The first automated ECG programs were developed in the 1970s, when digital ECG machines became possible by third-generation digital signal processing boards. Commercial models, such as those developed by Marquette Electronics—General Electric (GE), Hewlett-Packard-Philips and Mortara incorporated these programs into clinically used devices.1
Further, automated interpretation of ECGs was driven by advancements in microprocessor technology. In 1979, the introduction of the Motorola 68000 32-bit microprocessor enabled a leap forward in ECG device capabilities.2
During the 1980s and 1990s, extensive research was carried out by companies and by university labs in order to improve the accuracy rate, which was not very high in the first models. For this purpose, several signal databases with normal and abnormal ECGs were built by institutions such as MIT and used to test the algorithms and their accuracy.
The manufacturing industries of ECG machines is now entirely digital, and many models incorporate embedded software for analysis and interpretation of ECG recordings with 3 or more leads. Consumer products, such as home ECG recorders for simple, 1-channel heart arrhythmia detection, also use basic ECG analysis, essentially to detect abnormalities. Some application areas are:
The automated ECG interpretation is a useful tool when access to a specialist is not possible. Although considerable effort has been made to improve automated ECG algorithms, the sensitivity of the automated ECG interpretation is of limited value in the case of STEMI equivalent89 as for example with "hyperacute T waves",10 de Winter ST-T complex,11 Wellens phenomenon, Left ventricular hypertrophy, left bundle branch block or in presence of a pacemaker. Automated monitoring of ST-segment during patient transport is increasingly used and improves STEMI detection sensitivity, as ST elevation is a dynamical phenomenon.
Translated and reproduced by permission of the author.
Macfarlane, Peter W.; Kennedy, Julie (23 September 2021). "Automated ECG Interpretation—A Brief History from High Expectations to Deepest Networks". Hearts. 2 (4): 433–448. doi:10.3390/hearts2040034. ISSN 2673-3846.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: unflagged free DOI (link) https://www.mdpi.com/2673-3846/2/4/34 ↩
"HeartLine - News from the Division of Cardiology at the University of California, San Francisco - Center for Biosignal Research Decoding Music of the Heart" (PDF). The 1979 release of the Motorola 68000 32-bit microprocessor chip was a gamechanger. "This chip allowed us to design a circuit board with the horsepower to do everything," said Dr. Mortara, who invented the hardware and software for the new interpretive ECG device. "It no longer had to be connected to an outside computer, and the interpretation was rendered immediately [by the machine], right at the bedside. {{cite web}}: line feed character in |quote= at position 33 (help) https://www.amps-llc.com/uploads/2025-1-31/Heartline_dec2024-Biosignal%20cover%20story.pdf ↩
BioPac Systems. Application Note: Automated ECG Analysis http://www.biopac.com/Manuals/app_pdf/app148.pdf ↩
Al-Fahoum, AS; Howitt, I. Combined wavelet transformation and radial basis neural networks for classifying life threatening cardiac arrhythmias, Med. Biol. Eng. Comput. 37 (1999), pp. 566–573. ↩
Mautgreve, W., et al. HES EKG expert-an expert system for comprehensive ECG analysis and teaching. Proc. Computers in Cardiology: Jerusalem, Israel 19–22 September 1989. (USA: IEEE Comput. Soc. Press, 1990. p. 77–80). ↩
Bortolan, G., et al. ECG classification with neural networks and cluster analysis. Proc. Computers in Cardiology. Venice, Italy, 23–26 September 1991. (USA: IEEE Comput. Soc. Press, 1991. p. 177-80). ↩
Sabbatini, R.M.E. Applications of artificial neural networks in biological signal processing. MD Computing, 3(2), 165-172 March 1996. ↩
Difficult ECGs in STEMI: lessons learned from serial sampling of pre- and in-hospital ECGs, Ayer et al., JECG, 2014 http://www.jecgonline.com/article/S0022-0736%2814%2900121-6/abstract ↩
ECG Interpretation - STEMI and equivalent, ebook http://www.ecg-quiz.com/guidelines/stemi/ ↩
The Prominent T wave: Electrocardiographic differential diagnosis[usurped], Sommers et al., American Journal of Emergency Medicine https://archive.today/20131207033000/http://www.ajemjournal.com/article/S0735-6757(02)92193-5/abstract ↩
A New ECG Sign of Proximal LAD Occlusion, de Winter, NEJM, 2008 http://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMc0804737 ↩