Given a transfer function,
with the closed-loop transfer function defined as,
the Nichols plots displays 20 log 10 ( | G ( s ) | ) {\displaystyle 20\log _{10}(|G(s)|)} versus arg ( G ( s ) ) {\displaystyle \arg(G(s))} . Loci of constant 20 log 10 ( | M ( s ) | ) {\displaystyle 20\log _{10}(|M(s)|)} and arg ( M ( s ) ) {\displaystyle \arg(M(s))} are overlaid to allow the designer to obtain the closed loop transfer function directly from the open loop transfer function. Thus, the frequency ω {\displaystyle \omega } is the parameter along the curve. This plot may be compared to the Bode plot in which the two inter-related graphs - 20 log 10 ( | G ( s ) | ) {\displaystyle 20\log _{10}(|G(s)|)} versus log 10 ( ω ) {\displaystyle \log _{10}(\omega )} and arg ( G ( s ) ) {\displaystyle \arg(G(s))} versus log 10 ( ω ) {\displaystyle \log _{10}(\omega )} ) - are plotted.
In feedback control design, the plot is useful for assessing the stability and robustness of a linear system. This application of the Nichols plot is central to the quantitative feedback theory (QFT) of Horowitz and Sidi, which is a well known method for robust control system design.
In most cases, arg ( G ( s ) ) {\displaystyle \arg(G(s))} refers to the phase of the system's response. Although similar to a Nyquist plot, a Nichols plot is plotted in a Cartesian coordinate system while a Nyquist plot is plotted in a Polar coordinate system.
Isaac M. Howowitz, Synthesis of Feedback Systems, Academic Press, 1963, Lib Congress 63-12033 p. 194-198 ↩
Boris J. Lurie and Paul J. Enright, Classical Feedback Control, Marcel Dekker, 2000, ISBN 0-8247-0370-7 p. 10 /wiki/ISBN_(identifier) ↩
Allen Stubberud, Ivan Williams, and Joseph DeStefano, Shaums Outline Feedback and Control Systems, McGraw-Hill, 1995, ISBN 0-07-017052-5 ch. 17 /wiki/ISBN_(identifier) ↩