Integration competency center

<h2 id="overview">Overview</h2>
<p>Breaking down the acronym may enhance understanding. Integration refers to the objective of the ICC to take a <a href="/facts/Holism/QnIpnLr6">holistic</a> perspective and optimize certain qualities such as cost efficiency, <a href="/facts/Organizational_agility/0Ey0zwel">organizational agility</a> and effectiveness, <a href="/facts/Operational_risk/71tURHLw">operational risk</a>, customer (internal or external) experience, etc. across multiple functional groups. Competency refers to the expertise, knowledge or capability that the ICC offers as services. Center means that the service is managed or coordinated from a common (central) point independent from the functional areas that it supports.
</p><p>Large organizations are usually sub-divided into functional areas such as marketing, sales, distribution, finance or <a href="/facts/Human_resource_management/G2u0Setl">human resources</a>, to name just a few. These functional groups have separate operations, are <i>vertically integrated</i> and are sometimes referred to as "silos" or "stovepipes". From an organizational perspective, an ICC is a group of people with special skills who are centrally coordinated, and offer services to accomplish a mission that requires separate functional areas to work together.
</p><p>Key objectives of an ICC include:
</p>
<ul><li>Lead and support <a href="/facts/Enterprise_integration/0DnXY9Qm">enterprise integration</a> (data, system and process) projects with the cooperation/coordination of subject matter experts.</li>
<li>Promote enterprise integration as a formal discipline. For example, data integration will include <a href="/facts/Data_warehousing/we5rblq9">data warehousing</a>, <a href="/facts/Data_migration/Eh3EE9Kg">data migration</a>, <a href="/facts/Data_quality/Hr9APbfG">data quality</a> management, data integration for <a href="/facts/Service_oriented_architecture/g8krR0dk">service-oriented architecture</a> deployments, and <a href="/facts/Data_synchronization/rjQV9RkX">data synchronization</a>. Similar systems integration will include common messaging services, business service virtualization, etc.</li>
<li>Develop staff specialists in integration processes and operations and leverage their expertise company-wide.</li>
<li>Assess and select integration technology and tools from the marketplace.</li>
<li>Manage integration pilots and projects across the organization.</li>
<li>Optimize integration investments across the entire enterprise.</li>
<li>Leverage economies of scale for the integration tools portfolio at the enterprise level.</li></ul>
<p>ICCs allow companies to:
</p>
<ul><li>Optimize scarce resources by combining integration skills, resources, and processes into one group.</li>
<li>Reduce project delivery times, development and maintenance costs through effectiveness and efficiency.</li>
<li>Improve ROI through creation and reuse of enterprise assets like source definitions, application interfaces, and codified business rules.</li>
<li>Decrease duplication of integration related efforts across the enterprise.</li>
<li>Build on past successes instead of reinventing the wheel with each project.</li>
<li>Lower total technology cost of ownership by leveraging technology investments across multiple projects.</li></ul>
<p>An ICC may be a temporary group in support of a <a href="/facts/Program_management/sS77vjgb">program</a> or a permanent part of the organization. Furthermore, ICCs can be established at various scales or levels, within divisions of a company, at the enterprise level, or across multiple companies in a supply chain.
</p>
<h2 id="history">History</h2>
<p>The term "integration competency center" and its acronym ICC was popularized by Roy Schulte of <a href="/facts/Gartner/T4pPSLWF">Gartner</a> in a series of articles and conference presentations beginning in 2001 with <i>The Integration Competency Center</i>.<a class="footnote-ref" id="fnref:1" href="#fn:1"><sup>1</sup></a> He picked up the term from one of his colleagues, Gary Long, who found some of his clients using it (they took the established term “competency center” and applied it to integration). Prior to that (from 1997 to 2001) Gartner had been referring to it as the <i>central integration team</i>. The concept itself (even before it was given a label) goes back to 1996 in one of Gartner's first reports on integration. 
</p><p>A major milestone was the publication in 2005 of the first book on the topic: <i>Integration Competency Center: An Implementation Methodology</i><a class="footnote-ref" id="fnref:2" href="#fn:2"><sup>2</sup></a> by <i>John G. Schmidt</i> and <i>David Lyle</i>. The book introduced five ICC organizational models and explored the people, process and technology dimensions of ICCs. Several reviews of the book can be found at <a href="https://web.archive.org/web/20071012015134/http://blogs.ittoolbox.com/eai/business/archives/soa-competency-center-5731">IT Toolbox</a> and at <a href="https://www.amazon.com/Integration-Competency-Center-Implementation-Methodology/dp/0976916304">Amazon</a>. The concept of integration as a competency in the IT domain has now survived for over 10 years and appears to be picking up momentum and broad-based acceptance.
</p><p>These days ICCs are often called integration centers of excellence, SOA centers of excellence, data management centers of excellence and other variants. The most advanced ICCs are using <a href="/facts/Lean_Integration/RB2TQuwq">Lean Integration</a> practices to optimize end-to-end processes and to drive continuous improvements. Universities are also beginning to include integration topics in their MBA programs and computer science curricula. For example, The College of Information Sciences and Technology at <a href="/facts/Penn_State_University/WMQagtjM">Penn State University</a> has established an Enterprise Informatics and Integration Center with the following mission:
