The design of early ultrafast electron diffraction instruments was based on X-ray streak cameras, the first reported ultrafast electron diffraction experiment demonstrating an electron pulse length of 100 picoseconds (10–10 seconds).1 The temporal resolution of ultrafast electron diffraction has been reduced to the attosecond (10–18 second) time scale to perform attosecond electron diffraction measurements which reveal electron motion dynamics.2
The electron pulses are typically produced by the process of photoemission in which a femtosecond optical pulse is directed toward a photocathode.3 If the incident laser pulse has an appropriate energy, electrons will be ejected from the photocathode through a process known as photoemission. The electrons are subsequently accelerated to high energies, ranging from tens of kiloelectron-volts4 to several megaelectron-volts,5 using an electron gun.
Generally, two methods are used in order to compress electron pulses in order to overcome pulsewidth expansion due to Coulomb repulsion. Generating high-flux ultrashort electron beams has been relatively straightforward, but pulse duration below a picosecond proved extremely difficult due to space-charge effects. Space-charge interactions increase in severity with bunch charge and rapidly act to broaden the pulse duration, which has resulted in an apparently unavoidable trade-off between signal (bunch charge) and time-resolution in ultrafast electron diffraction experiments. Radio-frequency (RF) compression has emerged has an leading method of reducing the pulse expansion in ultrafast electron diffraction experiments, achieving temporal resolution well below 50 femtoseconds.6 Shorter electron beams below 10 femtoseconds are ultimately required to probe the fastest dynamics in solid state materials and observe gas phase molecular reactions.7
For studying irreversible process, a diffraction signal is obtained from a single electron bunch containing 10 5 {\displaystyle 10^{5}} or more particles.8
When studying reversible process, especially weak signals caused by, e.g., thermal diffuse scattering, a diffraction pattern is accumulated from many electron bunches, as many as 10 8 {\displaystyle 10^{8}} .9
The resolution of an ultrafast electron diffraction apparatus can be characterized both in space and in time. Spatial resolution comes in two distinct parts: real space and reciprocal space. Real space resolution is determined by the physical size of the electron probe on the sample. A smaller physical probe size can allow experiments on crystals that cannot feasibly be grown in large sizes.10
High reciprocal space resolution allows for the detection of Bragg diffraction spots that correspond to long periodicity phenomena. It can be calculated with the following equation:11
where Δs is the reciprocal space resolution, λe is the Compton wavelength of the electrons, ϵn is the normalized emittance of the electrons, and σx is the size of the probe on the sample.
Temporal resolution is primarily a function of the bunch length of the electrons and the relative timing jitters between the pump and probe.12
Mourou, Gerard; Williamson, Steve (1982). "Picosecond electron diffraction". Applied Physics Letters. 41 (1): 44. Bibcode:1982ApPhL..41...44M. doi:10.1063/1.93316. /wiki/Applied_Physics_Letters ↩
Hui, Dandan; Alqattan, Husain; Sennary, Mohamed; Golubev, Nikolay V.; Hassan, Mohammed Th. (2024-08-23). "Attosecond electron microscopy and diffraction". Science Advances. 10 (34). doi:10.1126/sciadv.adp5805. ISSN 2375-2548. PMC 11338230. PMID 39167650. https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/sciadv.adp5805 ↩
Srinivasan, R.; Lobastov, V.; Ruan, C.-Y.; Zewail, A. (2003). "Ultrafast Electron Diffraction (UED)". Helvetica. 86 (6): 1761–1799. doi:10.1002/hlca.200390147. /wiki/Doi_(identifier) ↩
Siwick, Bradley J.; Dwyer, Jason R.; Jordan, Robert E.; Miller, R. J. Dwayne (21 Nov 2003). "An Atomic-Level View of Melting Using Femtosecond Electron Diffraction". Science. 302 (5649): 1382–1385. Bibcode:2003Sci...302.1382S. doi:10.1126/science.1090052. PMID 14631036. S2CID 4593938. /wiki/Bibcode_(identifier) ↩
Weathersby, S. P. (2015). "Mega-electron-volt ultrafast electron diffraction at SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory". Review of Scientific Instruments. 86 (7): 073702. Bibcode:2015RScI...86g3702W. doi:10.1063/1.4926994. PMID 26233391. S2CID 17652180. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1022&context=physicscenturion ↩
Qi, F. (2020). "Breaking 50 Femtosecond Resolution Barrier in MeV Ultrafast Electron Diffraction with a Double Bend Achromat Compressor". Physical Review Letters. 124 (13): 134803. arXiv:2003.08046. Bibcode:2020PhRvL.124m4803Q. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.124.134803. PMID 32302182. S2CID 212747515. https://journals.aps.org/prl/abstract/10.1103/PhysRevLett.124.134803 ↩
Gliserin, A. (2015). "Sub-phonon-period compression of electron pulses for atomic diffraction". Nat Commun. 6 (8723): 4. Bibcode:2015NatCo...6.8723G. doi:10.1038/ncomms9723. PMC 4640064. PMID 26502750. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4640064 ↩
Siwick, Bradley J; Dwyer, Jason R; Jordan, Robert E; Miller, RJ Dwayne (2003). "An atomic-level view of melting using femtosecond electron diffraction". Science. 302 (5649): 1382–1385. Bibcode:2003Sci...302.1382S. doi:10.1126/science.1090052. PMID 14631036. S2CID 4593938. /wiki/Science_(journal) ↩
de Cotret, Laurent P Ren{\'e}; Otto, Martin R; P{\"o}hls, Jan-Hendrik; Luo, Zhongzhen; Kanatzidis, Mercouri G; Siwick, Bradley J (2022). "Direct visualization of polaron formation in the thermoelectric SnSe". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 119 (3). arXiv:2111.10012. Bibcode:2022PNAS..11913967R. doi:10.1073/pnas.2113967119. PMC 8784136. PMID 35012983. S2CID 244463218. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8784136 ↩
Bie, Ya-Qing; Zong, Alfred; Wang, Xirui; Jarillo-Herrero, Pablo; Gedik, Nuh (2021). "A versatile sample fabrication method for ultrafast electron diffraction". Ultramicroscopy. 230: 113389. doi:10.1016/j.ultramic.2021.113389. PMID 34530284. S2CID 237546671. https://doi.org/10.1016%2Fj.ultramic.2021.113389 ↩