</a> <a href="#fnref:8" class="footnote-back-ref">↩</a></p></li> <li id="fn:9"><p>"CALIPSO Payload". NASA. Retrieved 14 May 2014. <a href="https://www-calipso.larc.nasa.gov/about/payload.php#CALIOP" target="_blank">https://www-calipso.larc.nasa.gov/about/payload.php#CALIOP</a> <a href="#fnref:9" class="footnote-back-ref">↩</a></p></li> <li id="fn:10"><p>Kim, W. (2008). "Validation of aerosol and cloud layer structures from the space-borne lidar CALIOP using a ground-based lidar in Seoul, Korea". Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics. 8 (13): 3705–3720. doi:10.5194/acp-8-3705-2008. <a href="https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00328221/document" target="_blank">https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00328221/document</a> <a href="#fnref:10" class="footnote-back-ref">↩</a></p></li> <li id="fn:11"><p>Constantino, L. (2012). "Aerosol indirect effect on warm clouds over South-East Atlantic, from co-located MODIS and CALIPSO observations". Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics. 13: 69–88. doi:10.5194/acp-13-69-2013. <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194%2Facp-13-69-2013" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194%2Facp-13-69-2013</a> <a href="#fnref:11" class="footnote-back-ref">↩</a></p></li> <li id="fn:12"><p>Leventidou, E (August 2013). "Factors affecting the comparisons of boundary layer height retrievals from CALIPSO, ECMWF and radiosondes over Thessaloniki, Greece". Atmospheric Environment. 74: 360–366. doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2013.04.007. <a href="/wiki/Doi_(identifier)" target="_blank">/wiki/Doi_(identifier)</a> <a href="#fnref:12" class="footnote-back-ref">↩</a></p></li> <li id="fn:13"><p>Jordan, N (2010). "Validation of Goddard Earth Observing System‐version 5 MERRA boundary layer heights using CALIPSO". Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres. 115 (D24): D24218. Bibcode:2010JGRD..11524218J. doi:10.1029/2009JD013777. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029%2F2009JD013777" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029%2F2009JD013777</a> <a href="#fnref:13" class="footnote-back-ref">↩</a></p></li> <li id="fn:14"><p>Ramanathan, Anand K.; Mao, Jianping; Abshire, James B.; Allan, Graham R. (2015-03-28). "Remote sensing measurements of the CO2 mixing ratio in the planetary boundary layer using cloud slicing with airborne lidar". Geophysical Research Letters. 42 (6): 2014GL062749. doi:10.1002/2014GL062749. ISSN 1944-8007. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002%2F2014GL062749" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002%2F2014GL062749</a> <a href="#fnref:14" class="footnote-back-ref">↩</a></p></li> </ol>