</p><p>"<i>The Enterprise Informatics and Integration Center (EI²) will actively engage industry, non-profit, and government agency leaders to address critical issues in enterprise processes, knowledge management, and decision making.</i>"
</p>
<h2 id="operating-models">Operating models</h2>
<p>There are a number of ways an ICC can be organized and a wide range of responsibilities with which it can be chartered. The ICC book<a class="footnote-ref" id="fnref:3" href="#fn:3"><sup>3</sup></a> introduced five ICC organizational models and explored the people, process and technology dimensions of ICCs. They include:
</p>
<h3>Best practices ICC</h3>
<p>The primary function of this ICC model is to document practices considered effective and widely applicable. It does not include a central support or development team to implement these standards across projects and typically does not manage metadata. To implement a best practices ICC, companies require a development environment that accommodates diverse teams and allows them to enhance and extend existing systems and processes. This team is often a subset of an existing enterprise architecture capability and usually consists of a small number of staff (1–5).
</p>
<h3>Standard services ICC</h3>
<p>A standard services ICC provides the same knowledge sharing as a best practices ICC but enforces technical consistency in software development and hardware selection. A standard services ICC focuses on processes such as standardizing and enforcing naming conventions, establishing metadata standards, instituting change management procedures, and providing training on standards. This type of ICC also evaluates emerging technologies, selects vendors, and oversees hardware and software systems. It is typically closely associated with the enterprise architecture team and may be larger than a best practices ICC.
</p>
<h3>Shared services ICC</h3>
<p>A shared services ICC provides a supported technical environment and services ranging from development support all the way through to a help desk for projects in production. This type of ICC is significantly more complex than a Best Practices or Standard Services model. It establishes processes for knowledge management, including product training, standards enforcement, technology benchmarking, and <a href="/facts/Metadata/qt35z79C">metadata</a> management, and it facilitates impact analysis, software quality, and effective use of developer resources across projects. The organizational structure of a Shared Services ICC is sometimes referred to as a hybrid or federated model which often includes a small central coordinating team plus dotted-line reporting relationships with multiple distributed teams.
</p>
<h3>Central services ICC</h3>
<p>A central services ICC controls integration across the enterprise. It carries out the same processes as the other models, but in addition usually has its own budget and a charge-back methodology. It also offers more support for development projects, providing management, development resources, <a href="/facts/Data_profiling/K9zFvA8r">data profiling</a>, data quality, and unit testing. Because a central services ICC is more involved in development activities than the other models, it requires a production operator and a data integration developer. The staff in a central services ICC does not necessarily need to be located centrally and may be distributed geographically; the important distinction is that the staffs have a solid line reporting relationship to the ICC Director. The size of these teams can vary and may be as large as 10%-15% of the IT staff in an organization.
</p>
<h3>Self-service ICC</h3>
<p>The self-service ICC represents the highest level of maturity in an organization. The ICC itself may be almost invisible in that its functions are so ingrained in the day-to-day systems development life cycle and its operations are so tightly integrated with the infrastructure that it may require only a small central team to sustain itself. This ICC model achieves both a highly efficient operation and provides an environment where independent development and innovation can flourish. This goal is achieved by strict enforcement of a set of application integration standards through automated processes enabled by tools and systems.
</p>
<h2 id="key-challenges">Key challenges</h2>
<p>ICC as a concept is fairly simple. It is the embodiment of IT management best practices to deliver shared services. However, being an organizational concept it is far more challenging to implement in practice than the conceptual view because every organization has different DNA, and it takes specific personalization/customization effort for ICC that makes the ICC initiative successful. Here are some of the common challenges in ICC establishment journey:
</p>
<ul><li>Change management in terms of technology, processes, organization structure</li>
<li>Ability of the organization to deal with the pace and quanta of change</li>
<li>Alignment of stakeholders and process owners for ICC strategy</li>
<li>Inappropriate ownership level of ICC program and lack of senior management sponsorship</li>
<li>Highly tactical focus and business program level constraints</li>
<li>Ignoring foundational elements and jumping to implementation directly</li>
<li>Inappropriate funding</li></ul>
<p>These issues are important to consider when embarking on the ICC investment since the last leg of the implementation of ICC is what matters most. Intellectual definitions of ICC that are not implemented in the organization have no real value for the enterprise.
</p>
<h2 id="see-also">See also</h2>
<ul><li><a href="/facts/Lean_Integration/RB2TQuwq">Lean Integration</a></li></ul>

<h2 id="further-reading">Further reading</h2>
<ul><li>Maurizio Lenzerini (2002). "Data Integration: A Theoretical Perspective". PODS 2002: 243–246.</li></ul>
<h2 id="external-links">External links</h2>
<ul><li>The Role of the Integration Competency Center, 2002 (<a href="https://www.gartner.com/en/documents/365460">https://www.gartner.com/en/documents/365460</a>)</li>
<li>ICC Handbook, 2005 (<a href="http://proact-dt.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/Integration-Competency-Center.pdf">http://proact-dt.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/Integration-Competency-Center.pdf</a>)</li>
<li>ICC Organizing the Complexity and Chaos, 2015 (<a href="https://www.remedi.com/blog/your-blog-post-title-here">https://www.remedi.com/blog/your-blog-post-title-here</a>)</li>
<li>University of Illinois (<a href="https://www.aits.uillinois.edu/common/pages/DisplayFile.aspx?itemId=101024">https://www.aits.uillinois.edu/common/pages/DisplayFile.aspx?itemId=101024</a>)</li>
<li>Gartner paper (<a href="http://www.ebizq.net/topics/tech_in_biz/features/5360.html">http://www.ebizq.net/topics/tech_in_biz/features/5360.html</a>)</li>
<li>Integration Warstories - article about avoiding ICC pitfalls (<a href="https://web.archive.org/web/20170730052826/https://integrationwarstories.com/2013/10/25/avoiding-pitfalls-of-integration-competency-centers/">https://web.archive.org/web/20170730052826/https://integrationwarstories.com/2013/10/25/avoiding-pitfalls-of-integration-competency-centers/</a>)</li></ul>

<h2 id="references">References</h2>

<ol>
<li id="fn:1"><p>John G. Schmidt and David Lyle (2005), Integration Competency Center, An Implementation Methodology, ISBN 0-9769163-0-4 <a href="/wiki/ISBN_(identifier)" target="_blank">/wiki/ISBN_(identifier)</a> <a href="#fnref:1" class="footnote-back-ref">↩</a></p></li>
<li id="fn:2"><p>John G. Schmidt and David Lyle (2005), Integration Competency Center, An Implementation Methodology, ISBN 0-9769163-0-4 <a href="/wiki/ISBN_(identifier)" target="_blank">/wiki/ISBN_(identifier)</a> <a href="#fnref:2" class="footnote-back-ref">↩</a></p></li>
<li id="fn:3"><p>John G. Schmidt and David Lyle (2005), Integration Competency Center, An Implementation Methodology, ISBN 0-9769163-0-4 <a href="/wiki/ISBN_(identifier)" target="_blank">/wiki/ISBN_(identifier)</a> <a href="#fnref:3" class="footnote-back-ref">↩</a></p></li>
</ol>

Integration competency center open-in-new

Integration competency center